Re: Your Daily Random Comment
Posted: January 3rd, 2018, 5:36 pm
I still find Poe's Law to be the truest rule I've ever heard.NeilMehta wrote:w h o o s hmaxxxxx wrote:whooshFroggie wrote: It’s your, not you’re. Do your own research.
I still find Poe's Law to be the truest rule I've ever heard.NeilMehta wrote:w h o o s hmaxxxxx wrote:whooshFroggie wrote: It’s your, not you’re. Do your own research.
Heck yeah!!Alex-RCHS wrote:You know when your trying to make a (terrible) joke and it just spirals out of control? Well, that's what happened here. Let's change the subject:
Who got snow today? I did!
yeah no school!Pettywap wrote:Heck yeah!!Alex-RCHS wrote:You know when your trying to make a (terrible) joke and it just spirals out of control? Well, that's what happened here. Let's change the subject:
Who got snow today? I did!
Honestly really interesting. Some not so surprising (North Dakota, Michigan, NC all very high) and some quite surprising (NH, ID, AK fairly high up, CA and TX pretty far down) results. Now what I would want to see is if there really is a correlation between this and recent nats results for the states.Unome wrote:I was bored, so I decided to compare the number of Science Olympiad teams in each state in 2017 to the state's population - a relative measure showing how the state's SO size compares to it's population (out of the total number of teams in the US/total population of the US). The numerical value is the ratio between the two.
*cough**cough*those no-shows were in trial events*cough**cough*Alex-RCHS wrote:I just found out that in 2010 my school placed 15th at nationals despite getting dead last (61 points) in 3 different events. If they had been able to average even a mere 36th in each of those events, they would have moved up to 10th place (would have been our school's first time getting a top-10 trophy at nats). Fun fact -- the previous year we tied for 10th and lost the tiebreaker (ended up with 11th). So still no nats trophy. :cry: Here's the kicker: The school we tied with? That was Mira Loma.
oofJohn Richardsim wrote:*cough**cough*those no-shows were in trial events*cough**cough*Alex-RCHS wrote:I just found out that in 2010 my school placed 15th at nationals despite getting dead last (61 points) in 3 different events. If they had been able to average even a mere 36th in each of those events, they would have moved up to 10th place (would have been our school's first time getting a top-10 trophy at nats). Fun fact -- the previous year we tied for 10th and lost the tiebreaker (ended up with 11th). So still no nats trophy.Here's the kicker: The school we tied with? That was Mira Loma.
Happy birthday!Pettywap wrote:Jan 10th. ITS MY BIRTHDAY!!!!