Page 27 of 28
Re: Scrambler C
Posted: May 19th, 2015, 2:21 pm
by ChocolateLove
I am right behind the competitor who launches the car, the one with the pink shirt on. I have the fro! Also awesome runs! I remember seeing them and I thought, "that was freaking insane."
Edit: In the first video it is much easier to actually see me!
Re: Scrambler C
Posted: May 19th, 2015, 2:26 pm
by InfiniCuber
ChocolateLove wrote:I am right behind the competitor who launches the car, the one with the pink shirt on. I have the fro! Also awesome runs! I remember seeing them and I thought, "that was freaking insane."
Edit: In the first video it is much easier to actually see me!
I cannot find you for the life of me xD
Re: Scrambler C
Posted: May 19th, 2015, 2:51 pm
by ChocolateLove
Hahahahaha, I will screenshot myself and post it!
Re: Scrambler C
Posted: May 19th, 2015, 2:52 pm
by ChocolateLove
InfiniCuber wrote:
I cannot find you for the life of me xD
It's a me, Chris!
Re: Scrambler C
Posted: May 19th, 2015, 3:01 pm
by bernard
ChocolateLove wrote:InfiniCuber wrote:
I cannot find you for the life of me xD
It's a me, Chris!
It's a
you!
Re: Scrambler C
Posted: May 19th, 2015, 3:17 pm
by ChocolateLove
bernard wrote:ChocolateLove wrote:InfiniCuber wrote:
I cannot find you for the life of me xD
It's a me, Chris!
It's a
you!
I really had a feeling someone would bring that up! Hahaha, Yep that's me! Very up close and personal!
Re: Scrambler C
Posted: May 19th, 2015, 3:19 pm
by bernard
ChocolateLove wrote:bernard wrote:It's a
you!
I really had a feeling someone would bring that up! Hahaha, Yep that's me! Very up close and personal!
Were the camera people very close to you, or was it just zoomed in a lot? I heard about some camera people getting really close to competitors while they were trying to focus and test devices...
Re: Scrambler C
Posted: May 19th, 2015, 3:28 pm
by ChocolateLove
bernard wrote:
Were the camera people very close to you, or was it just zoomed in a lot? I heard about some camera people getting really close to competitors while they were trying to focus and test devices...
If I remember correctly the camera people just zoomed in A LOT. Like an obscene amount. They were standing next to the supervisors who were like off the side of the starting box from last year.
Re: Scrambler C
Posted: May 21st, 2015, 6:07 am
by BroNiSciGuy
wjnewhouse wrote:Mr. Pratt, the event supervisor, will probably post the distances/times/scores for the top 10 scramblers sometime over the next couple days to this thread (at least that's what he did last year).
Here you go. Track was 9.8 m. Top
17 teams went for the bonus and were successful. Another 4 went for it on at least one run and were not.
Place - Tm # - Time - Distance - Score
1 - 19 - 1.75 - 5.5 - 5077.00
2 - 11 - 2.56 - 3.3 - 5071.00
3 - 2 - 2.48 - 6.7 - 5068.50
4 - 27 - 1.56 - 16.1 - 5068.30 (their other run's time of 1.47 was the fastest at Nats)
5 - 7 - 2.66 - 6.6 - 5066.80
6 - 23 - 1.65 - 18.4 - 5065.10
7 - 32 - 2.56 - 10.0 - 5064.40
8 - 3 - 2.83 - 8.0 - 5063.70
9 - 8 - 3.22 - 5.4 - 5062.40
10 - 15 - 3.73 - 6.5 - 5056.20
So what did you think of the bonus?
BTW, it's Bro. Nigel!
Re: Scrambler C
Posted: May 21st, 2015, 6:16 am
by InfiniCuber
BroNiSciGuy wrote:Here you go. Track was 9.8 m. Top 17 teams went for the bonus and were successful. Another 4 went for it on at least one run and were not.
Place - Tm # - Time - Distance - Score
1 - 19 - 1.75 - 5.5 - 5077.00
2 - 11 - 2.56 - 3.3 - 5071.00
3 - 2 - 2.48 - 6.7 - 5068.50
4 - 27 - 1.56 - 16.1 - 5068.30 (their other run's time of 1.47 was the fastest at Nats)
5 - 7 - 2.66 - 6.6 - 5066.80
6 - 23 - 1.65 - 18.4 - 5065.10
7 - 32 - 2.56 - 10.0 - 5064.40
8 - 3 - 2.83 - 8.0 - 5063.70
9 - 8 - 3.22 - 5.4 - 5062.40
10 - 15 - 3.73 - 6.5 - 5056.20
So what did you think of the bonus?
BTW, it's Bro. Nigel!
I thought the bonus was a brilliant challenge. It was fun trying to figure out how to do it and master it, and I loved that it gave the event a new aspect that seemed difficult at first, and it really was all about practice! Challenges are always great
