Scioly Assassination 100: Mafia Reborn

[EpicFailOlympian]

Well, I accuse Skink for making a big fuss out of this game.

[Skink]

Really? They're gonna accept that waste of an accusation, too, considering it's wrong.

I accuse EpicFailOlympian for being equally suspicious.

[EpicFailOlympian]

Before everyone freaks out, I point out I didn't use the "following template 'I accuse (place name here) because (give reason here).'" If you read it correctly, I simply blamed Skink for making a big fuss

[Skink]

In any event, I'm just being legalistic like this Sassy. The rules are either incomplete, or we don't actually have to solve any clues. We just wait until enough clues (and ID clues that go along with them) are posted to solve it and have hard data to accuse with.

[Cedavis6]

OKAY, ACCUSATIONS ARE NOT JOKES. THIS IS FOR THE SASSIES AND THE OFFICERS.

I want people to look at this game like game 50. So, let's focus on the game, try to solve the clues, think logically about who the Sassies are, not have anymore posts like this, not stereotype the n00bs/ older players, be as helpful as you can, and HAVE FUN.

With love,
C

[iwonder]

Skink didn't use that template either I think a lot of the normal sassy rules are implied and you're reading too much into it.

[Skink]

not stereotype the n00bs/ older players

Stereotypes save time. It's funny you mention this one because, provisionally, I had thought we'd be dealing with someone (possibly highly) experienced. I'm rethinking that now after what I posted earlier, something so important missing from the rules. It seems like an oversight reminiscent of some older game(s)...so just a heads-up, folks, yesterday's accusations could have been wrong, at least partially.

[A Person]

So were all the accusations wrong?

[EpicFailOlympian]

I AM THE ASSASSINATOR TROLOLOLOLOL

GRATZ SKINK PM ME YOUR CHOICE FOR THE NEXT SASSY.

[Cedavis6]

not stereotype the n00bs/ older players

Stereotypes save time. It's funny you mention this one because, provisionally, I had thought we'd be dealing with someone (possibly highly) experienced. I'm rethinking that now after what I posted earlier, something so important missing from the rules. It seems like an oversight reminiscent of some older game(s)...so just a heads-up, folks, yesterday's accusations could have been wrong, at least partially.

I say this because I think that's what's ruining the games. People tend to think n00bs are crappy players who don't try and older players are some sorta gods. (Ok, exaggeration, but you get the point.) I hate how people said I wasn't trying in 88, when in reality I was.

Crap, I'm ranting again.