Re: Scores
Posted: March 14th, 2018, 10:24 am
Agreedterence.tan wrote:Probably 25*25*25 and underKyanite wrote:What do you all think will be a competitive size for nationals?
Agreedterence.tan wrote:Probably 25*25*25 and underKyanite wrote:What do you all think will be a competitive size for nationals?
Yes.ScottMaurer19 wrote:Has anyone broken 1500 yet?
Care to share by how much? 1600?marty3 wrote:Yes.ScottMaurer19 wrote:Has anyone broken 1500 yet?
I probably shouldn't share specific scores (though I do encourage competitors to share their score estimates). If I'm not mistaken, a handful of teams could have gotten 1650+. Chemical timers are risky, as they are a huge benefit if they work, but they can hurt a lot if they fail.ScottMaurer19 wrote:Care to share by how much? 1600?marty3 wrote:Yes.ScottMaurer19 wrote:Has anyone broken 1500 yet?
Is this with the assumption of 90s run time?windu34 wrote:I have heard of 4-5 separate schools obtaining +1500 and I am confident there are at least a few more out there capable of obtaining such scores.