Lets make sure we aren't confusing things here. Several folks have mentioned reducing pitch and then mentioned old and new rotor specs with vertical spacing AND tip width reduced. The net effect meant they actually didn't change pitch much!
example:
Danny Smith wrote:<SNIP>the rotors i originally made are 1 and 5/8ths inches verticle spacing and four inches tip to tip.
Figuiring i needed lower pitched, smaller rotors, i made new ones that are 1.25 verticle spacing and 3.5 inches tip to tip. these flew better than the first, but still only about twenty seconds. <SNIP>
Yes the pitch on the new rotor is lower, but NOT much. First prop is about 20 inch pitch, second is 18 inch. Only 10 percent lower. And in the process you reduced blade area, probably reducing lift.
So, pitch is a function of vertical seperation AND tip width (on our simple two spar triangular blades). Unless you are doing a proper desing of experiments array, you should only change one factor at a time, so if playing with pitch, reduce vertical spacing and leave tip width alone.
Jeff Anderson
Livonia, MI