Page 5 of 50

Re: Anatomy B/C

Posted: September 10th, 2010, 8:04 pm
by RandomPerson
I have started my gradual update to the 2 anatomy sections that are lacking (endocrine and respiratory) starting with endocrine. My time is short this year, but I will try to do my best to finish the endocrine this weekend, for those antzy about wiki updates. Hopefully respiratory the next weekend.

Re: Anatomy B/C

Posted: September 11th, 2010, 8:31 pm
by RandomPerson
RandomPerson52 wrote:I have started my gradual update to the 2 anatomy sections that are lacking (endocrine and respiratory) starting with endocrine. My time is short this year, but I will try to do my best to finish the endocrine this weekend, for those antzy about wiki updates. Hopefully respiratory the next weekend.
Classes of Hormones has been added, took me longer than I thought.
Let me know what you guys think of the new page, I'm getting my information from a college textbook, and its a bit difficult to distinguish where the line is between what information is superfluous for the wiki, and what is not.

Re: Anatomy B/C

Posted: September 12th, 2010, 4:03 pm
by SOninja
soobsession wrote:The 2011 Muscles List is out!!!

http://soinc.org/sites/default/files/20 ... uscles.pdf

The changes are on the list (added: buccinator, diaphragm. removed: temporalis, thoracolumbar facia)

lol thank goodness they removed the thoracolumbar fascia
i, for one, am glad. :)

Re: Anatomy B/C

Posted: September 12th, 2010, 4:49 pm
by Flavorflav
RandomPerson52 wrote:
RandomPerson52 wrote:I have started my gradual update to the 2 anatomy sections that are lacking (endocrine and respiratory) starting with endocrine. My time is short this year, but I will try to do my best to finish the endocrine this weekend, for those antzy about wiki updates. Hopefully respiratory the next weekend.
Classes of Hormones has been added, took me longer than I thought.
Let me know what you guys think of the new page, I'm getting my information from a college textbook, and its a bit difficult to distinguish where the line is between what information is superfluous for the wiki, and what is not.
It's good, but in the rules the third class is steroids - we're supposed to ignore the eicosanoids.

Re: Anatomy B/C

Posted: September 12th, 2010, 5:31 pm
by RandomPerson
Flavorflav wrote:
RandomPerson52 wrote:
RandomPerson52 wrote:I have started my gradual update to the 2 anatomy sections that are lacking (endocrine and respiratory) starting with endocrine. My time is short this year, but I will try to do my best to finish the endocrine this weekend, for those antzy about wiki updates. Hopefully respiratory the next weekend.
Classes of Hormones has been added, took me longer than I thought.
Let me know what you guys think of the new page, I'm getting my information from a college textbook, and its a bit difficult to distinguish where the line is between what information is superfluous for the wiki, and what is not.
It's good, but in the rules the third class is steroids - we're supposed to ignore the eicosanoids.
Apparently I can't read, thanks for that.

Re: Anatomy B/C

Posted: October 3rd, 2010, 8:15 pm
by mali_16
Somebody still needs to update the wiki for Respiratory. I think it needs some work. It would be great if someone could do that.

Re: Anatomy B/C

Posted: October 4th, 2010, 10:27 am
by paleonaps
RandomPerson is probably going to do that.

Re: Anatomy B/C

Posted: October 8th, 2010, 7:56 pm
by sogirl
is there any good sites for studying the muscular system?

Re: Anatomy B/C

Posted: October 9th, 2010, 9:32 am
by Paradox21
http://scioly.org/wiki/Anatomy/Muscular has some basic info. The Anatomy page on SOinc.org has several useful sources. The University of Minnesota site is good for learning identification of muscles, if you want to approach it that way. I always find a good textbook to be the most useful. If you get specific questions, google them, or read wikipedia articles on the topic.

Re: Anatomy B/C

Posted: October 10th, 2010, 7:02 am
by paleonaps
It feels very nice when someone recommends something you pretty much wrote half of as a beginning resource. :)