Scioly.org

Jaol wrote:

aherthabey wrote:

Unome wrote: I didn't do Invasives, but Astronomy was 29 multiple choice questions and one tiebreaker, and Dynamic Planet was 5 questions free-response with multiple sections, so it was like the equivalent of 20-25 questions multiple choice (still way too short of course). But that's how it tends to go; it's harder to get event sups when they can't rely on coaches.

Also, raw scores have been posted (except for Protein, and the page sizes are a bit off), so now we I can all go and look in-depth at all of our scores! (and potentially agonize over losing by a twentieth of a point)

Wow, six rules violations issued in GeoLogic Mapping! Do you know what that was about?

Calculators and notes supposedly...

aherthabey wrote:

Jaol wrote: Calculators and notes supposedly...

Both of which are allowed as per the rules, lol.

samlan16 wrote:

foreverphysics wrote:Yo boys, hope you enjoyed the 2016 tournament! You all did really well, and I hope you had fun.

That said, I ran the Forensics event and will likely be running it next year as well (unless astro frees up). Any feedback/thoughts are welcome and appreciated.

Bit of stats on 4n6--highest score was 87/124, with a median score of around 46/124. Average was in the mid-40's/124.
Scoring was 3 pts per powder/hair/fiber (19*3 = 57 total points), 10 points for chromatography (3 pts per chromatogram, 2 points for having correct/reasonable Rf calculations, 2 pts for actual correct answer), 8 pts for all the mass spec (2 pts/2 pts/4pts), 6 points for the fingerprints(2 pts per question), and 3 points for the last bug question for 84 total points, not including analysis. Crime analysis was 40 points (32% of total score, per the rules).

If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.

My reaction when seeing our score on 4n6:

Jaol wrote:

aherthabey wrote:

Jaol wrote: Calculators and notes supposedly...

Both of which are allowed as per the rules, lol.

Yeah I know. Maybe the notes weren't in a binder and maybe the calculators were programmable?

blueice wrote:Seems like the top 5 teams all improved their point scores drastically from last year leaving the rest of the field behind

samlan16 wrote:Seeing that this is basically the FSA students/alumni/coaches forum, I am happy to announce that my APCS final project will be a rendition of the DVD screensaver game. You are free to applaud.

Unome wrote:

samlan16 wrote:Seeing that this is basically the FSA students/alumni/coaches forum, I am happy to announce that my APCS final project will be a rendition of the DVD screensaver game. You are free to applaud.

*Applause*

Can you send me a copy when it's done?