So SLM, what you're saying is that the first pattern is more efficient?SLM wrote:In terms of material usage, both patterns seem to use the same amount. In terms of strength, however, there are differences. Here is a simple analysis showing which pattern works better for the chimney and why.hpfananu wrote:So a few weeks ago I was watching that old Towers video that's in the SOINC store. There's one section where someone analyzes some of the first towers at the ?1994 competition. What was kind of interesting was that this person said that you should have bracings all meet at one point, similar to this.![]()
(Mind the awful image but I think you can understand the idea)
Wouldn't this leave a lot of the section of the other legs unbraced? If this was done all around.
Instead, would
![]()
be beneficial instead? It doesn't leave more of the leg unbraced but they don't all meet at one point. Thoughts?
A Comparison Between two Bracing Patterns
Designs
-
- Member
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:01 pm
- Division: C
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Designs
-
- Member
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 2:24 pm
- Division: Grad
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Designs
I cannot tell from the drawings. It seems to me that the first drawing shows bracings on two adjacent sides of the tower whereas the second drawing is of two opposite sides. You need to know the orientation of the bracings on all four sides of the tower to decide which scenario offers more stability.flyingwatermelon wrote:SLM wrote:In terms of material usage, both patterns seem to use the same amount. In terms of strength, however, there are differences. Here is a simple analysis showing which pattern works better for the chimney and why.hpfananu wrote:So a few weeks ago I was watching that old Towers video that's in the SOINC store. There's one section where someone analyzes some of the first towers at the ?1994 competition. What was kind of interesting was that this person said that you should have bracings all meet at one point, similar to this.![]()
(Mind the awful image but I think you can understand the idea)
Wouldn't this leave a lot of the section of the other legs unbraced? If this was done all around.
Instead, would
![]()
be beneficial instead? It doesn't leave more of the leg unbraced but they don't all meet at one point. Thoughts?
A Comparison Between two Bracing Patterns
So SLM, what you're saying is that the first pattern is more efficient?
-
- Member
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 10:26 am
- Division: C
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Designs
Hey, What is the average mass of a 24" 1/8*1/8 basswood stick. I know that it's about 1.5 for balsa for 36"
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 5:40 pm
- Division: C
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Designs
Really? From my sources I get a pretty consistent baseline of 1.3-1.4thsom wrote:Hey, What is the average mass of a 24" 1/8*1/8 basswood stick. I know that it's about 1.5 for balsa for 36"
^ Which is good, b/c there isn't really much use for anything above 1.3
2011 Helicopters State Runner-up
2012 Helicopters State Champion
2013 Robot Arm State Champion
2012 Helicopters State Champion
2013 Robot Arm State Champion
-
- Member
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 10:26 am
- Division: C
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Designs
right around that ballpark, but what about basswood?mrsteven wrote:Really? From my sources I get a pretty consistent baseline of 1.3-1.4thsom wrote:Hey, What is the average mass of a 24" 1/8*1/8 basswood stick. I know that it's about 1.5 for balsa for 36"
^ Which is good, b/c there isn't really much use for anything above 1.3
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 5:40 pm
- Division: C
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Designs
I never find the need for it. I get fairly constantly at and under 9 grams holding full load with balsa
2011 Helicopters State Runner-up
2012 Helicopters State Champion
2013 Robot Arm State Champion
2012 Helicopters State Champion
2013 Robot Arm State Champion
-
- Member
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 10:26 am
- Division: C
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Designs
True, true, yet i think I have found a 6 or so gram design that could hold all at 70 cm, if only i had this AHA moment 1 week ago....mrsteven wrote:I never find the need for it. I get fairly constantly at and under 9 grams holding full load with balsa
-
- Member
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 7:32 pm
- Division: C
- State: NC
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Designs
About where have any Division C builders here had your base legs massed at? I'm always under 2.5 grams, usually hovering right at about 2 grams. But, I seem to be getting to heavy from bracing, since most of my bases come out at 3.4-4g with the different modifications I have had. Where is everyone else at? Our team is hitting around 8-9g at 70cm, holding 15kg.
- LKN
NCSSM '13
NCSSM '13
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 5:40 pm
- Division: C
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Designs
I'm at the same place although my season is over so im not really improving anymore...LKN wrote:About where have any Division C builders here had your base legs massed at? I'm always under 2.5 grams, usually hovering right at about 2 grams. But, I seem to be getting to heavy from bracing, since most of my bases come out at 3.4-4g with the different modifications I have had. Where is everyone else at? Our team is hitting around 8-9g at 70cm, holding 15kg.
2011 Helicopters State Runner-up
2012 Helicopters State Champion
2013 Robot Arm State Champion
2012 Helicopters State Champion
2013 Robot Arm State Champion