Well some of us aren't as privileged as you are napspaleonaps wrote:I kind of try to think whether I would rather last at Nats or just missing it with a third at states?

Well some of us aren't as privileged as you are napspaleonaps wrote:I kind of try to think whether I would rather last at Nats or just missing it with a third at states?
Wow. Quite harsh are we not?paleonaps wrote:I kind of try to think whether I would rather last at Nats or just missing it with a third at states?
Sorry to burst your ignorance but we will have a majority next year. 7 seniors+probably 5 juniors+ 3 sophomores. Seniors is still the majority.srsvball95 wrote:Sorry to burst your bubble, but you can only have a max of 7 seniors per teamM-E-T-H-O-D MAN wrote: Word up, and next year we'll be a majority of Seniors!
I would rather have last at nats. And so would everyone on this forum. Trust me.paleonaps wrote:I kind of try to think whether I would rather last at Nats or just missing it with a third at states?
If you get last at nats, you still had to have gotten 2nd or 1st at states anyway.zyzzyva98 wrote:I would rather have last at nats. And so would everyone on this forum. Trust me.paleonaps wrote:I kind of try to think whether I would rather last at Nats or just missing it with a third at states?
<quizbowl> ey kid ya want some shortbread
<EASTstroudsburg13> I don't know why, but I just can't bring myself to delete this post.
Well that would be kinda embassing.. but I agreequizbowl13 wrote:i would rather even get disqualified in every single event at nats than to not go at all. and im sure that most people here would agree.
When you go, no matter how much you tell yourself that, last doesn't cut it.quizbowl13 wrote:i would rather even get disqualified in every single event at nats than to not go at all. and im sure that most people here would agree.