General Discussion
-
thsom
- Member

- Posts: 241
- Joined: December 27th, 2011, 10:26 am
- Division: C
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: General Discussion
What glue do you guys use brand wise. I understand ca glue is good and I have tested with it, not brittle OR heavy. I have managed to build a 7.5 gram tower with it so it can't be too heavy and its strong too. If you recommend ducco and ambroid, where do you buy them and can you provide a link?
-
Balsa Man
- Coach

- Posts: 1318
- Joined: November 13th, 2008, 3:01 am
- Division: C
- State: CO
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: General Discussion
Just a terminology thing, to make sure we're all on the same page. "Efficiency" (as in structural efficiency) is the weight carried divided by the weight of the tower. Score is efficiency (in kg/gr) times a height factor- for regionals, height minus 5; for State height minus 15. So, Stevenson had a score of ~120. If the tower was 70cm tall, carried all 15kg, that would mean a weight of just over 8.1 grams - an efficiency of 15/8.1 = 1.582 (in the units of kg/gr - actually 1,581- the load was 1,581 times the weight of tower); if shorter, would have been lighter- at 60cm, would have had to be about 6.9 grams- an efficiency of 2.174)lucwilder42 wrote:How tall?thsom wrote:Are any of you guys familiar with stevenson? They had an amazing tower with an efficiency of about 120!!!
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
Fort Collins, CO
-
thsom
- Member

- Posts: 241
- Joined: December 27th, 2011, 10:26 am
- Division: C
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: General Discussion
Thank you and yes it was a score of 120. Though I believe i have a design with a score of 130 that may work. Now the actual challenge comes to precision when building.Balsa Man wrote:Just a terminology thing, to make sure we're all on the same page. "Efficiency" (as in structural efficiency) is the weight carried divided by the weight of the tower. Score is efficiency (in kg/gr) times a height factor- for regionals, height minus 5; for State height minus 15. So, Stevenson had a score of ~120. If the tower was 70cm tall, carried all 15kg, that would mean a weight of just over 8.1 grams - an efficiency of 15/8.1 = 1.582 (in the units of kg/gr - actually 1,581- the load was 1,581 times the weight of tower); if shorter, would have been lighter- at 60cm, would have had to be about 6.9 grams- an efficiency of 2.174)lucwilder42 wrote:How tall?thsom wrote:Are any of you guys familiar with stevenson? They had an amazing tower with an efficiency of about 120!!!
- foreverphysics
- Moderator

- Posts: 497
- Joined: May 20th, 2011, 8:41 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: AL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 69 times
- Contact:
Re: General Discussion
It's very adequate.thsom wrote:Sorry for double posting, but is "the original superglue" adequate for this, or is it too heavy or too weak because that's what I have at home.
-
thsom
- Member

- Posts: 241
- Joined: December 27th, 2011, 10:26 am
- Division: C
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: General Discussion
Is it good in comparison to thin CA? Is it lighter or heavier or weaker/stronger. I'm talking about 8.5-9.5 gram 70 cm tall towers holding near all so they're pretty light, but I don't feel like going to a store to buy my normal ca glue if i already have this here.foreverphysics wrote:It's very adequate.thsom wrote:Sorry for double posting, but is "the original superglue" adequate for this, or is it too heavy or too weak because that's what I have at home.
- foreverphysics
- Moderator

- Posts: 497
- Joined: May 20th, 2011, 8:41 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: AL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 69 times
- Contact:
Re: General Discussion
thsom wrote:Is it good in comparison to thin CA? Is it lighter or heavier or weaker/stronger. I'm talking about 8.5-9.5 gram 70 cm tall towers holding near all so they're pretty light, but I don't feel like going to a store to buy my normal ca glue if i already have this here.foreverphysics wrote:It's very adequate.thsom wrote:Sorry for double posting, but is "the original superglue" adequate for this, or is it too heavy or too weak because that's what I have at home.

That blue one in the picture is the best. You can get it in HobbyTown. I would also recommend getting the accelerator (the brown one). If all else fails, get the purple one. But only get that under extreme duress. That blue type is strong, efficient, and lighter than the purple. This was something we learned through a lot of experimentation...
It is under the label "Insta Cure". Make sure it's BLUE and not some other random color.
- lucwilder42
- Member

- Posts: 114
- Joined: March 30th, 2010, 10:01 am
- Division: Grad
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: General Discussion
I must disagree with you. First, the use of accelerator in towers is a bad idea, as it dries the glue before the curing process is complete. CA takes about 24 hours to fully cure. Second, the purple stuff works perfectly. It's held together at least two medaling structures at nationals, I trust it completely.foreverphysics wrote:thsom wrote:foreverphysics wrote: That blue one in the picture is the best. You can get it in HobbyTown. I would also recommend getting the accelerator (the brown one). If all else fails, get the purple one. But only get that under extreme duress. That blue type is strong, efficient, and lighter than the purple. This was something we learned through a lot of experimentation...
It is under the label "Insta Cure". Make sure it's BLUE and not some other random color.
I'm just here to build bridges
-
Balsa Man
- Coach

- Posts: 1318
- Joined: November 13th, 2008, 3:01 am
- Division: C
- State: CO
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: General Discussion
And I would agree with you, lucwilder42. I would add that the blue/Insta Cure is generally a bad choice. There are a few times and specific situations where its what you want, but for most, its not. It goes off really fast, which can be a real problem.lucwilder42 wrote:I must disagree with you. First, the use of accelerator in towers is a bad idea, as it dries the glue before the curing process is complete. CA takes about 24 hours to fully cure. Second, the purple stuff works perfectly. It's held together at least two medaling structures at nationals, I trust it completely.foreverphysics wrote:foreverphysics wrote: That blue one in the picture is the best. You can get it in HobbyTown. I would also recommend getting the accelerator (the brown one). If all else fails, get the purple one. But only get that under extreme duress. That blue type is strong, efficient, and lighter than the purple. This was something we learned through a lot of experimentation...
It is under the label "Insta Cure". Make sure it's BLUE and not some other random color.
CAs come in a variety of speeds and viscosities. There are many brands- I suspect, but haven't done the research, that there are only a few actual manufacturers that actually make the stuff, and a lot of different suppliers that get it in bulk and bottle it under their brand.
In general, the thinner, runnier, lower viscosity, the quicker it "goes off." At the other end of the spectrum, are thicker/slower preparations. In general, having time to position (and re-position if needed) pieces before the glue goes off helps for a good build.
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
Fort Collins, CO
- foreverphysics
- Moderator

- Posts: 497
- Joined: May 20th, 2011, 8:41 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: AL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 69 times
- Contact:
Re: General Discussion
It has worked best for our team. I'm just speaking from my own personal experience.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
