Its not my tower, found it on google images...I don't do towers, but it looked similar to the ones being built by my teammatesRandom Human wrote:Hey windu34windu34 wrote:This is a good oneRandom Human wrote: I have built a couple towers but the issue now is I want some photo of scioly towers so I can get some ideas to improve my tower and compare mine to yours. Find my flaws and improve myself.
So can anybody post a picture of a decent tower?
Thanks for posting your tower.
My question now is: How much did that tower weigh and how much did it hold. Also, what division are you in?
Pictures, Videos, and Scores
-
windu34
- Staff Emeritus

- Posts: 1382
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores
-
Unome
- Moderator

- Posts: 4315
- Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 219 times
- Been thanked: 76 times
Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores
Google gives all of the answers: link.windu34 wrote:Its not my tower, found it on google images...I don't do towers, but it looked similar to the ones being built by my teammatesRandom Human wrote:Hey windu34windu34 wrote: This is a good one
Thanks for posting your tower.
My question now is: How much did that tower weigh and how much did it hold. Also, what division are you in?
Note that this tower follows the old 2012 rules, where the tower had a width limitation above a certain height (hence the shape).
-
Balsa Man
- Coach

- Posts: 1318
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:01 am
- Division: C
- State: CO
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores
That's really important to understand. Under the 2012 rules, the bottom had to span a 20x20cm opening, but for a C-Div tower, at 30cm above the base (40cm above for B-Div), the tower had to fit inside an 8cm diameter circle. There is no such requirement this year; there is no reason to build a '2-piece' tower this year, you had to in 2012. There is no advantage, there is only disadvantages. The straight-leg configuration as shown in the drawing is what you want; period. The only photos out there that I've seen this year are from 2012. Interesting history, but not applicable to this year's rules/competition.Unome wrote:Google gives all of the answers: link.windu34 wrote:Its not my tower, found it on google images...I don't do towers, but it looked similar to the ones being built by my teammatesRandom Human wrote:
Hey windu34
Thanks for posting your tower.
My question now is: How much did that tower weigh and how much did it hold. Also, what division are you in?
Note that this tower follows the old 2012 rules, where the tower had a width limitation above a certain height (hence the shape).
-
JZhang1
- Member

- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:26 am
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores
Tested a tower yesterday
Div. B - NY
Bonus - Yes
Load Scored - 12900 g +2000 g
Mass of Tower - 7.5 g
Efficiency - 1986.67
Div. B - NY
Bonus - Yes
Load Scored - 12900 g +2000 g
Mass of Tower - 7.5 g
Efficiency - 1986.67
-
Random Human
- Member

- Posts: 153
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 11:39 am
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores
Nice, did you do a three sided or 4 sided design?JZhang1 wrote:Tested a tower yesterday
Div. B - NY
Bonus - Yes
Load Scored - 12900 g +2000 g
Mass of Tower - 7.5 g
Efficiency - 1986.67
-
JZhang1
- Member

- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:26 am
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores
4 LegsRandom Human wrote:Nice, did you do a three sided or 4 sided design?JZhang1 wrote:Tested a tower yesterday
Div. B - NY
Bonus - Yes
Load Scored - 12900 g +2000 g
Mass of Tower - 7.5 g
Efficiency - 1986.67
-
Random Human
- Member

- Posts: 153
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 11:39 am
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores
Cool!JZhang1 wrote:4 LegsRandom Human wrote:Nice, did you do a three sided or 4 sided design?JZhang1 wrote:Tested a tower yesterday
Div. B - NY
Bonus - Yes
Load Scored - 12900 g +2000 g
Mass of Tower - 7.5 g
Efficiency - 1986.67
-
leinad520
- Member

- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2016 6:59 am
- Division: C
- State: NC
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores
Are you Division B or C?Clueless Builder wrote:First tower of the season.
Mass: 8.4g
Mass held: >15kg (probably around 25-30kg)
20-30kg is based off of estimates. We only had a max 500g scale so it is a pain to measure more.
Ratio = 15000/8.4 = 1786
Our ghetto chain ended up breaking before the tower so it may have held more, but it was already over max weight so it doesn't matter.
To put that score into perspective my best bridge last year was around 1500.
-
bernard
- Administrator

- Posts: 2412
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: WA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 756 times
Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores
Congratulations, "Clueless Builder!" Did you attempt the bonus?Clueless Builder wrote:I'm C.
My newest tower held 15kg at 6.4g.
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
