Can't Judge a Powder B
- haven chuck
- Exalted Member

- Posts: 343
- Joined: April 28th, 2007, 2:35 pm
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
We were having some confusion over the observation and inference concept, and deciding what the boundary between the two would be? Could anyone help clear this up?
i.e. Would seeing that the powder is soluble be enough to allow you to write that the powder is hydrophillic, and would that be an observation or inference?
i.e. Would seeing that the powder is soluble be enough to allow you to write that the powder is hydrophillic, and would that be an observation or inference?
2010 Can't Judge a Powder- NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
2010 Science Crimebusters- 3rd in the NATION
2010 Science Crimebusters- 3rd in the NATION
-
AlphaTauri
- Staff Emeritus

- Posts: 829
- Joined: September 11th, 2009, 1:41 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
I'm not really sure how to explain it other than an observation is anything that can be directly observed by, um, observing the substance, while an inference is based on an observation and prior knowledge.The clearest example I can find is from th rules:
Hope I helped.For instance, if a student observes that when 0.1g of the powder s put into 5ml of water, the powder floats on the water until it is stirred...would receive 5 points. If a student writes an inference instead of an observation, such as the density of the substance is less than water...would receive at most 3 points.
Hershey Science Olympiad 2009 - 2014
Volunteer for Michigan SO 2015 - 2018
]\/[ Go Blue!
Volunteer for Michigan SO 2015 - 2018
]\/[ Go Blue!
- SOninja
- Member

- Posts: 76
- Joined: April 13th, 2009, 4:17 pm
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
1) the powder is hydrophillic - definitely an inference 
2) 0.1 g of the powder dissolved in 5 mL of water - observation
3) this powder is soluble - dunno if it is observation or inference... i'm leaning towards observation though...
2) 0.1 g of the powder dissolved in 5 mL of water - observation
3) this powder is soluble - dunno if it is observation or inference... i'm leaning towards observation though...
2009 States: 
Crime busters
- 1st
*Reach for the Stars* - 1st
Anatomy - 7th
SO ♥ forever
"When it is dark enough, you can see the stars." -Charles Austin Beard
Crime busters
*Reach for the Stars* - 1st
Anatomy - 7th
SO ♥ forever
"When it is dark enough, you can see the stars." -Charles Austin Beard
- amerikestrel
- Exalted Member

- Posts: 606
- Joined: August 17th, 2009, 7:10 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
I think #3 would be an inference, not an observation.x_SOninja_x wrote:1) the powder is hydrophillic - definitely an inference
2) 0.1 g of the powder dissolved in 5 mL of water - observation
3) this powder is soluble - dunno if it is observation or inference... i'm leaning towards observation though...
Not competing in the 2011-12 season.
2011 B division PA State Ornithology and Fossils champ!
Medal count: 14
2011 B division PA State Ornithology and Fossils champ!
Medal count: 14
-
AlphaTauri
- Staff Emeritus

- Posts: 829
- Joined: September 11th, 2009, 1:41 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
I'm leaning towards inference. I think the observation would be "it dissolved" and from that, you could infer that it's soluble in water, since you need the observation "it dissolved" to draw the conclusion that it's soluble.
A close example would be when you have an object in a box, you shake the box, and hear the object rattling around inside.
Observation: When you shake the box, the object rattles around inside.
Inference: The object is solid. (It's an inference 'cause you can't directly observe that the object is solid.)
A close example would be when you have an object in a box, you shake the box, and hear the object rattling around inside.
Observation: When you shake the box, the object rattles around inside.
Inference: The object is solid. (It's an inference 'cause you can't directly observe that the object is solid.)
Hershey Science Olympiad 2009 - 2014
Volunteer for Michigan SO 2015 - 2018
]\/[ Go Blue!
Volunteer for Michigan SO 2015 - 2018
]\/[ Go Blue!
-
freakofnature17
- Member

- Posts: 34
- Joined: June 21st, 2009, 1:05 pm
- Division: B
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
This is right. Saying that the powder is soluble is an inference and will cost you to recieve at most like 2 or 3 (I'm not sure) points. But if you say the powder dissolved in water and one of the questions said, "Is the powder soluble in water?" you can say it is and use the observation you made to get the full 5 points.AlphaTauri wrote:I'm leaning towards inference. I think the observation would be "it dissolved" and from that, you could infer that it's soluble in water, since you need the observation "it dissolved" to draw the conclusion that it's soluble.
A close example would be when you have an object in a box, you shake the box, and hear the object rattling around inside.
Observation: When you shake the box, the object rattles around inside.
Inference: The object is solid. (It's an inference 'cause you can't directly observe that the object is solid.)
8th at Nationals......In our 1st year.........finally, our chance to shine
-
robotman
- Admin Emeritus

- Posts: 1447
- Joined: June 29th, 2008, 7:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 3 times
- Contact:
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
I think if you wrote "thesubstance turned the ph paper green" that would be your observation and than you could infer the ph off of that observation
-
freakofnature17
- Member

- Posts: 34
- Joined: June 21st, 2009, 1:05 pm
- Division: B
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
Or could say the pH of the powder is 1/2/3/4/etc. but not say whether it is a base or acid because that would be an inference. Then if one of the questions asked if the powder was a base or acid, you could use the pH to answer that and use that observation as your reason.robotman09 wrote:I think if you wrote "thesubstance turned the ph paper green" that would be your observation and than you could infer the ph off of that observation
So basically what I'm asking is are you only allowed to say the color of the pH paper in the observations or can you say the actual pH without losing points?
8th at Nationals......In our 1st year.........finally, our chance to shine
- EastStroudsburg13
- Admin Emeritus

- Posts: 3201
- Joined: January 17th, 2009, 7:32 am
- Division: Grad
- State: MD
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 204 times
- Contact:
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
I think you should put the pH number in inferences because the paper turns a certain color and you have to compare it with the key to figure out what its pH is. Then the base vs. acid topic would be a further inference that you can put down.
East Stroudsburg South Class of 2012, Alumnus of JT Lambert, Drexel University Class of 2017
Helpful Links
Wiki
Wiki Pages that Need Work
FAQ and SciOly FAQ Wiki
Chat (See IRC Wiki for more info)
BBCode Wiki
So long, and thanks for all the Future Dictator titles!
Helpful Links
Wiki
Wiki Pages that Need Work
FAQ and SciOly FAQ Wiki
Chat (See IRC Wiki for more info)
BBCode Wiki
So long, and thanks for all the Future Dictator titles!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests