Anatomy B/C
- tclme elmo
- Member
- Posts: 177
- Joined: August 14th, 2009, 12:55 pm
- Division: B
- State: HI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Anatomy B/C
So what do we say? learn them or not learn them? How about the parts of the scapula? Or being able to label all the carpals and all the tarsals?
2011
Rustin Invitational - 1st
Solon Invitational - 8th
Regionals - 1st
States - 1st
Nationals - 11th
Rustin Invitational - 1st
Solon Invitational - 8th
Regionals - 1st
States - 1st
Nationals - 11th
- tclme elmo
- Member
- Posts: 177
- Joined: August 14th, 2009, 12:55 pm
- Division: B
- State: HI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Anatomy B/C
I'm confused. Is there a difference between protruberance and protuberance? on that site SOninja gave, it says protruberance, and I'm not sure that that's a word. And now I'm even more confused. What's the difference between that and a process?
2011
Rustin Invitational - 1st
Solon Invitational - 8th
Regionals - 1st
States - 1st
Nationals - 11th
Rustin Invitational - 1st
Solon Invitational - 8th
Regionals - 1st
States - 1st
Nationals - 11th
-
- Member
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Anatomy B/C
I'm going to eat a little crow here and reverse myself entirely. I have come to the conclusion that for C division at least you need to learn the processes and fossae, but not for the skeletal system. You have to know the origin and insertion of each of the listed muscles, for which you have to know the surface features of the bone. I still wouldn't go nuts with it, but as long as the feature is an attachment site for one of the listed muscles, I would have to say it's fair game.
To the best of my knowledge, there is no such thing as a protruberance. I believe whoever wrote that word was conflating "protuberance" and "protrusion."tclme elmo wrote:I'm confused. Is there a difference between protruberance and protuberance? on that site SOninja gave, it says protruberance, and I'm not sure that that's a word. And now I'm even more confused. What's the difference between that and a process?
- tclme elmo
- Member
- Posts: 177
- Joined: August 14th, 2009, 12:55 pm
- Division: B
- State: HI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Anatomy B/C
^^If that’s the case, then no offense SOninja, but the site you gave isn’t correct…and then so what’s the difference between protuberance and process?????? Gah!
2011
Rustin Invitational - 1st
Solon Invitational - 8th
Regionals - 1st
States - 1st
Nationals - 11th
Rustin Invitational - 1st
Solon Invitational - 8th
Regionals - 1st
States - 1st
Nationals - 11th
-
- Member
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Anatomy B/C
Process is a general term for a portion of the surface of the bone which is more elevated than the rest. Terms like protuberance, tubercle, malleolus etc. refer to types of processes.
- SOninja
- Member
- Posts: 76
- Joined: April 13th, 2009, 4:17 pm
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Anatomy B/C
...oops i just assumed that they meant protuberance & i didn't really study it because i thought its name seemed self-explanatory
it's not like i get my info from NIH
...and i haven't been tested on surface features of bone before
meh... you could try the "bone" pg on wikipedia and then skip to section "terminology"-
they have a simple chart there too, without "proturberance" or "protruberance" or whatever
yea, and what flavorflav said

it's not like i get my info from NIH

meh... you could try the "bone" pg on wikipedia and then skip to section "terminology"-
they have a simple chart there too, without "proturberance" or "protruberance" or whatever
yea, and what flavorflav said

2009 States: 
Crime busters
- 1st
*Reach for the Stars* - 1st
Anatomy - 7th
SO ♥ forever
"When it is dark enough, you can see the stars." -Charles Austin Beard

Crime busters

*Reach for the Stars* - 1st
Anatomy - 7th
SO ♥ forever
"When it is dark enough, you can see the stars." -Charles Austin Beard
- dudefromPRA
- Member
- Posts: 8
- Joined: January 22nd, 2010, 10:43 am
- Division: B
- State: CO
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Anatomy B/C
Does anyone know if they will do much muscle diseases at state. I might need to brush up on those, but I still know quite a bit about them. I got second at regionals and they only asked questions like what is this muscle and what is this bone and easy stuff like that.
¸,»·°¯PRA¯°·«,¸
2nd at Experimental Design.. twice, 1st at Trajectory and Ecology, 2nd at ornithology and anatomy, 3rd at science crime busters
2nd at Experimental Design.. twice, 1st at Trajectory and Ecology, 2nd at ornithology and anatomy, 3rd at science crime busters
-
- Member
- Posts: 172
- Joined: November 21st, 2008, 7:52 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: IN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Anatomy B/C
It really depends on who is running the event. A lot of my tests have been endocrine heavy but my semi state test was more skeletal and muscular.
- tclme elmo
- Member
- Posts: 177
- Joined: August 14th, 2009, 12:55 pm
- Division: B
- State: HI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Anatomy B/C
Well you definitely need to know stuff about the muscular dystrophies (I had questions about them at regionals). You need to know about polio, and also, myasthenia gravis.
2011
Rustin Invitational - 1st
Solon Invitational - 8th
Regionals - 1st
States - 1st
Nationals - 11th
Rustin Invitational - 1st
Solon Invitational - 8th
Regionals - 1st
States - 1st
Nationals - 11th
-
- Member
- Posts: 172
- Joined: November 21st, 2008, 7:52 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: IN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Anatomy B/C
They are actually pretty easy to learn if you use the appropriate source. I personally like to use https://health.google.com/health/ref/Myasthenia+gravis
Has everyone been looking at the insertions/origins of all of the muscles? It seems like some of the processes seem more important than others. For example. the origin of the biceps brachii is the coracoid process. A lot of processes serve as origins/insertions. Perhaps those are the processes that we should focus on.
Has everyone been looking at the insertions/origins of all of the muscles? It seems like some of the processes seem more important than others. For example. the origin of the biceps brachii is the coracoid process. A lot of processes serve as origins/insertions. Perhaps those are the processes that we should focus on.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests