Page 5 of 9

Re: Scores

Posted: January 25th, 2020, 3:14 pm
by xiangyu
sciolyperson1 wrote: January 25th, 2020, 2:44 pm
lavarball wrote: January 25th, 2020, 9:14 am4.6

Target distance was 9.85, first run, 0.8cm off. Score of 4.6.
Wow. Congrats!

Re: Scores

Posted: January 27th, 2020, 8:31 pm
by sciolyperson1
For MIT: Can someone confirm that top 6 scores were less than 2-3cm? I heard about it as a rumor, but my intuition makes me believe that 3cm can't be top 6... maybe just top 3?

Re: Scores

Posted: January 28th, 2020, 5:50 am
by sdececco
sciolyperson1 wrote: January 27th, 2020, 8:31 pm For MIT: Can someone confirm that top 6 scores were less than 2-3cm? I heard about it as a rumor, but my intuition makes me believe that 3cm can't be top 6... maybe just top 3?
I was sitting behind the team that got 6th place at MIT and they said there raw score was an 8.6

Re: Scores

Posted: January 28th, 2020, 7:49 am
by Airco2020
sdececco wrote: January 28th, 2020, 5:50 am
sciolyperson1 wrote: January 27th, 2020, 8:31 pm For MIT: Can someone confirm that top 6 scores were less than 2-3cm? I heard about it as a rumor, but my intuition makes me believe that 3cm can't be top 6... maybe just top 3?
I was sitting behind the team that got 6th place at MIT and they said there raw score was an 8.6
That's crazy! I've got more work to do! For the top teams it's now all about speed.

Re: Scores

Posted: January 28th, 2020, 7:54 am
by lavarball
Airco2020 wrote: January 28th, 2020, 7:49 am
sdececco wrote: January 28th, 2020, 5:50 am
sciolyperson1 wrote: January 27th, 2020, 8:31 pm For MIT: Can someone confirm that top 6 scores were less than 2-3cm? I heard about it as a rumor, but my intuition makes me believe that 3cm can't be top 6... maybe just top 3?
I was sitting behind the team that got 6th place at MIT and they said there raw score was an 8.6
That's crazy! I've got more work to do! For the top teams it's now all about speed.
They made this event way too simple so there really isnt even a skill gap anymore. You see the most random teams winning just because of the RNG behind it. They might as well switch it's spot with ppp and make it an inquiry. big dumb

Re: Scores

Posted: January 28th, 2020, 1:04 pm
by mnoga
At the UC Davis Aggie Invitational the top two scores were:

1. Mountain View Gold - 13.2
2. Mountain View Black - 14.4

Run distance was 10.5 and event was run on a tile linoleum floor. I'd call the condition of the floor mediocre at best.

Re: Scores

Posted: February 3rd, 2020, 4:25 am
by lavarball
Top 7 scores at solon were 10 and under...

Re: Scores

Posted: February 3rd, 2020, 1:22 pm
by Unome
lavarball wrote: February 3rd, 2020, 4:25 am Top 7 scores at solon were 10 and under...
Yeah, I was wondering. Those scores seemed quite a bit better than I was expecting. Does anyone know what the distance was?

Re: Scores

Posted: February 3rd, 2020, 1:48 pm
by ZanaBanana
Distance was 9.5m at Solon

Re: Scores

Posted: February 3rd, 2020, 6:28 pm
by MoMoney$$$;)0)
You have to say though, the score curve was interesting for the invitational since around 10cm would get you around 15th place there, but probably top 10 in other invitationals. But to be fair, if you were used to a good floor, you weren't getting the distance you expected there, since the floor was a piece of garbage; mediocre being a complement.