Scioly.org

scienceisfunalil wrote:

TheSquaad wrote:

scienceisfunalil wrote:

Hi Windu! I wasn’t at Harvard but my B team was. They did say they had some issues with in tune notes reading out of tune. Could you perhaps elaborate on what you mean by not practicing under testing conditions? Do you mean just not practicing playing the note for 5 seconds? Thanks

I think he means that most people only tune their instrument with a traditional tuner, which has a low refresh rate and always centers on the actual pitch. Google science journal (which is what was used) picks up the pitch continuously, including any overtones and points with no audible pitch. Those often create huge spikes and bowls in the pitch curve, messing up the average pitch.

Ahh okay thanks. So you can solve the silences by building an instrument that can play continuously through the five seconds, but aren’t overtones unavoidable?

scienceisfunalil wrote:

TheSquaad wrote: Hi Windu! I wasn’t at Harvard but my B team was. They did say they had some issues with in tune notes reading out of tune. Could you perhaps elaborate on what you mean by not practicing under testing conditions? Do you mean just not practicing playing the note for 5 seconds? Thanks

I think he means that most people only tune their instrument with a traditional tuner, which has a low refresh rate and always centers on the actual pitch. Google science journal (which is what was used) picks up the pitch continuously, including any overtones and points with no audible pitch. Those often create huge spikes and bowls in the pitch curve, messing up the average pitch.