General Discussion

Locked
thsom
Member
Member
Posts: 241
Joined: December 27th, 2011, 10:26 am
Division: C
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: General Discussion

Post by thsom »

What glue do you guys use brand wise. I understand ca glue is good and I have tested with it, not brittle OR heavy. I have managed to build a 7.5 gram tower with it so it can't be too heavy and its strong too. If you recommend ducco and ambroid, where do you buy them and can you provide a link?
Balsa Man
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1318
Joined: November 13th, 2008, 3:01 am
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: General Discussion

Post by Balsa Man »

lucwilder42 wrote:
thsom wrote:Are any of you guys familiar with stevenson? They had an amazing tower with an efficiency of about 120!!!
How tall?
Just a terminology thing, to make sure we're all on the same page. "Efficiency" (as in structural efficiency) is the weight carried divided by the weight of the tower. Score is efficiency (in kg/gr) times a height factor- for regionals, height minus 5; for State height minus 15. So, Stevenson had a score of ~120. If the tower was 70cm tall, carried all 15kg, that would mean a weight of just over 8.1 grams - an efficiency of 15/8.1 = 1.582 (in the units of kg/gr - actually 1,581- the load was 1,581 times the weight of tower); if shorter, would have been lighter- at 60cm, would have had to be about 6.9 grams- an efficiency of 2.174)
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
thsom
Member
Member
Posts: 241
Joined: December 27th, 2011, 10:26 am
Division: C
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: General Discussion

Post by thsom »

Balsa Man wrote:
lucwilder42 wrote:
thsom wrote:Are any of you guys familiar with stevenson? They had an amazing tower with an efficiency of about 120!!!
How tall?
Just a terminology thing, to make sure we're all on the same page. "Efficiency" (as in structural efficiency) is the weight carried divided by the weight of the tower. Score is efficiency (in kg/gr) times a height factor- for regionals, height minus 5; for State height minus 15. So, Stevenson had a score of ~120. If the tower was 70cm tall, carried all 15kg, that would mean a weight of just over 8.1 grams - an efficiency of 15/8.1 = 1.582 (in the units of kg/gr - actually 1,581- the load was 1,581 times the weight of tower); if shorter, would have been lighter- at 60cm, would have had to be about 6.9 grams- an efficiency of 2.174)
Thank you and yes it was a score of 120. Though I believe i have a design with a score of 130 that may work. Now the actual challenge comes to precision when building.
thsom
Member
Member
Posts: 241
Joined: December 27th, 2011, 10:26 am
Division: C
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: General Discussion

Post by thsom »

Sorry for double posting, but is "the original superglue" adequate for this, or is it too heavy or too weak because that's what I have at home.
User avatar
foreverphysics
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 497
Joined: May 20th, 2011, 8:41 pm
Division: Grad
State: AL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 69 times
Contact:

Re: General Discussion

Post by foreverphysics »

thsom wrote:Sorry for double posting, but is "the original superglue" adequate for this, or is it too heavy or too weak because that's what I have at home.
It's very adequate.
Image
Physics is difficult for 99% of the world's population because they don't understand it. The other 1% know too much.

"Physics is a psychiatrist?"
thsom
Member
Member
Posts: 241
Joined: December 27th, 2011, 10:26 am
Division: C
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: General Discussion

Post by thsom »

foreverphysics wrote:
thsom wrote:Sorry for double posting, but is "the original superglue" adequate for this, or is it too heavy or too weak because that's what I have at home.
It's very adequate.
Is it good in comparison to thin CA? Is it lighter or heavier or weaker/stronger. I'm talking about 8.5-9.5 gram 70 cm tall towers holding near all so they're pretty light, but I don't feel like going to a store to buy my normal ca glue if i already have this here.
User avatar
foreverphysics
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 497
Joined: May 20th, 2011, 8:41 pm
Division: Grad
State: AL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 69 times
Contact:

Re: General Discussion

Post by foreverphysics »

thsom wrote:
foreverphysics wrote:
thsom wrote:Sorry for double posting, but is "the original superglue" adequate for this, or is it too heavy or too weak because that's what I have at home.
It's very adequate.
Is it good in comparison to thin CA? Is it lighter or heavier or weaker/stronger. I'm talking about 8.5-9.5 gram 70 cm tall towers holding near all so they're pretty light, but I don't feel like going to a store to buy my normal ca glue if i already have this here.
Image
That blue one in the picture is the best. You can get it in HobbyTown. I would also recommend getting the accelerator (the brown one). If all else fails, get the purple one. But only get that under extreme duress. That blue type is strong, efficient, and lighter than the purple. This was something we learned through a lot of experimentation...
It is under the label "Insta Cure". Make sure it's BLUE and not some other random color.
Image
Physics is difficult for 99% of the world's population because they don't understand it. The other 1% know too much.

"Physics is a psychiatrist?"
User avatar
lucwilder42
Member
Member
Posts: 114
Joined: March 30th, 2010, 10:01 am
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: General Discussion

Post by lucwilder42 »

foreverphysics wrote:
thsom wrote:
foreverphysics wrote: That blue one in the picture is the best. You can get it in HobbyTown. I would also recommend getting the accelerator (the brown one). If all else fails, get the purple one. But only get that under extreme duress. That blue type is strong, efficient, and lighter than the purple. This was something we learned through a lot of experimentation...
It is under the label "Insta Cure". Make sure it's BLUE and not some other random color.
I must disagree with you. First, the use of accelerator in towers is a bad idea, as it dries the glue before the curing process is complete. CA takes about 24 hours to fully cure. Second, the purple stuff works perfectly. It's held together at least two medaling structures at nationals, I trust it completely.
I'm just here to build bridges
Balsa Man
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1318
Joined: November 13th, 2008, 3:01 am
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: General Discussion

Post by Balsa Man »

lucwilder42 wrote:
foreverphysics wrote:
foreverphysics wrote: That blue one in the picture is the best. You can get it in HobbyTown. I would also recommend getting the accelerator (the brown one). If all else fails, get the purple one. But only get that under extreme duress. That blue type is strong, efficient, and lighter than the purple. This was something we learned through a lot of experimentation...
It is under the label "Insta Cure". Make sure it's BLUE and not some other random color.
I must disagree with you. First, the use of accelerator in towers is a bad idea, as it dries the glue before the curing process is complete. CA takes about 24 hours to fully cure. Second, the purple stuff works perfectly. It's held together at least two medaling structures at nationals, I trust it completely.
And I would agree with you, lucwilder42. I would add that the blue/Insta Cure is generally a bad choice. There are a few times and specific situations where its what you want, but for most, its not. It goes off really fast, which can be a real problem.

CAs come in a variety of speeds and viscosities. There are many brands- I suspect, but haven't done the research, that there are only a few actual manufacturers that actually make the stuff, and a lot of different suppliers that get it in bulk and bottle it under their brand.
In general, the thinner, runnier, lower viscosity, the quicker it "goes off." At the other end of the spectrum, are thicker/slower preparations. In general, having time to position (and re-position if needed) pieces before the glue goes off helps for a good build.
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
User avatar
foreverphysics
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 497
Joined: May 20th, 2011, 8:41 pm
Division: Grad
State: AL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 69 times
Contact:

Re: General Discussion

Post by foreverphysics »

It has worked best for our team. I'm just speaking from my own personal experience.
Image
Physics is difficult for 99% of the world's population because they don't understand it. The other 1% know too much.

"Physics is a psychiatrist?"
Locked

Return to “Towers B/C”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests