Re: Rotor Egg Drop B
Posted: November 10th, 2012, 8:27 am
i was reading the rule guidelines and it said that blade or wings have to spin on a central axis... how do u get it to do that? 
Ouch, that color hurt.desmond the moonbear wrote:i was reading the rule guidelines and it said that blade or wings have to spin on a central axis... how do u get it to do that?
Sorry if I'm poking at a sore, or this is your view and I'm preaching to the choir, but... Why doesn't the hollow tube have a bottom? What else would you call the lowest part of the device, ie the lower rim? Straight from an on-line dictionary bot·tom/ˈbätəm/ Noun: The lowest point or partJimY wrote:<SNIP>"mounted or suspended from the bottom of the device such that". This clearly does not allow hollow tube designs for holding the egg, since they have no bottoms. <SNIP>
Our Coaches were told at the Ohio Coaches Clinic that blades with curved bottoms would be considered a construction violation. They said that even though the blades are turning, they are a combo parachute/blade. We disagree, we have used these blade shapes for years in Wright Stuff, Balloon Launched Gliders, and Helicopters. I never heard an issue of wing/blade shape in those events where shape helps efficiency.jander14indoor wrote:That's the second time I've heard that, but I still don't understand it. Nothing in the rules about a curved bottom.e_sully wrote:Be very careful with laminated rotors that they are not arched, or at least have a solid bottom. A curved rotor will act like a parachute and can get you DQ'd.
MANY airfoil shapes have curved bottoms but certainly don't act as a parachute. The key would seem to be rotary movement, NOT shape. A flat plat that doesn't rotate acts the same as a parachute.
Where is this statement coming from?
Jeff Anderson
Livonia, MI
If you have any doubt, submit a clarification.John999 wrote:Our Coaches were told at the Ohio Coaches Clinic that blades with curved bottoms would be considered a construction violation. They said that even though the blades are turning, they are a combo parachute/blade. We disagree, we have used these blade shapes for years in Wright Stuff, Balloon Launched Gliders, and Helicopters. I never heard an issue of wing/blade shape in those events where shape helps efficiency.jander14indoor wrote:That's the second time I've heard that, but I still don't understand it. Nothing in the rules about a curved bottom.e_sully wrote:Be very careful with laminated rotors that they are not arched, or at least have a solid bottom. A curved rotor will act like a parachute and can get you DQ'd.
MANY airfoil shapes have curved bottoms but certainly don't act as a parachute. The key would seem to be rotary movement, NOT shape. A flat plat that doesn't rotate acts the same as a parachute.
Where is this statement coming from?
Jeff Anderson
Livonia, MI
We would love clarification on this topic.
As wisguy says above, submit a question on the official website. You won't get a clarification here.John999 wrote:
We would love clarification on this topic.
Don't take this wrong, but correct terminology is important to clear communications in science and engineering.cconry wrote:Sofan--did you say you used 2 or 4 rotors?
Is anyone using two layers of ~6 rotors each?