Page 30 of 37

Re: Ongoing Contest(Scores)

Posted: April 21st, 2013, 2:26 pm
by sr243
Results for Illinois
http://avogadro.ws/hosted/il-state-b/public/results
seems like Daniel Wright who is the 1st place team

Re: Ongoing Contest(Scores)

Posted: April 21st, 2013, 3:40 pm
by UQOnyx
S4BB wrote:Back from Illinois State. Our boom broke early, and we ended up 3rd with a 1275 (7.92g holding 10098). I heard from one of our parents that the winning boom had a score of 2029.
Wow! Since it was coming from a parent, who may or may not have known the exact details, I am a bit skeptical, bit still if it is true, WOW! Congrats btw :D

Re: Ongoing Contest(Scores)

Posted: April 22nd, 2013, 4:32 pm
by balsa
can anyone post a photo of a tube boomilever, i think i understand how it works but i haven't seen one yet
thanks!

Re: Ongoing Contest(Scores)

Posted: April 22nd, 2013, 8:01 pm
by Rath4o1
Scores for RI
1st CranstonHigh School East 711.5( ME :D my worst boom too!)
2nd SmithfieldHigh School 680.93
3rd BarringtonHigh School 226.8
4th BishopHendrickenHigh School 192.46
5th Providence Career and Technical Academy 186.62
6th CranstonHigh School West 168.96

Re: Ongoing Contest(Scores)

Posted: April 23rd, 2013, 12:28 pm
by GeorgeInNePa
GeorgeInNePa wrote:
GeorgeInNePa wrote:
GeorgeInNePa wrote:"Tube" Boomilever

First try:
Boom weight-10.95g
Held-7714g
Efficiency Score- 704.5
Mounting block failure.

Second try:
Boom weight-12.25
Held-11316g
Efficiency Score-924
Tube failure due to alignment issues.

Third try will be under 12g and will hopefully hold more. We are learning with each build. :D
Third try (the boom from the first try with a new mounting block):
Boom weight-11.08
Held- 11512g
Efficiency Score- 1038.99
Tube failure.
Fourth try:

Boom weight- 11.46g
Held- 12069
Efficiency Score- 1053.14
Tube failure, in a way which you would expect with a tube in compression.

I "think" we can get this design over 1100, but not too much higher. We can remove a bit more weight, maybe get it down to 11.0g, but since we don't have a lot of time this is what it is.

I think that the weight held should actually be a bit higher, since we are using very large aquarium gravel and it takes a lot of time to get the weight in the bucket. A sand dispenser like they use at the larger events would allow more weight to be transferred before tube failure. ;)
New distal end block design and a very lightweight tube (3.8g)...
Fifth try:
Boom weight- 9.59g
Held- 11904g
Efficiency Score- 1241.29

This is the final design, we'll see how it goes on Friday.

Re: Ongoing Contest(Scores)

Posted: April 23rd, 2013, 3:57 pm
by GeorgeInNePa
UQOnyx wrote:Would anyone post a picture of a tube boomilever? I understand the basics, but I have never seen one before and might be a good example.
balsa wrote:can anyone post a photo of a tube boomilever, i think i understand how it works but i haven't seen one yet
thanks!
I will on Thursday...

Re: Ongoing Contest(Scores)

Posted: April 23rd, 2013, 9:41 pm
by mwloveslm
GeorgeInNePa wrote:
UQOnyx wrote:Would anyone post a picture of a tube boomilever? I understand the basics, but I have never seen one before and might be a good example.
balsa wrote:can anyone post a photo of a tube boomilever, i think i understand how it works but i haven't seen one yet
thanks!
I will on Thursday...
Yeah ahaha I would like to see the pictures also :D

Re: Ongoing Contest(Scores)

Posted: April 25th, 2013, 6:28 pm
by GeorgeInNePa
mwloveslm wrote:
GeorgeInNePa wrote:
UQOnyx wrote:Would anyone post a picture of a tube boomilever? I understand the basics, but I have never seen one before and might be a good example.
balsa wrote:can anyone post a photo of a tube boomilever, i think i understand how it works but i haven't seen one yet
thanks!
I will on Thursday...
Yeah ahaha I would like to see the pictures also :D
Image

Re: Ongoing Contest(Scores)

Posted: April 25th, 2013, 6:34 pm
by mwloveslm
wow nice....ok....do you think it might be possible for us to see a top view? If it's not a problem for you.....

Re: Ongoing Contest(Scores)

Posted: April 25th, 2013, 6:36 pm
by GeorgeInNePa
mwloveslm wrote:wow nice....ok....do you think it might be possible for us to see a top view? If it's not a problem for you.....
That's a pic of a broken one from Tuesday.

I'll get some pics of the competition boom tomorrow...