Scioly.org

Three people mentioned that video, here http://goo.gl/pNub
Cybert mentioned it, then soobsession quoted Cybert, and then AlphaTuari quoted soobsession.

However, AlphaTuari was the only one who referred to it as "awesome". My money is now on Alpha.

It's possible, but it could also reference JYC... who do we know that did JYC, hmmm?

A LOT of people do JYC. I think its referring to OKGO- This Too Shall Pass.

I beg to differ- It's B division, and not many people do it- just builders, really.

Yes, but a video that indirectly refers to an event that several people do isn't a very good self clue. Just think about it a little... "Junkyard Challenge" isn't a very good self clue, and especially if its refered to through a Youtube Video of a Rube Goldburg machine.

I still really think its AlphaTauri- could someone accuse her please?

Also, I want to confirm zyzzyva's suspicions, I am the assassinator.

>_>
<_<

If you're not the assassinator, you shouldn't try to be misleading. It's still a possibility, though. Robodude's almost always a suspect. Grammar search reveals he has never used the word "role" before...

Assassinator wrote:In my games, no one goes to waste. The informants will play a roll soon enough.

He also likes to give a "roll" to informants... but can't blatantly do it because it would give away his identity.
In all, the misdirects and writing style certainly lend themselves to robodude, but that could be a clever ploy.

Now, if I'm reading this, I'm thinking, this is probably some personal thing, I'm just going to ignore this. Well, 1) I'm not suggesting you accuse yet. Keep your eye out for him, that's all. B) I try not to say IT'S [person] ACCUSE NOW! That's just pointless and 90% of the time it's not them. Just watch him, that's all. There are, of course, several things that don't make it seem as if robodude is the assassinator.

That's all. Carry on.

One more thing about robodude that's similar to the idea it was random. Both times brobo was assassinator I caught him. He does not likeme for this. Me not being here = goodtiming for him.

*sigh*
I can see that there is no way to escape suspicion... and while the suspicion is pinned on me, it can't be pinned on the true assassinator. Therefore, I beg you to accuse me. Please! Just accuse me! Its the only way to prove my innocence!
And before someone raises the enlargement "Oh, its reverse psychology," I would like to make one more argument against me. If you go back through #49 and #52, you will see that I was a suspect almost from the very beginning- #49 when I said "crowman" instead of "croman" and #52 when I used the wrong timezone. Even though I was a suspect from the beginning, I was able to avoid accusation for a really long time. Is this not exactly the same thing that happened? I look really suspicious, and yet I haven't been accused.

Just one more thing to get someone to accuse me: in both #49 and #52, I was the first informant, and I was always very punctual. Just saying.

Now, ACCUSE ME!

EDIT: Just as long as its not fmtiger that accuses me...

Sorry I didn't help that much on that clue guys, i've been pretty busy getting all packed for when i move into my new dorm this week. Which actually brings me to my point. I'm getting to the point where school is around the corner, and im still prepping, so if someone wants to take my officer spot, i would really appreciate it. I can still try and help out with clues, i just think someone else can put my accusations and protects to better use.

If i had to guess on the identity of the sassy, i would have to say based on facts, i have nothing. But my hunch tells me robodude. The first self clue would make sense, since he was behind "the twist" in #50, but i dont know about the second.

EDIT: Didn't see robo's post. If it will help anybody, i'll get it out of the way as my last officer action. I accuse robodude because of zz's evidence.

robodude wrote:*sigh*
I can see that there is no way to escape suspicion... and while the suspicion is pinned on me, it can't be pinned on the true assassinator. Therefore, I beg you to accuse me. Please! Just accuse me! Its the only way to prove my innocence!
And before someone raises the enlargement "Oh, its reverse psychology," I would like to make one more argument against me. If you go back through #49 and #52, you will see that I was a suspect almost from the very beginning- #49 when I said "crowman" instead of "croman" and #52 when I used the wrong timezone. Even though I was a suspect from the beginning, I was able to avoid accusation for a really long time. Is this not exactly the same thing that happened? I look really suspicious, and yet I haven't been accused.

Just one more thing to get someone to accuse me: in both #49 and #52, I was the first informant, and I was always very punctual. Just saying.

Now, ACCUSE ME!

EDIT: Just as long as its not fmtiger that accuses me...

You'd prefer to have us give up and waste an accusation on you than at least attempt to prove your innocence? There are several points that you could accentuate that would work in your favor. Anyone who has done debate knows that all is never lost.