Scioly.org

Tailsfan101 wrote:

pikachu4919 wrote:

vb wrote:
This link shows they got 5th.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/ ... 8reCg7sl9m

Lol even that still shows that they got 2nd

2nd in Battery Buggy was Dallas Middle School...

Low score wins.. I think, they messed up in ranking..

Does anyone know the final scores to Chem Clues lol?

Are the raw scores posted anywhere that anyone knows of? I mean like within events.

vb wrote:

Tailsfan101 wrote:

pikachu4919 wrote:
Lol even that still shows that they got 2nd

2nd in Battery Buggy was Dallas Middle School...

Low score wins.. I think, they messed up in ranking..

If it was an order error, idk how they can mess up just the top 6. Given that you claim to have gotten a good score, it isnt possible for the scores to be ranked backwards, otherwise you would be all the way at the end.

shrewdPanther46 wrote:

vb wrote:

Tailsfan101 wrote: 2nd in Battery Buggy was Dallas Middle School...

Low score wins.. I think, they messed up in ranking..

If it was an order error, idk how they can mess up just the top 6. Given that you claim to have gotten a good score, it isnt possible for the scores to be ranked backwards, otherwise you would be all the way at the end.

When they rank the medalists, they ranked “top 6” highest score first..
I guess..

vb wrote:

shrewdPanther46 wrote:

vb wrote: Low score wins.. I think, they messed up in ranking..

If it was an order error, idk how they can mess up just the top 6. Given that you claim to have gotten a good score, it isnt possible for the scores to be ranked backwards, otherwise you would be all the way at the end.

When they rank the medalists, they ranked “top 6” highest score first..
I guess..

Having been privy to the score validation process twice now, I can assure you that it is literally impossible for them to use a different order for the top 6 versus the rest of the teams. A score misstep is possible (perhaps a dropped negative sign?) but it's not an ordering issue.

Few things to notice - Springhouse got 72 points last year and 73 last year, which is literally no difference.

On the other hand, shady side got about 30 LESS points, which means they're improving... a lot.

Also, predictions can start! All 60 teams, except for Arkansas, are on the wiki.

EastStroudsburg13 wrote:

vb wrote:

shrewdPanther46 wrote: If it was an order error, idk how they can mess up just the top 6. Given that you claim to have gotten a good score, it isnt possible for the scores to be ranked backwards, otherwise you would be all the way at the end.

When they rank the medalists, they ranked “top 6” highest score first..
I guess..

Having been privy to the score validation process twice now, I can assure you that it is literally impossible for them to use a different order for the top 6 versus the rest of the teams. A score misstep is possible (perhaps a dropped negative sign?) but it's not an ordering issue.

They did it for battery buggy at my regionals, so I don't know if it's impossible. They called the top 6 like this originally:
1.Team A
2. Team B
3. Team C
4. Team D
5. Team E
6. Team F
But at the end redid it because they said they screwed up and called up:
1. Team F
2. Team E
3. Team D
4. Team C
5. Team B
6. Team A
But, that might just be how that regional was run.

hippo9 wrote:

EastStroudsburg13 wrote:

vb wrote: When they rank the medalists, they ranked “top 6” highest score first..
I guess..

Having been privy to the score validation process twice now, I can assure you that it is literally impossible for them to use a different order for the top 6 versus the rest of the teams. A score misstep is possible (perhaps a dropped negative sign?) but it's not an ordering issue.

They did it for battery buggy at my regionals, so I don't know if it's impossible. They called the top 6 like this originally:
1.Team A
2. Team B
3. Team C
4. Team D
5. Team E
6. Team F
But at the end redid it because they said they screwed up and called up:
1. Team F
2. Team E
3. Team D
4. Team C
5. Team B
6. Team A
But, that might just be how that regional was run.

None of that is possible, just look at the raw scores. Even if a negative sign or something was omitted, his/her score would be below the theoretical minimum score of -25.

shrewdPanther46 wrote:

hippo9 wrote:

EastStroudsburg13 wrote: Having been privy to the score validation process twice now, I can assure you that it is literally impossible for them to use a different order for the top 6 versus the rest of the teams. A score misstep is possible (perhaps a dropped negative sign?) but it's not an ordering issue.

They did it for battery buggy at my regionals, so I don't know if it's impossible. They called the top 6 like this originally:
1.Team A
2. Team B
3. Team C
4. Team D
5. Team E
6. Team F
But at the end redid it because they said they screwed up and called up:
1. Team F
2. Team E
3. Team D
4. Team C
5. Team B
6. Team A
But, that might just be how that regional was run.

None of that is possible, just look at the raw scores. Even if a negative sign or something was omitted, his/her score would be below the theoretical minimum score of -25.

What do you mean? If a negative was omitted the score would be positive. I was just sayin at my regional they flipped the top 6 around.