A link to a picture of the device I made for our team.davidkim2106 wrote:Anyone have any pictures of their device?
Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: WA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 176 times
- Been thanked: 752 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
-
- Member
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:27 pm
- Division: C
- State: AL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Keep in mind I said pictures of their devicesboomvroomshroom wrote:You could go in the image gallery.davidkim2106 wrote:Anyone have any pictures of their device?

Thanks bernardbernard wrote:A link to a picture of the device I made for our team.davidkim2106 wrote:Anyone have any pictures of their device?

EDIT: nvm i see them, thanks

Sup.
-
- Member
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:57 pm
- Division: C
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
I believe those are levels that he uses to see whether the system of levers is in equilibrium or not, for more accuracy.Thanks bernardbernard wrote:A link to a picture of the device I made for our team.davidkim2106 wrote:Anyone have any pictures of their device?Could you explain what the little things above the levers are? Also, where would you attach the masses? I don't see hooks
EDIT: nvm i see them, thanks
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
You should only create problems, that only you know solutions to.
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
You should only create problems, that only you know solutions to.
-
- Member
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 7:09 am
- Division: B
- State: KY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
bernard wrote:A link to a picture of the device I made for our team.davidkim2106 wrote:Anyone have any pictures of their device?
Bernard, I understand how the first class lever can rest in equilibrium, but how about the second class lever? Do you have a fixed counter-weight attached to it to the right of the fulcrum or do you adjust the first class lever to the point where it can balance the second class lever? Anyone else with idea please help. We just got someone new on this event. Thanks.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: WA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 176 times
- Been thanked: 752 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Yes, a fixed counterweight would let the second class lever rest in equilibrium, which would hopefully allow for more accurate predictions.goodcheer wrote:bernard wrote:A link to a picture of the device I made for our team.davidkim2106 wrote:Anyone have any pictures of their device?
Bernard, I understand how the first class lever can rest in equilibrium, but how about the second class lever? Do you have a fixed counter-weight attached to it to the right of the fulcrum or do you adjust the first class lever to the point where it can balance the second class lever? Anyone else with idea please help. We just got someone new on this event. Thanks.
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 7:42 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
So... Apparently, there was a conflict, and now, I'm doing Simple Machines. What kinds of things should I do for simple machine concepts and terminology?
-
- Member
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
But then it might not be considered a true 2nd class lever anymore... more like a hybrid 1st/2nd class lever....bernard wrote: Yes, a fixed counterweight would let the second class lever rest in equilibrium, which would hopefully allow for more accurate predictions.
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: WA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 176 times
- Been thanked: 752 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
By the FAQ that states the the 40cm of the class 2 lever is just the distance between the fulcrum and effort points, could I call an 80cm beam a class 2 lever if the load and effort are on the same side of the fulcrum? I suppose the picture of our device I posted a while ago could be considered a hybrid since there is 5cm of meterstick opposite to the 40cm class 2 lever.chalker wrote:But then it might not be considered a true 2nd class lever anymore... more like a hybrid 1st/2nd class lever....bernard wrote: Yes, a fixed counterweight would let the second class lever rest in equilibrium, which would hopefully allow for more accurate predictions.
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
-
- Member
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 12:56 pm
- Division: C
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Even with that definition, I would consider the class 2 lever actually a class 1 lever. It never even crossed our minds to build ours that way. Placing a counterbalance on a class 1 lever doesn't change its type but doing so with a class 2 arguably does.
-
- Member
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
As always, this isn't the place for official clarifications / comments.... Note that the purpose of that FAQ was to make it easier for people to construct the levers. It's REALLY hard to come up with a design that has the fulcrum exactly at the edge of the beam for example. Having a little bit of extra material overhanging the fulcrum doesn't significantly impact the functionality of the lever.bernard wrote: By the FAQ that states the the 40cm of the class 2 lever is just the distance between the fulcrum and effort points, could I call an 80cm beam a class 2 lever if the load and effort are on the same side of the fulcrum? I suppose the picture of our device I posted a while ago could be considered a hybrid since there is 5cm of meterstick opposite to the 40cm class 2 lever.
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair