Page 26 of 28
Re: Efficiencies
Posted: May 6th, 2011, 1:19 pm
by havenguy
Sorry, double post (don't know how that happened). Anyway, thanks jander.
Re: Efficiencies
Posted: May 6th, 2011, 4:49 pm
by jander14indoor
Well, since you have seen on this list numbers in the mid 40s are coming from Wisconsin, Michigan and Ohio. I'd be surprised if you didn't see similar numbers from NY, NC and California. Probably a few other states will send teams capable of that level of performance. Maybe in the top quarter? Maybe medal, but not very likely.
Jeff Anderson
Livonia, MI
Re: Efficiencies
Posted: May 12th, 2011, 6:05 pm
by havenguy
googlyfrog wrote:The highest at our state was 32, but I have heard of towers in the mid to upper 40s.
Wow! Thats amazing.
Re: Efficiencies
Posted: May 12th, 2011, 6:18 pm
by dragonfly
FINALLY on track (took me until past States, unfortunately
). Good luck at nationals, everybody!
Re: Efficiencies
Posted: May 22nd, 2011, 4:08 am
by Littleboy
What were the scores (weights of towers and held too) at nats?
Re: Efficiencies
Posted: May 22nd, 2011, 7:58 am
by jander14indoor
Div B high scores broke 50
Div C high scores were in the mid-40s
Jeff Anderson
Livonia, MI
Re: Efficiencies
Posted: May 22nd, 2011, 8:38 am
by lllazar
Very nice, what was top 10 breakdown? Did low 30s break top 10?
Re: Efficiencies
Posted: May 22nd, 2011, 10:28 am
by hpfananu
We got...35 around and 6th in Div. B.
Re: Efficiencies
Posted: May 22nd, 2011, 2:32 pm
by lucwilder42
I got second with 45.271, anybody know troys score?
Re: Efficiencies
Posted: May 22nd, 2011, 5:10 pm
by nejanimb
Slightly over 48, I believe.