Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
-
- Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 2:16 pm
- Division: B
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
So, I am new to this event and wondering if you should build an adjustable fulcrum, or if you should have one that is in a fixed position. Also, if you were to make an adjustable fulcrum, how specific are the measurements given? Thanks in advance.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:41 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CO
- Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Well, the driver is the gear that is the input. Maybe it's attached to a motor. It's the gear(s) attached to your bike pedals. The driven gear(s) is the output gear. It's on the back wheel of the bicycle.chinesesushi wrote:Would say driver/driven, because IMA is d(in)/d(out), so the input / output. But I'm not necessarily correct. I'm also not sure what you mean by driver or driven. Are you talking about the number of teeth? Or something else?hscmom wrote:Gear question: Is the gear ratio driver/driven or driven/driver? I have seen both on the internet. Can't decide what to teach our B team (and never learned it when I was in school!).
So, let's say that the driver has 10 teeth and the driven has 40 teeth. The gear ratio is either 4:1 or it is 1:4. Sigh. I've seen different formulae and explanations on the internet.
Homeschool Science Colorado since August 2008
-
- Member
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:57 pm
- Division: C
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
To me, it seems that it would depend on which gear you were applying it to. Like, instead of turning the pedals of your bike, what if you turned the wheels? Then the gear in the wheel would become the driver and the gear in the pedals becomes the driven. I guess it depends where you're applying the force, in which the MA would be number of teeth of driven / number of teeth of driver, I believe.hscmom wrote:Well, the driver is the gear that is the input. Maybe it's attached to a motor. It's the gear(s) attached to your bike pedals. The driven gear(s) is the output gear. It's on the back wheel of the bicycle.
So, let's say that the driver has 10 teeth and the driven has 40 teeth. The gear ratio is either 4:1 or it is 1:4. Sigh. I've seen different formulae and explanations on the internet.
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
You should only create problems, that only you know solutions to.
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
You should only create problems, that only you know solutions to.
-
- Member
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:57 pm
- Division: C
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
I would think I would build one with adjustable fulcrums because it gives a higher range of measurable mass. The specificity of the measurements depends on your design.Tropius Farmers-357 wrote:So, I am new to this event and wondering if you should build an adjustable fulcrum, or if you should have one that is in a fixed position. Also, if you were to make an adjustable fulcrum, how specific are the measurements given? Thanks in advance.
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
You should only create problems, that only you know solutions to.
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
You should only create problems, that only you know solutions to.
-
- Member
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 7:17 pm
- Division: B
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Hey I am wondering what’s people think about the beam length in rule 3a does the beam go from the fulcrum to the end or the length of the lever?
Last edited by helicpters_rule on Sun Nov 17, 2013 5:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Member
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:57 pm
- Division: C
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Length of leverhelicpters_rule wrote:Hey I am wondering what’s people think about the beam length in rule 3a does the beam go from the fulcrum to the mass or from length of the lever?
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
You should only create problems, that only you know solutions to.
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
You should only create problems, that only you know solutions to.
-
- Member
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 7:17 pm
- Division: B
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
I don't know if anyone said this but a great place to start is the naval course on the national simple machine web page and its interesting.
-
- Member
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 7:17 pm
- Division: B
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Just wondering what type of accuracy on there lever other people are getting on my practice test i get around 20-25 seconds and get usually less then 1 percent error.
-
- Member
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 7:17 pm
- Division: B
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
I don't know but most of the sources I have seen have been like http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hb ... cline.html so i think it that is the correct calculation and i am almost 100% sure its right. I hope that helps but if I am wrong someone please correct me.chinesesushi wrote:How would one find the ideal mechanical advantage of a wedge? The only reason I am asking this is because I used to believe it was the side length divided by thickness, according to http://iqa.evergreenps.org/science/phy_science/ma.html, but I recently saw another source that claimed it was the depth of penetration divided by thickness of wedge, according to http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hb ... cline.html. Which is correct? Please help!
-
- Member
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 7:17 pm
- Division: B
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
I used a fixed fulcrum because it was easy and the results i got have been pretty good but the moving fulcrum seams like something fun to try but for the event you can only have a certain range and ratio of the masses.chinesesushi wrote:I would think I would build one with adjustable fulcrums because it gives a higher range of measurable mass. The specificity of the measurements depends on your design.Tropius Farmers-357 wrote:So, I am new to this event and wondering if you should build an adjustable fulcrum, or if you should have one that is in a fixed position. Also, if you were to make an adjustable fulcrum, how specific are the measurements given? Thanks in advance.