Page 32 of 56

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: February 5th, 2014, 8:54 am
by olympiaddict
I will not be doing mission at regionals but I will be doing it at states. I've submitted clarifications at the national and state levels, and I have emailed the States supervisor directly, but have received no replies.

No matter how you interpret the "visible" rule, that still doesn't address the fact that it is not a "direct" transfer, and therefore not scoreable.

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: February 5th, 2014, 10:07 am
by Cheese_Muffin_Man
Chalker, what's your view on this black box view? Should we still abide to it even though it is not specified in the rules?

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: February 5th, 2014, 12:05 pm
by bossmonkey
does anyone have an opinion on using like bionicle lego mindstorm like pieces?

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: February 5th, 2014, 12:07 pm
by bossmonkey
and what would be a good chemical reaction. that one is stumping me :shock:

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: February 5th, 2014, 12:42 pm
by bossmonkey
Cheese_Muffin_Man wrote:Chalker, what's your view on this black box view? Should we still abide to it even though it is not specified in the rules?
personally since its not in the rules it means its not a rule this year. its gone. out of the rules. not there. meaning anyone trying to abide by a rule that is not in the rules does not make since. if it was a rule dont you think they would have put it in the rules. :lol:

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: February 5th, 2014, 12:44 pm
by Cheese_Muffin_Man
bossmonkey wrote:
Cheese_Muffin_Man wrote:Chalker, what's your view on this black box view? Should we still abide to it even though it is not specified in the rules?
personally since its not in the rules it means its not a rule this year. its gone. out of the rules. not there. meaning anyone trying to abide by a rule that is not in the rules does not make since. if it was a rule dont you think they would have put it in the rules. :lol:
Hmm...so you;re saying that it's valid to consider a match as chemical?

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: February 5th, 2014, 12:49 pm
by bossmonkey
Cheese_Muffin_Man wrote:
bossmonkey wrote:
Cheese_Muffin_Man wrote:Chalker, what's your view on this black box view? Should we still abide to it even though it is not specified in the rules?
personally since its not in the rules it means its not a rule this year. its gone. out of the rules. not there. meaning anyone trying to abide by a rule that is not in the rules does not make since. if it was a rule dont you think they would have put it in the rules. :lol:
Hmm...so you;re saying that it's valid to consider a match as chemical?
all im saying is black box is gone. the rest is your to decide

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: February 5th, 2014, 12:55 pm
by bossmonkey
im thinking the rule is not to be taken too seriously as it is not in the rules.

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: February 5th, 2014, 12:57 pm
by Phys1cs
bossmonkey wrote:and what would be a good chemical reaction. that one is stumping me :shock:
to what/from what?

Re: Mission Possible C

Posted: February 5th, 2014, 12:58 pm
by bossmonkey
from a mechanical. i want to use chemical to activate an electrical or mechanical to turn on the light