Lmao no problem...x16VOLTx wrote:lmao, I'm sorry. I didn't mean to freak on you... The end of the third nine weeks was today, I have been so stressed to get all of my work done. As for Physics, lol.... I wish you could be in APC Physics with me, lol... If you saw me in that class, you wouldn't believe that I was SciO worthy, hahaha...
I found out today our team placed 8th at regionals, thought that was pretty cool... As for my car, if it is flawed, then it reflects its creator, lol... I'll never reach perfection, but I;ll try my best =) Again, sorry for being so defensive...
We all have those moments
(I haven't even taken physics 1

Anyways, moving on to the car. I personally think that the pin-axle design (number 3 on the wiki) is the optimal design, as I've never seen an actually competitive car not running that design. However, Troy HS claimed to me that they have a prototype of a double mousetrap (in opposite directions) design that works (I'm assuming that they use a ratchet-pawl and wind both axles before hand, but I've never seen it), but pin-axle is still better, as that is what they used in competition, over their prototype. When using that design (with a long bar) you don't even need vinyl records, btw...
Are you going to states? Or is your season over?