Re: 2018 National Tournament: Colorado State University
Posted: May 20th, 2018, 3:15 pm
Did people anticipate community MS to finish 3rd?
Science Olympiad Student Center
https://scioly.org:443/forums/
megrimlockawesom wrote:Everyone underestimated Piedmont imo. Good thing we were able to pull 6th to prove them wrong!
Almost everyone.East's computer wrote:6. Piedmont
gg and rip my Div predictionsEastStroudsburg13 wrote:megrimlockawesom wrote:Everyone underestimated Piedmont imo. Good thing we were able to pull 6th to prove them wrong!Almost everyone.East's computer wrote:6. Piedmont
Thanks! Congrats to Mason for an amazing first year performance and congratulations to everyone else that competed this yearName wrote:Wow that was interesting. Congrats to troy and Solon!
Also congrats to Mason for 2nd in thier first year at nats!
Awards was a roller coaster from start to finish. The score predictor spreadsheets had us between 6th and 15th at various times. Many events we hoped to medal in...we didn't. In the end though, consistency did pay off.Unome wrote:Interestingly, the 3rd place teams in both divisions had less medals than is typical for their scores and ranks - Harriton with 7 and Community with 5. Notably, Community finished between 7th and 11th in 13 different events.
Lots of teams showed great consistency in the tournament. Enloe and Camas each has 3 medals but placed in 10th and 11thUnome wrote:Interestingly, the 3rd place teams in both divisions had less medals than is typical for their scores and ranks - Harriton with 7 and Community with 5. Notably, Community finished between 7th and 11th in 13 different events.