Wright State Invitational
- pikachu4919
- Moderator
- Posts: 716
- Joined: December 7th, 2012, 2:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: IN
- Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
- Has thanked: 89 times
- Been thanked: 167 times
Re: Wright State Invitational
Dang Unome your predictions were pretty close!
Carmel HS (IN) '16
Purdue BioE '21? reevaluating my life choices
Nationals 2016 ~ 4th place Forensics
"It is important to draw wisdom from different places. If you take it from only one place, it becomes rigid and stale." -Uncle Iroh
About me || Rate my tests!
Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.
MY CABBAGES!
Purdue BioE '21? reevaluating my life choices
Nationals 2016 ~ 4th place Forensics
"It is important to draw wisdom from different places. If you take it from only one place, it becomes rigid and stale." -Uncle Iroh
About me || Rate my tests!
Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.
MY CABBAGES!
Re: Wright State Invitational
In Illinois, a JV team can have more than 15 members. So they can bring their entire JV team to Wright State for experience, but they have to agree to forgo any medals that the JV kids might earn and have a massive penalty that makes sure they are at the bottom of the team ranks.
-
- Member
- Posts: 30
- Joined: December 30th, 2016, 8:23 am
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Wright State Invitational
Does anyone know what happened to Hovercraft? It was a trial event for Division B and C at WSU, some are saying because it "didn't go well"
2017 MI State Champion of Chemistry Lab
2016 MI State Champion of Fossils
Past events: Chemistry Lab, Electric Vehicle, Materials Science, Robot Arm, Bridge Building, Fossils, Disease Detectives
Proud 2016-2017 Co-Captain of the IA Central Gnomes
2016 MI State Champion of Fossils
Past events: Chemistry Lab, Electric Vehicle, Materials Science, Robot Arm, Bridge Building, Fossils, Disease Detectives
Proud 2016-2017 Co-Captain of the IA Central Gnomes
-
- Member
- Posts: 35
- Joined: May 25th, 2016, 1:04 pm
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Wright State Invitational
Thoughts on the crime busters test? ![Exclamation :!:](./images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif)
![Exclamation :!:](./images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif)
Rustin/Wright/Solon/Reg/PA/Nat Div B: '15-17, Div C: '18-
Disease D-
'15: 6/-/-/-/-/-/
'16: -/10/-/-/-/-
Air T-
'15: 2/-/-/-/-/-
Experimental D-
'16: 5/-/-/-/-/-
Mission P-
'16: 1/12/-/1/-/-
'17: 1/5/3/1/2/12
Crime B-
'16: 3/8/-/-/-/-
'17: 1/7/7/3/8/24
Wind P-
'17: 5/3/2/1/1/13
Disease D-
'15: 6/-/-/-/-/-/
'16: -/10/-/-/-/-
Air T-
'15: 2/-/-/-/-/-
Experimental D-
'16: 5/-/-/-/-/-
Mission P-
'16: 1/12/-/1/-/-
'17: 1/5/3/1/2/12
Crime B-
'16: 3/8/-/-/-/-
'17: 1/7/7/3/8/24
Wind P-
'17: 5/3/2/1/1/13
Re: Wright State Invitational
From the Hovercraft Forum here:
Apparently there was an appeal at Wright State, largely due to rules violation of the track(s).
The track for the B event was shortened to less than the 130 cm requirement in the rules, and there was an apparent uphill portion. near the finish line. This after the original tables on which they mounted the rails had a dip, and the first craft that ran got stuck between one of the rails and the table. Due to the issue with the B track, the ES apparently decided to change the C track as well. All of this took place during the first test block. Many of the competitors also had to catch their craft at the end of the track so the craft didn't hit the floor due to the table length. That certainly made for some nervous hovercraft coaches.
When we ran a hovercraft event for an invitational, we used a 15.5-inch-wide by 8-foot-long piece of melamine shelving board (purchased at Lowes) and screwed the metal studs to that. That removed the potential for crafts getting stuck under the rails, and dips in any tables that we laid the track across, particularly since we did not know the layout of the room before the event.
I certainly hope they get the bugs worked out before Nationals. It cost us a higher overall ranking since both our hovercraft teams were in the top 10.
Apparently there was an appeal at Wright State, largely due to rules violation of the track(s).
The track for the B event was shortened to less than the 130 cm requirement in the rules, and there was an apparent uphill portion. near the finish line. This after the original tables on which they mounted the rails had a dip, and the first craft that ran got stuck between one of the rails and the table. Due to the issue with the B track, the ES apparently decided to change the C track as well. All of this took place during the first test block. Many of the competitors also had to catch their craft at the end of the track so the craft didn't hit the floor due to the table length. That certainly made for some nervous hovercraft coaches.
When we ran a hovercraft event for an invitational, we used a 15.5-inch-wide by 8-foot-long piece of melamine shelving board (purchased at Lowes) and screwed the metal studs to that. That removed the potential for crafts getting stuck under the rails, and dips in any tables that we laid the track across, particularly since we did not know the layout of the room before the event.
I certainly hope they get the bugs worked out before Nationals. It cost us a higher overall ranking since both our hovercraft teams were in the top 10.
-
- Member
- Posts: 69
- Joined: February 9th, 2016, 2:53 pm
- Division: C
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Wright State Invitational
Yeah the track really messed everything up. The target time was basically impossible for us to achieve as the only way to actually get to the finish line was to put our back motor at full speed.
ntso
quack quack
quack quack
-
- Member
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Wright State Invitational
To avoid duplicating posts, there's more info in the Hovercraft thread about this: viewtopic.php?f=226&t=9283&start=375#p305976ericlepanda wrote:Yeah the track really messed everything up. The target time was basically impossible for us to achieve as the only way to actually get to the finish line was to put our back motor at full speed.
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
-
- Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: January 31st, 2017, 3:37 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Wright State Invitational
Hey all!
Congrats to the winners and medalists, and big thanks to all the proctors and organizers, it went really well, can't wait for nats.
Did anyone place top 10 in optics? If so, what score did you get? With a LSS score of 44.7 and a test score of 33, we thought we got in the top few but turned out in 11th place. Can anyone who did better elaborate on their score? We know the test is what we need to work on but we didn't realize it was going that poorly. Were people able to get significantly better laser shoots?
Thanks in advance for the help! :D
Congrats to the winners and medalists, and big thanks to all the proctors and organizers, it went really well, can't wait for nats.
Did anyone place top 10 in optics? If so, what score did you get? With a LSS score of 44.7 and a test score of 33, we thought we got in the top few but turned out in 11th place. Can anyone who did better elaborate on their score? We know the test is what we need to work on but we didn't realize it was going that poorly. Were people able to get significantly better laser shoots?
Thanks in advance for the help! :D
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest