Page 24 of 30
Re: Scioly Assassination 79: Elementary My Dear Watson
Posted: August 27th, 2011, 4:18 pm
by Luo
I protect EASTstroudsburg because he posted the 600th comment in YDRC.
To clear up any controversy about paleonaps's accusation, I'll go ahead and accuse RandomPerson. I hope the sassy is reasonable enough not to charge both of us with an accusation. If the sassy won't accept paleonaps's accusation, count it as mine. Otherwise, naps's accusation stands.
Re: Scioly Assassination 79: Elementary My Dear Watson
Posted: August 27th, 2011, 5:22 pm
by RandomPerson
Yeah I'm not quite naive enough to pick myself, sorry.
Re: Scioly Assassination 79: Elementary My Dear Watson
Posted: August 27th, 2011, 5:29 pm
by Luo
RandomPerson wrote:Yeah I'm not quite naive enough to pick myself, sorry.

That is rather unfortunate.
Re: Scioly Assassination 79: Elementary My Dear Watson
Posted: August 27th, 2011, 5:35 pm
by paleonaps
Cwap.
Well, I think that tiger and Z are good accusations.
Re: Scioly Assassination 79: Elementary My Dear Watson
Posted: August 27th, 2011, 5:38 pm
by The Eviscerator
I would like to reiterate the idea that Sweetcoop might be worth an accusation. That is all.
Re: Scioly Assassination 79: Elementary My Dear Watson
Posted: August 27th, 2011, 6:31 pm
by TheGenius
paleonaps wrote:Cwap.
Well, I think that tiger and Z are good accusations.
zyzzyva can't be the assassinator.
TheGenius wrote:Assassinator isn't zyzzyva.
See?
Reasoning (size one font for the heck of it): The assassinator has posted after midnight, and band starts at 7:00. I don't recall anyone falling over on the field due to sleep deprivation.
The Eviscerator wrote:I would like to reiterate the idea that Sweetcoop might be worth an accusation. That is all.
I don't think so. sweetcoop has done that in the past when he wasn't the assassinator. And if he was the assassinator, wouldn't it be more advantageous to stay in the game and ensure that the officer spot was useless?
Re: Scioly Assassination 79: Elementary My Dear Watson
Posted: August 27th, 2011, 6:55 pm
by foreverphysics
Any other ideas about the "600" thing? It's a pronic number, as well as a Harshad number. Ring any bells? Nothing important happened in 600 AD, but in 600 BC, Laozi wrote the Tao Te Ching, accordingly. I think that was the most important thing that happened...any ideas?
Re: Scioly Assassination 79: Elementary My Dear Watson
Posted: August 27th, 2011, 11:16 pm
by Assassinator
My dearest Holmes,
I regret to inform you of the death of one of your Irregulars. Paleonaps was a valuable ally of yours. He assisted you even when he was not one of your Irregulars, and was eventually promoted for his dilligence. However he replaced the wrong person. For he entered this deadly game with two black marks already against him. The third proved fatal.
May paleonaps rest in peace on this bloody night, for his last night on earth certainly was not. He put up a valiant fight during the assassination attempt. Apparently he heard me as I crept behind him with my blackjack at the ready. My swing only glanced off his arm and his wild punch was enough to throw me off him for enough time for him to run. Sadly the chase did not last long, as I quickly cornered him in a blind alley. The second time I was smart enough to use my gun.
Now you are down to two. Good luck on the clue Holmes.
Sincerely,
The Assassinator
Re: Scioly Assassination 79: Elementary My Dear Watson
Posted: August 28th, 2011, 12:41 am
by Kokonilly
...and WOW does this time reflect badly on me. If the sassy's trying to frame me, they're doing it fairly well with language, etc.
But I really don't want to see the sassy win this game, so Luo and Alpha, remember that time I was really nice to you? Er... that one time? Yeah. You remember. So don't accuse me. Because that would be a waste of an accusation. Well, I mean, you may accuse me if you like... just know it'll be for naught. And - let's face it - I wouldn't post at that time if I were sassy.
Re: Scioly Assassination 79: Elementary My Dear Watson
Posted: August 28th, 2011, 7:40 am
by TheGenius
Identity clue, anyone?