I made a printable layout a few weeks ago. Give me a day or two and I can format it a bit an share it. I think there's a good chance there will be an official one the national website...futaba wrote:Hello,
Does anyone know when printable layout and scoring spread sheet will be available on the SO webite?
Thanks,
Robot Arm C
-
bernard
- Administrator

- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: WA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 179 times
- Been thanked: 759 times
Re: Robot Arm C
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
-
windu34
- Staff Emeritus

- Posts: 1382
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
Re: Robot Arm C
How many arms are you guys planning on building. If one, why?
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
-
iwonder
- Admin Emeritus

- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 8:25 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Robot Arm C
Why more than one?windu34 wrote:How many arms are you guys planning on building. If one, why?
'If you're the smartest person in the room, you're in the wrong room' - Unknown
-
windu34
- Staff Emeritus

- Posts: 1382
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
Re: Robot Arm C
can move objects faster thus reducing timeiwonder wrote:Why more than one?windu34 wrote:How many arms are you guys planning on building. If one, why?
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
-
bernard
- Administrator

- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: WA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 179 times
- Been thanked: 759 times
Re: Robot Arm C
I think some of the tasks that earn points will be enough of a challenge for many teams, and since they earn points would be more important to perfect. I think it's reasonable to experiment with multiple arms if a team has trouble getting all the objects in optimal locations in time (and the team already is controlling the arm to the best of its ability) or if a team can already successfully get all objects in optimal locations/positions and want to improve time.windu34 wrote:can move objects faster thus reducing timeiwonder wrote:Why more than one?windu34 wrote:How many arms are you guys planning on building. If one, why?
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
-
windu34
- Staff Emeritus

- Posts: 1382
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
Re: Robot Arm C
So is it reasonable to assume that most teams that do well at nats in robot arm will have 2 arms?
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
-
bernard
- Administrator

- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: WA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 179 times
- Been thanked: 759 times
Re: Robot Arm C
If it is very difficult to move all the objects to optimal locations/positions within the allowed time, probably. But whether other teams approach the build with only one or multiple arms is really important to your own performance.windu34 wrote:So is it reasonable to assume that most teams that do well at nats in robot arm will have 2 arms?
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
-
windu34
- Staff Emeritus

- Posts: 1382
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
Re: Robot Arm C
I just want to get an idea of other peoples prospective plansbernard wrote:If it is very difficult to move all the objects to optimal locations/positions within the allowed time, probably. But whether other teams approach the build with only one or multiple arms is really important to your own performance.windu34 wrote:So is it reasonable to assume that most teams that do well at nats in robot arm will have 2 arms?
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
-
jander14indoor
- Member

- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:54 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 28 times
Re: Robot Arm C
I haven't seen anyone run with this years objects, but here's some comments based on the last cycle of Robot Arm.
I saw a few double arm designs, only really an advantage if your robot was slow. Otherwise a big risk of interfering with each other.
Here's the things I saw that improved success.
- Stiffness. The robot has to move without bouncing and shaking to allow accurate actions.
- Speed. There's just a lot to do in the time allowed.
- Control method. I don't think you can beat the master/slave system for intuitive control. I've seen joy sticks do well, but not anywhere near as consistently and error free as master/slave systems.
- Power, we had some heavy objects last time, don't know if it will be as critical now.
- Clever use of end effectors. One team had a smallish arm, couldn't reach to the corners. But it's other features were good. They had a simple hook that they reached out and dragged the boxes close with. Reach no longer a problem.
Practice. The best robot arm is no good if you haven't used it before.
The observations of this ES anyway.
Jeff Anderson
Livonia MI
I saw a few double arm designs, only really an advantage if your robot was slow. Otherwise a big risk of interfering with each other.
Here's the things I saw that improved success.
- Stiffness. The robot has to move without bouncing and shaking to allow accurate actions.
- Speed. There's just a lot to do in the time allowed.
- Control method. I don't think you can beat the master/slave system for intuitive control. I've seen joy sticks do well, but not anywhere near as consistently and error free as master/slave systems.
- Power, we had some heavy objects last time, don't know if it will be as critical now.
- Clever use of end effectors. One team had a smallish arm, couldn't reach to the corners. But it's other features were good. They had a simple hook that they reached out and dragged the boxes close with. Reach no longer a problem.
Practice. The best robot arm is no good if you haven't used it before.
The observations of this ES anyway.
Jeff Anderson
Livonia MI
-
iwonder
- Admin Emeritus

- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 8:25 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Robot Arm C
I'm not sure if you recall but I know of at least one team that had a design capable of the full range of motion with three motors, but perhaps the best part is that they reduced the coordianate system from spherical coordinates to cylindrical, which simplifies the kinematics and motion control if you want to do some fancy positioning.jander14indoor wrote:I haven't seen anyone run with this years objects, but here's some comments based on the last cycle of Robot Arm.
I saw a few double arm designs, only really an advantage if your robot was slow. Otherwise a big risk of interfering with each other.
Here's the things I saw that improved success.
- Stiffness. The robot has to move without bouncing and shaking to allow accurate actions.
- Speed. There's just a lot to do in the time allowed.
- Control method. I don't think you can beat the master/slave system for intuitive control. I've seen joy sticks do well, but not anywhere near as consistently and error free as master/slave systems.
- Power, we had some heavy objects last time, don't know if it will be as critical now.
- Clever use of end effectors. One team had a smallish arm, couldn't reach to the corners. But it's other features were good. They had a simple hook that they reached out and dragged the boxes close with. Reach no longer a problem.
Practice. The best robot arm is no good if you haven't used it before.
The observations of this ES anyway.
Jeff Anderson
Livonia MI
'If you're the smartest person in the room, you're in the wrong room' - Unknown