Re: Trial Events
Posted: April 17th, 2009, 8:22 pm
And the book comes with cool designed paper so you can make your plane camouflage and other designs!

I'm actually inclined to agree with you on this now, especially since Car of Tomorrow- a NY trial- was run so badly at States (it involves building a maglev car, and the maglev track they had at States had the polarities switched, so all the teams that had their magnets on the right way had to switch them- and most couldn't get their cars to work afterwards- while all the teams that had them the wrong way were essentially rewarded for not reading the rules and clarifications. We appealed it, along with a couple other teams, but the appeal was denied and they counted it anyway.)JustDroobles wrote: I think don't think alternates can compete in trial events if they count. I think trial events not counting is the more logical thing to do. It gives the alternates something to do instead of waiting around all day. Anyway, why would you want the trial events to help determine who goes up to the next level? Most regions and states probably want to send a team to Nationals that can do the best at Nationals and represent their state. If trial events are factored in, the best possible National team might not make it.
Trial events are great for extra competition and testing possible events, but aren't the best determining factor of the top placing teams.
we could have used that appeal we had our car move like 1cm my friend said their track magnets were not as strong as the ones we use at our schoolPhenylethylamine wrote:I'm actually inclined to agree with you on this now, especially since Car of Tomorrow- a NY trial- was run so badly at States (it involves building a maglev car, and the maglev track they had at States had the polarities switched, so all the teams that had their magnets on the right way had to switch them- and most couldn't get their cars to work afterwards- while all the teams that had them the wrong way were essentially rewarded for not reading the rules and clarifications. We appealed it, along with a couple other teams, but the appeal was denied and they counted it anyway.)JustDroobles wrote: I think don't think alternates can compete in trial events if they count. I think trial events not counting is the more logical thing to do. It gives the alternates something to do instead of waiting around all day. Anyway, why would you want the trial events to help determine who goes up to the next level? Most regions and states probably want to send a team to Nationals that can do the best at Nationals and represent their state. If trial events are factored in, the best possible National team might not make it.
Trial events are great for extra competition and testing possible events, but aren't the best determining factor of the top placing teams.