Optics B/C

dlu66061
Member
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:38 pm
Division: B
State: KS
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Optics B/C

Post by dlu66061 »

Thanks for the quick response. I hope the upcoming regional contests will follow the rules.
JSGandora
Member
Member
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 12:09 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Optics B/C

Post by JSGandora »

There should really be a thickness restriction on the mirrors because at Tiger, the thickness of the blocks was ridiculously thick and it was quite a pain...the blocks were thicker than the mirror was wide...
cngu23
Member
Member
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 4:57 pm
Division: C
State: MD
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Optics B/C

Post by cngu23 »

You can put paper under the mirrors, I believe, so you can premake a few templates for almost all possible circumstances.
Marriotts Ridge 11-
Walter Johnson 09-11

13 MD Regional/State
Material S (2/-) TPS (-/2)
12 MD Regional/State
Remote S(2/6) Water Q(2/4) Optics (-/5)
11 MD Regional
Remote S(2) Eco(2) D Planet(3)
User avatar
hexagonaria
Member
Member
Posts: 212
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:00 pm
Division: C
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Optics B/C

Post by hexagonaria »

JSGandora wrote:There should really be a thickness restriction on the mirrors because at Tiger, the thickness of the blocks was ridiculously thick and it was quite a pain...the blocks were thicker than the mirror was wide...
I'm always worrying about that too. Some of my templates have the mirrors go right up against a corner of the lss, so if its too thick it won't line up correctly. there should really be some regulations on that
DFTBA
User avatar
piisamazing
Member
Member
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 3:52 pm
Division: C
State: NM
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Optics B/C

Post by piisamazing »

hexagonaria wrote:
JSGandora wrote:There should really be a thickness restriction on the mirrors because at Tiger, the thickness of the blocks was ridiculously thick and it was quite a pain...the blocks were thicker than the mirror was wide...
I'm always worrying about that too. Some of my templates have the mirrors go right up against a corner of the lss, so if its too thick it won't line up correctly. there should really be some regulations on that
i second that notion. at reigionals the blocks were really thick, and it was hard to get the right angle measurements
My common sense is the voice in the back of my head named Donald
Because no one listens to anyone named Donald???
EXACTLY!!!

Nemo spelt backwards is OMEN!!!!!
Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?
User avatar
SciBomb97
Member
Member
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:22 pm
Division: C
State: AL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Optics B/C

Post by SciBomb97 »

Last year at state, they gave us this mirror that was glued to a wood block that was about 2"thick, 3" tall, and like 16" long.
Thing like that make me stop to say "wtf?" (as in "what the fruit?").
-- -- --
"So whether you eat or drink or whatever you do, do it all for the glory of God." ~1 Corinthians 10:31~

They say that a smile can light up somebody's day
So today, smile
Shine a light in somebody's life
Be that light in the darkness
User avatar
foreverphysics
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 497
Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 8:41 pm
Division: Grad
State: AL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: Optics B/C

Post by foreverphysics »

Winning angle was like 52 degrees or something. It made me mad. We could have won. However, for all my fast thinking, I did not see the solution that was right in front of my eyes that entire time.
>.<
Image
Physics is difficult for 99% of the world's population because they don't understand it. The other 1% know too much.

"Physics is a psychiatrist?"
cngu23
Member
Member
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 4:57 pm
Division: C
State: MD
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Optics B/C

Post by cngu23 »

Well, to measure the angle, you could just line up the front of the mirror with the mirror line on your template, which would be the most accurate way.
Also, there is a real accurate setup using 4 mirrors at -45 degrees and 45 degrees, that could be used no matter how the obstacles are set up. This could be used a sort of a backup, since it only uses 4 mirrors, or you can change the last mirror, and add in the 5th mirror.
Marriotts Ridge 11-
Walter Johnson 09-11

13 MD Regional/State
Material S (2/-) TPS (-/2)
12 MD Regional/State
Remote S(2/6) Water Q(2/4) Optics (-/5)
11 MD Regional
Remote S(2) Eco(2) D Planet(3)
User avatar
Seracon
Member
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 8:14 am
Division: Grad
State: MN
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Optics B/C

Post by Seracon »

Hey, just a quick question regarding what to study for State. What exactly is Young's experiment and how does it relate to interposition/superposition of waves? Is it related to path difference?
Thanks!
MN Geologic Mapping Regional & State Coordinator
Gopher Science Olympiad Invitational Co-Chair (Div B)
http://sciolyumn.wordpress.com/about/
User avatar
hexagonaria
Member
Member
Posts: 212
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:00 pm
Division: C
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Optics B/C

Post by hexagonaria »

cngu23 wrote:Well, to measure the angle, you could just line up the front of the mirror with the mirror line on your template, which would be the most accurate way.
Also, there is a real accurate setup using 4 mirrors at -45 degrees and 45 degrees, that could be used no matter how the obstacles are set up. This could be used a sort of a backup, since it only uses 4 mirrors, or you can change the last mirror, and add in the 5th mirror.
That's exactly what I did, and I got 39.5/40 points. Just out of curiosity, what programs do you guys make your templates with? Or do you draw them?
DFTBA

Return to “2012 Lab Events”