Mission Possible C

User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 524
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by PM2017 »

ScottMaurer19 wrote:
PM2017 wrote:What about active sensors, like ping))) sensors? (I'm not actually using a Ping))) sensor, I'm just giving an example)
Unsure on that
ok. (I have just submitted an FAQ)
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!
User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 524
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by PM2017 »

Sorry, double post.

Does the rule that states that each adjustable object can only be used by one task prohibit me from using one protoboard to hold multiple, independent circuits? (In essence, this question is asking whether or not a protoboard is considered movable.)

I see no problem with this, but I wanted to run it by the forums just in case.
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!
ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by ScottMaurer19 »

PM2017 wrote:Sorry, double post.

Does the rule that states that each adjustable object can only be used by one task prohibit me from using one protoboard to hold multiple, independent circuits? (In essence, this question is asking whether or not a protoboard is considered movable.)

I see no problem with this, but I wanted to run it by the forums just in case.
As long as the circuits are not connected so that they could just signal eachother directly then I wouldn't see an issue with it. Each circuit, while physically connected, is independent of eachother.
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80
User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 524
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by PM2017 »

Do party blowers count as balloons? I know that homemade items may be counted as balloons, but what about other inflatable, commercially bought items?


EDIT: Oops, ignore this post. I will ask the same question in the correct forum.
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!
radioactivated
Member
Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:34 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by radioactivated »

ScottMaurer19 wrote: Per Patrick Chalker the sensor is not an electrical timer but the chemical timer does not count for points.
Could you clarify what is meant by this? (If we make such a chemical timer using an electrical sensor, it doesn't count for any points related to the timer?)
ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by ScottMaurer19 »

radioactivated wrote:
ScottMaurer19 wrote: Per Patrick Chalker the sensor is not an electrical timer but the chemical timer does not count for points.
Could you clarify what is meant by this? (If we make such a chemical timer using an electrical sensor, it doesn't count for any points related to the timer?)
So it was pretty glossed over when we discussed it. I asked that question and said something along the lines of yea don't worry about something like that. He then told me that chemical timers are a trap
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80
nicholasmaurer
Coach
Coach
Posts: 422
Joined: Fri May 19, 2017 10:55 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by nicholasmaurer »

ScottMaurer19 wrote:
radioactivated wrote:
ScottMaurer19 wrote: Per Patrick Chalker the sensor is not an electrical timer but the chemical timer does not count for points.
Could you clarify what is meant by this? (If we make such a chemical timer using an electrical sensor, it doesn't count for any points related to the timer?)
So it was pretty glossed over when we discussed it. I asked that question and said something along the lines of yea don't worry about something like that. He then told me that chemical timers are a trap
From my memory of the conversation (which obviously isn't an official FAQ), a chemical action/reaction that somehow triggers an electrical sensor would not constitute a timer and therefore not receive bonus points. However, since passive electrical sensors are generally allowed, this would also not incur any penalty.
Assistant Coach and Alumnus ('14) - Solon High School Science Olympiad
Tournament Director - Northeast Ohio Regional Tournament
Tournament Director - Solon High School Science Olympiad Invitational

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.
idontknowanything
Member
Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 9:55 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by idontknowanything »

How would one classify a combustible fuse? Is it like your standard combustible fuse for fireworks, or any combustible reaction that acts as a fuse? Because this could mean that matches and candles could count as combustible fuses and therefore be a construction violation...
Northridge
Member
Member
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 1:47 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by Northridge »

idontknowanything wrote:How would one classify a combustible fuse? Is it like your standard combustible fuse for fireworks, or any combustible reaction that acts as a fuse? Because this could mean that matches and candles could count as combustible fuses and therefore be a construction violation...
Nothing official here, but I believe what we are looking at is actual fuse. Much of that stuff contains gun powder or other chemicals that can potentially be hazardous. I have judged many Missions this year that burned a length of cotton string, and in my book that would be perfectly ok.
Tesel
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 8:03 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mission Possible C

Post by Tesel »

Northridge wrote:
idontknowanything wrote:How would one classify a combustible fuse? Is it like your standard combustible fuse for fireworks, or any combustible reaction that acts as a fuse? Because this could mean that matches and candles could count as combustible fuses and therefore be a construction violation...
Nothing official here, but I believe what we are looking at is actual fuse. Much of that stuff contains gun powder or other chemicals that can potentially be hazardous. I have judged many Missions this year that burned a length of cotton string, and in my book that would be perfectly ok.
I'm struggling. On the one hand, the clarification says "Furthermore, the flame should burn out quickly, not produce any additional flames, and produce a limited amount of smoke." I don't know if a timer intended to take significant time would qualify. On the other hand, it does specifically describe prohibited materials as "Fuel sources such as flammable liquids or gases, chemicals such as magnesium ribbon, and compounds such as gunpowder..." Since a simple string is not on that list, would that be allowed?
University of Michigan Science Olympiad Div. C Event Lead

2018 MI Mission Possible State Champions

Return to “Mission Possible C”