Gravity Vehicle C

Locked
_HenryHscioly_
Member
Member
Posts: 131
Joined: February 5th, 2011, 1:33 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by _HenryHscioly_ »

ahh...my orchestra teacher has a large bolt cutter.......
:lol:

Truth s I dunno where to find technology department at my school...i just know we have a tech program..and probably other stuff.. -fail-
i'll ask the robot arm coach at my school(bio chem teacher :) ) and if no luck, orch. teacher hehe
olympiaddict
Member
Member
Posts: 175
Joined: August 11th, 2012, 5:17 pm
Division: C
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by olympiaddict »

yeah, you should probably figure that out, it'll only be to your own benefit, and they can help you out lots. They probably have lots of really helpful tools too- check it out.
User avatar
mrsteven
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 815
Joined: March 13th, 2011, 5:40 pm
Division: C
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by mrsteven »

Ya!
I pretty much work exclusively at school in our robotics lab, i dont really have tools at my house, and they have some pretty cool ones at my disposal. After I get my robot built, of course (hehehehe)
2011 Helicopters State Runner-up
2012 Helicopters State Champion
2013 Robot Arm State Champion
iwonder
Admin Emeritus
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 1115
Joined: May 10th, 2011, 8:25 pm
Division: Grad
State: TX
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by iwonder »

Or there's always a hack saw...

If you don't mind, why such long axles?
'If you're the smartest person in the room, you're in the wrong room' - Unknown
_HenryHscioly_
Member
Member
Posts: 131
Joined: February 5th, 2011, 1:33 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by _HenryHscioly_ »

Maybe using a siting device? I saw a school use a very wide u-shaped wooden thing. It had a long piece of wood(20cmx5cm), and then on the front and back two pieces of wood(5cmx5cm) perpendicular with holes, and they kinda looked through those holes and did some aligning..
I went to a hardware store and asked for bearings, and they gave me some bearings, $15 for two. is there a way to measure/estimate how good they are...? when I spin the axle+2wheels(rollerblade wheels; 76mm diameter; 100grams each) it'll spin for ~5seconds
Last edited by _HenryHscioly_ on January 21st, 2013, 8:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
iwonder
Admin Emeritus
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 1115
Joined: May 10th, 2011, 8:25 pm
Division: Grad
State: TX
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by iwonder »

The bearings sound like they'll be fine for this event, but they're not anything spectacular... Sounds like solid reasoning with the longer axles, I was just curious :D
'If you're the smartest person in the room, you're in the wrong room' - Unknown
joeyjoejoe
Member
Member
Posts: 142
Joined: December 27th, 2012, 12:56 pm
Division: C
State: GA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by joeyjoejoe »

I (oops, I mean my son) just got this event dumped in his lap. We worked all weekend on building a car/ramp. Not a lot of time for the drawing board but it was similar to a middle school event (elastic launch vehicle) he had done so we had a lot of the necessary equipment. I knew from the onset that we needed to lower the launch height. We designed the car with as little friction as possible with what we had laying around since there isn't a lot of time to wait on internet orders this close to the event. We had read on this site that others had made the 10m max distance using heights in the .3-.4 meter range. We took some test runs last night and at .3 meters our car would only make it to the 7.5m mark. To make it the full 10m, we had to raise our ramp (an adjustable brachistocrone-ish beast) to app .45m. We are currently working on eliminating as much friction as possible but have a question (finally!) about the ramp:
Since our car starts at very near vertical (maybe 15 degrees off), aren't we be missing out on the extra potential energy we would get by having the entire car (instead of just the rear) at the launch height by instead launching the car from very near (but not exactly) horizontal?
Flavorflav
Member
Member
Posts: 1388
Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
Division: Grad
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by Flavorflav »

Whatever you lose in energy you'll more than make up for in time, which is what actually matters in the score. If the car starts nearer to horizontal it will accelerate more slowly, and it will take you a while just to get off the ramp. The solution to the energy problem is simply weight up the back, right over the rear axle.
User avatar
EastStroudsburg13
Admin Emeritus
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 3201
Joined: January 17th, 2009, 7:32 am
Division: Grad
State: MD
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 47 times
Been thanked: 204 times
Contact:

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by EastStroudsburg13 »

joeyjoejoe wrote:I (oops, I mean my son) just got this event dumped in his lap. We worked all weekend on building a car/ramp. Not a lot of time for the drawing board but it was similar to a middle school event (elastic launch vehicle) he had done so we had a lot of the necessary equipment. I knew from the onset that we needed to lower the launch height. We designed the car with as little friction as possible with what we had laying around since there isn't a lot of time to wait on internet orders this close to the event. We had read on this site that others had made the 10m max distance using heights in the .3-.4 meter range. We took some test runs last night and at .3 meters our car would only make it to the 7.5m mark. To make it the full 10m, we had to raise our ramp (an adjustable brachistocrone-ish beast) to app .45m. We are currently working on eliminating as much friction as possible but have a question (finally!) about the ramp:
Since our car starts at very near vertical (maybe 15 degrees off), aren't we be missing out on the extra potential energy we would get by having the entire car (instead of just the rear) at the launch height by instead launching the car from very near (but not exactly) horizontal?
Also, try to make sure that your son is doing the majority of the work. You can help with putting things together and making suggestions, but most of the brain work should be done by him Some teams don't like it very much if they find out that parents do most of the building events. ;)

That said, a .45 meter height is not the end of the world. In fact, I think heights of up to .6 are still pretty good, and if you get the vehicle to be very accurate, then you can even go close to .9 and still excel. As long as it's not super super tall and the car is reasonably accurate then you'll be okay!
East Stroudsburg South Class of 2012, Alumnus of JT Lambert, Drexel University Class of 2017

Helpful Links
Wiki
Wiki Pages that Need Work
FAQ and SciOly FAQ Wiki
Chat (See IRC Wiki for more info)
BBCode Wiki


So long, and thanks for all the Future Dictator titles!
lmatkovic3
Member
Member
Posts: 44
Joined: January 22nd, 2013, 7:49 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by lmatkovic3 »

If your ramp height is anywhere close to a meter, you'll have a lot of trouble doing well in the event.
Locked

Return to “2013 Build Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests