Mousetrap Vehicle C
-
- Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:27 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
What kind of times are people getting right now? What do you guys think will be the top times at nationals?
2016 SONT: 5th Place Scrambler
2017 MIT: 1st Place Electric Vehicle
2018 MIT: 1st Place Helicopter, 6th Place Mousetrap Vehicle
2018 UPenn: 2nd Place Mousetrap Vehicle, 2nd Place Mission Possible, 3rd Place Helicopter
pkhsekar@gmail.com
2017 MIT: 1st Place Electric Vehicle
2018 MIT: 1st Place Helicopter, 6th Place Mousetrap Vehicle
2018 UPenn: 2nd Place Mousetrap Vehicle, 2nd Place Mission Possible, 3rd Place Helicopter
pkhsekar@gmail.com
-
- Member
- Posts: 539
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 3:46 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NC
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
We're about 9-10 seconds right now, and I've heard that the better teams at MIT got around 8-10. I'm actually kind of surprised by these high times. I expected the top teams at MIT to be closer to 6-7 seconds, but I guess given the relatively large distance, and the fact that it's still early in the season, the 8-10 reported for top 6 at MIT makes sense.thesenotes wrote:What kind of times are people getting right now? What do you guys think will be the top times at nationals?
Of course, for most vehicles (if not all) there is a tradeoff between accuracy and time. And accuracy will almost always be more important, until you get within a centimeter or two consistently I'm guessing.
-
- Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:27 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
Yeah, my feeling is that top 10 at nats will be within 2 cm of the target, and 1st place will have a crazy fast time like 4 seconds.Alex-RCHS wrote:We're about 9-10 seconds right now, and I've heard that the better teams at MIT got around 8-10. I'm actually kind of surprised by these high times. I expected the top teams at MIT to be closer to 6-7 seconds, but I guess given the relatively large distance, and the fact that it's still early in the season, the 8-10 reported for top 6 at MIT makes sense.thesenotes wrote:What kind of times are people getting right now? What do you guys think will be the top times at nationals?
Of course, for most vehicles (if not all) there is a tradeoff between accuracy and time. And accuracy will almost always be more important, until you get within a centimeter or two consistently I'm guessing.
2016 SONT: 5th Place Scrambler
2017 MIT: 1st Place Electric Vehicle
2018 MIT: 1st Place Helicopter, 6th Place Mousetrap Vehicle
2018 UPenn: 2nd Place Mousetrap Vehicle, 2nd Place Mission Possible, 3rd Place Helicopter
pkhsekar@gmail.com
2017 MIT: 1st Place Electric Vehicle
2018 MIT: 1st Place Helicopter, 6th Place Mousetrap Vehicle
2018 UPenn: 2nd Place Mousetrap Vehicle, 2nd Place Mission Possible, 3rd Place Helicopter
pkhsekar@gmail.com
-
- Staff Emeritus
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 31 times
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
I agree with this. I think there is potential for a sub 6 pt score at nats. Will someone actually achieve it? That depends on whether or not there is a pair of students out there determined enough. Top 6 at nats will likely be <~10 points.thesenotes wrote:Yeah, my feeling is that top 10 at nats will be within 2 cm of the target, and 1st place will have a crazy fast time like 4 seconds.Alex-RCHS wrote:We're about 9-10 seconds right now, and I've heard that the better teams at MIT got around 8-10. I'm actually kind of surprised by these high times. I expected the top teams at MIT to be closer to 6-7 seconds, but I guess given the relatively large distance, and the fact that it's still early in the season, the 8-10 reported for top 6 at MIT makes sense.thesenotes wrote:What kind of times are people getting right now? What do you guys think will be the top times at nationals?
Of course, for most vehicles (if not all) there is a tradeoff between accuracy and time. And accuracy will almost always be more important, until you get within a centimeter or two consistently I'm guessing.
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Member
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Member
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
-
- Member
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2016 11:29 am
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
Agreed, and I'd think top 6 would be dead on with placings decided by time.thesenotes wrote:Yeah, my feeling is that top 10 at nats will be within 2 cm of the target, and 1st place will have a crazy fast time like 4 seconds.Alex-RCHS wrote:We're about 9-10 seconds right now, and I've heard that the better teams at MIT got around 8-10. I'm actually kind of surprised by these high times. I expected the top teams at MIT to be closer to 6-7 seconds, but I guess given the relatively large distance, and the fact that it's still early in the season, the 8-10 reported for top 6 at MIT makes sense.thesenotes wrote:What kind of times are people getting right now? What do you guys think will be the top times at nationals?
Of course, for most vehicles (if not all) there is a tradeoff between accuracy and time. And accuracy will almost always be more important, until you get within a centimeter or two consistently I'm guessing.
is 4 seconds achievable? I would have thought the fastest possible time would have to be 6 or more. averaging 2 m/s with only two mousetraps seems pretty unfeasible.
2019 Sounds of Music National Champion
-
- Member
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2017 2:33 pm
- Division: C
- State: MO
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
I can get 4 secounds on mine but it cant get it to reach the ctp. Right now mine goes 8 secounts and hits right on point to 1 cm off4Head wrote:Agreed, and I'd think top 6 would be dead on with placings decided by time.thesenotes wrote:Yeah, my feeling is that top 10 at nats will be within 2 cm of the target, and 1st place will have a crazy fast time like 4 seconds.Alex-RCHS wrote: We're about 9-10 seconds right now, and I've heard that the better teams at MIT got around 8-10. I'm actually kind of surprised by these high times. I expected the top teams at MIT to be closer to 6-7 seconds, but I guess given the relatively large distance, and the fact that it's still early in the season, the 8-10 reported for top 6 at MIT makes sense.
Of course, for most vehicles (if not all) there is a tradeoff between accuracy and time. And accuracy will almost always be more important, until you get within a centimeter or two consistently I'm guessing.
is 4 seconds achievable? I would have thought the fastest possible time would have to be 6 or more. averaging 2 m/s with only two mousetraps seems pretty unfeasible.
2020 events: codebusters, towers, gravity vehicle, ping pong paracute



-
- Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:27 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
Wow, how were you able to get 4 seconds? I'm guessing you used balsa? Was it still accurate at those speeds?Otkrlj wrote:I can get 4 secounds on mine but it cant get it to reach the ctp. Right now mine goes 8 secounts and hits right on point to 1 cm off4Head wrote:Agreed, and I'd think top 6 would be dead on with placings decided by time.thesenotes wrote:
Yeah, my feeling is that top 10 at nats will be within 2 cm of the target, and 1st place will have a crazy fast time like 4 seconds.
is 4 seconds achievable? I would have thought the fastest possible time would have to be 6 or more. averaging 2 m/s with only two mousetraps seems pretty unfeasible.
2016 SONT: 5th Place Scrambler
2017 MIT: 1st Place Electric Vehicle
2018 MIT: 1st Place Helicopter, 6th Place Mousetrap Vehicle
2018 UPenn: 2nd Place Mousetrap Vehicle, 2nd Place Mission Possible, 3rd Place Helicopter
pkhsekar@gmail.com
2017 MIT: 1st Place Electric Vehicle
2018 MIT: 1st Place Helicopter, 6th Place Mousetrap Vehicle
2018 UPenn: 2nd Place Mousetrap Vehicle, 2nd Place Mission Possible, 3rd Place Helicopter
pkhsekar@gmail.com
-
- Member
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2017 2:33 pm
- Division: C
- State: MO
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
Ya we used balsa. It was not very accurate. The best we got it was 2 cm offthesenotes wrote:Wow, how were you able to get 4 seconds? I'm guessing you used balsa? Was it still accurate at those speeds?Otkrlj wrote:I can get 4 secounds on mine but it cant get it to reach the ctp. Right now mine goes 8 secounts and hits right on point to 1 cm off4Head wrote: Agreed, and I'd think top 6 would be dead on with placings decided by time.
is 4 seconds achievable? I would have thought the fastest possible time would have to be 6 or more. averaging 2 m/s with only two mousetraps seems pretty unfeasible.
2020 events: codebusters, towers, gravity vehicle, ping pong paracute



-
- Member
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2017 2:33 pm
- Division: C
- State: MO
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
Otkrlj wrote:Ya we used balsa. It was not very accurate. The best we got it was 2 cm off. The avarage distance was 5 to 15 cm offthesenotes wrote:Wow, how were you able to get 4 seconds? I'm guessing you used balsa? Was it still accurate at those speeds?Otkrlj wrote: I can get 4 secounds on mine but it cant get it to reach the ctp. Right now mine goes 8 secounts and hits right on point to 1 cm off
2020 events: codebusters, towers, gravity vehicle, ping pong paracute



-
- Staff Emeritus
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 31 times
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
2cm off is actually pretty accurate. In my experience, its not possible to consistently get any more accurate than ~2cm on an average run due to extraneous variables out of your control. If you are consistently getting ~2cm off, start learning how to adjust for the second run and work on lowering that time score.Otkrlj wrote:Ya we used balsa. It was not very accurate. The best we got it was 2 cm offthesenotes wrote:Wow, how were you able to get 4 seconds? I'm guessing you used balsa? Was it still accurate at those speeds?Otkrlj wrote: I can get 4 secounds on mine but it cant get it to reach the ctp. Right now mine goes 8 secounts and hits right on point to 1 cm off
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Member
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Member
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage