Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

User avatar
blindmewithscience
Member
Member
Posts: 44
Joined: October 2nd, 2014, 8:57 pm
Division: C
State: NV
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by blindmewithscience »

Hmm, so if speed will need to be emphasized this year, what are the best designs for being fast while still retaining a high level of accuracy?
Nevada state SO occurs on tau/2 day. Support the correct mathematical constant with all tauists.
http://www.tauday.com/tau-manifesto

Event: Regional/States
Astronomy: x/:(
Bungee: 3/3
Compound Machines: x/1
TPS: x/:(
JonB
Coach
Coach
Posts: 345
Joined: March 11th, 2014, 12:00 pm
Division: C
State: FL
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by JonB »

blindmewithscience wrote:Hmm, so if speed will need to be emphasized this year, what are the best designs for being fast while still retaining a high level of accuracy?

Accuracy is more important this year, but I believe that there will be a greater separation in the times it will take teams to get the ratios. I do not think we are going to see much of an overall increase in the accuracy of the devices (but, I have been surprised before).

All of the devices are basically going to work the same way because of the class of levers we have to use in this event. The "devil is in the details" for this event. Figuring out ways to quickly and consistently get your measurements and then creating fast calculations is where a majority of the time preparing for this event should be spent.
User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4320
Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 82 times

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by Unome »

JonB wrote:
blindmewithscience wrote:Hmm, so if speed will need to be emphasized this year, what are the best designs for being fast while still retaining a high level of accuracy?

Accuracy is more important this year, but I believe that there will be a greater separation in the times it will take teams to get the ratios. I do not think we are going to see much of an overall increase in the accuracy of the devices (but, I have been surprised before).

All of the devices are basically going to work the same way because of the class of levers we have to use in this event. The "devil is in the details" for this event. Figuring out ways to quickly and consistently get your measurements and then creating fast calculations is where a majority of the time preparing for this event should be spent.
That is the most informative statement I have ever heard about this event :)
Userpage

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.
User avatar
raxu
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 41
Joined: October 9th, 2014, 6:54 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by raxu »

Quick Question: How much do you usually need to get for top scores in states for Compound Machines? The maximum is 100, but the U.S. record is probably at most 99... 12 seconds and 1.25% error? I'm not doing that...
Richard
Events done Div. B: Simple Machines <3, Shock Value.
Events done Div. C: Astronomy <3 , It's About Time, Forensics, Optics, Remote Sensing, Game On, Materials Science, Mousetrap Vehicle, Fermi Questions, Thermodynamics.
User avatar
raxu
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 41
Joined: October 9th, 2014, 6:54 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by raxu »

Also, what is the intended way of putting the 1st class + 2nd class lever? I was thinking about "abandoning" the second class lever - connect it to the fructum and just use the 1st class one, because that sounds 10 times simpler in math. But is there like a nifty design with those 2 levers that can just do the ratio in 1 go?
Richard
Events done Div. B: Simple Machines <3, Shock Value.
Events done Div. C: Astronomy <3 , It's About Time, Forensics, Optics, Remote Sensing, Game On, Materials Science, Mousetrap Vehicle, Fermi Questions, Thermodynamics.
User avatar
chinesesushi
Member
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: September 17th, 2013, 4:57 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by chinesesushi »

raxu wrote:Quick Question: How much do you usually need to get for top scores in states for Compound Machines? The maximum is 100, but the U.S. record is probably at most 99... 12 seconds and 1.25% error? I'm not doing that...
The changed it this year, but last year it was essentially just finding the ratio between 2 of them, so and that took the best teams ~15-25 seconds with varying degrees of accuracy. Top team had accuracy of ~1.5% and a time around ~22 s.
raxu wrote:Also, what is the intended way of putting the 1st class + 2nd class lever? I was thinking about "abandoning" the second class lever - connect it to the fructum and just use the 1st class one, because that sounds 10 times simpler in math. But is there like a nifty design with those 2 levers that can just do the ratio in 1 go?
There is no "intended way," but they have to be connected in series to each other. So the output of the 1st class lever must be in the input of the 2nd class lever. Or vice-versa. Rule 3a: The device must be a class 1 lever connected directly in series to a class 2 lever, each with a single beam of length less than or equal to 40.0 cm. So you can't just "abandon" the second class lever, or else they would have just called the event Simple Machines and have it be the same as the Div. B event.
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
You should only create problems, that only you know solutions to.
User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4320
Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 82 times

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by Unome »

raxu wrote:Quick Question: How much do you usually need to get for top scores in states for Compound Machines? The maximum is 100, but the U.S. record is probably at most 99... 12 seconds and 1.25% error? I'm not doing that...
At Booth Invitational last year, we got ~95 and the top team got ~98 I think (Auburn JHS, 5th in that event at Nats). But you're Div C, so the scores will probably be closer to 96-ish. It depends on what state you're in.
Userpage

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.
JonB
Coach
Coach
Posts: 345
Joined: March 11th, 2014, 12:00 pm
Division: C
State: FL
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by JonB »

raxu wrote: But is there like a nifty design with those 2 levers that can just do the ratio in 1 go?

The design of the levers will not be that much different from team to team. There will be some teams who will figure out how to determine the ratios in "1 go", but this is extremely difficult. Although the devices might be the similar, how the teams use the device will vary.
chalker
Member
Member
Posts: 2107
Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by chalker »

chinesesushi wrote: Rule 3a: The device must be a class 1 lever connected directly in series to a class 2 lever, each with a single beam of length less than or equal to 40.0 cm. So you can't just "abandon" the second class lever, or else they would have just called the event Simple Machines and have it be the same as the Div. B event.
Also note 5.d. that talks about making an honest attempt to utilize a compound lever....

Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
slytherin
Member
Member
Posts: 70
Joined: October 1st, 2012, 5:56 pm
Division: B
State: KS
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by slytherin »

So, i made a normal lever with the fulcrum in the middle, and now me and my dad can't really figure out how to find the ratio of two weights, help?
State:
Anatomy: 2nd
Meteorology: 2nd
Simple Machines: 2nd
Solar System: 2nd
Notice a pattern :lol:
Locked

Return to “2015 Lab Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest