Scioly.org

I think we're looking at this wrong, but I can't think of another way to look at it...
Maybe it's Luo because of the duck/dock only one letter difference... but that would be a bad clue IMO.

I think you guys are thinking through this too hard...it's got to be something really obvious.

(This is probably very wrong but it can serve as some food for thought)

Getting to amerikestrel may have been the first part of the clue, but paleonaps' avatar is an american kestrel (right? I never did Orni, I just reverse searched his avatar ), and he's targeted much more often (again...right? That's what I think, at least). The "two" ducks may have been in reference to there being two steps to this process.

Like I said, it's probably pretty wrong, but hey, if you guys don't get anywhere else, protecting 'naps might not be too bad of a protect compared to a random one.

Well, since we are sharing leads, it could be pointing to me.
The ships at Pearl Harbor could be considered "sitting ducks". The ships and docks were destroyed when Japan bombed it. This led to our involvement with Japan in WWII and eventually the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Thats probably still to complicated but whatever.

Littleboy wrote:Well, since we are sharing leads, it could be pointing to me.
The ships at Pearl Harbor could be considered "sitting ducks". The ships and docks were destroyed when Japan bombed it. This led to our involvement with Japan in WWII and eventually the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Thats probably still to complicated but whatever.

I think this may be the answer.

I'll go and protect Littleboy because of the mention of sitting ducks and docks.

Someone needs to accuse forever...

tornado guy wrote:Someone needs to accuse forever...

¿Porquè?
(Why?)

Cedavis6 wrote:

tornado guy wrote:Someone needs to accuse forever...

¿Porquè?
(Why?)

I'm not saying that you should accuse her, but I think I know what Tornado is getting at.

If you haven't noticed, Forever is offering up a bunch of help on the clues, but she isn't willing to be an officer.

foreverphysics wrote:

TheGenius wrote:

foreverphysics wrote:I am not going to be an officer this game, but you guys really need more dedication.

Your statement seems quite hypocritical.

I am not going to be a officer for reasons I won't disclose right now, but bear in mind that I only made this decision because I had to.

Doesn't that seem a bit suspicious?

I'm not sure if that's what Tornado meant, but yeah. :p

Cedavis6 wrote: ¿Por qué?
(Why?)

Fix'd