Page 3 of 10
Re: 2009 National Science Olympiad Competition Results
Posted: May 17th, 2009, 10:26 am
by dontsenditinthemail
Congrats to everybody at the national competition!
Special congrats to teams from OHIO for carrying on the legacy that is Ohio Science Olympiad
Uber Special Congrats to SOLON MIDDLE SCHOOL for being BACK TO BACK NATIONALS CHAMPIONS and blowing out the competition this year!!!
Re: 2009 National Science Olympiad Competition Results
Posted: May 17th, 2009, 11:33 am
by eak227
FULL RESULTS ARE NOW POSTED.
Division B full results.
Division C full results.
I'm going to repost this from the first page. I updated the top 10 list with scores...
Division B
10th: Lakeshore - Michigan - 384
9th:Eagle Hill - New York - 382
8th: Thomas Jefferson - Indiana - 380
7th: White Pines - Michigan - 378
6th: Muscatel - California - 373
5th: JC Booth - Georgia - 370
4th: Arden - California - 369
3rd: Community - New Jersey - 349
2nd: ExCEL Homeschoolers - Washington - 347
1st: Solon - Ohio - 242
Division C
10: Mira Loma - CA - 416
9: New Trier - IL - 360
8: Liberal Arts and Science Academy - TX - 353
7: Mentor - OH - 352
6: Penncrest - PA - 335
5: Fayetteville Manlius - NY - 330
4: Harriton - PA - 247
3: Troy - CA - 228
2: Grand Haven - MI - 205
1: Centerville - OH - 170
A few comments. First, I've never seen a top 10 list so tight as the Division B one. Solon basically ran away with it, but for the 2-10 to be separated by 37 points? Wow.
Second. Division C. WOW. The top FOUR teams under 250 points? The winner at 170? That just seems really low to me. Centerville only had 1 event out of the top 20 and 7 out of the top 10. Impressive.
Here are the list of winning and 4th place scores from the past 5 years:
2008: 216, 314
2007: 201, 287
2006: 172, 303
2005: 217, 367
2004: 263, 331
2003: 268, 291
Re: 2009 National Science Olympiad Competition Results
Posted: May 17th, 2009, 11:57 am
by croman74
Complete blowout by Solon. But the rest of the top 10 was completely open to others. It was a true fight for 2-10. Division C is impressive as well. Getting 170 at nats is incredible. Congrats to both Ohio teams for dominating.
Re: 2009 National Science Olympiad Competition Results
Posted: May 17th, 2009, 12:10 pm
by fmtiger124
2 things outside of Solon B top 10 was really close and Gelinas got 11th
Re: 2009 National Science Olympiad Competition Results
Posted: May 17th, 2009, 12:43 pm
by smartkid222
is it so hard to order the teams by rank instead of team number?

I have
last year's scoresheetsand they were done like that
If they are gonna wait till the next day to post the results they might as well spend a few extra seconds pressing the button that orders the resutls by rank.
To accomodate everyone they usually have 2 scoresheets per division: one organized by rank and one by team # so i hope they still do that.
Re: 2009 National Science Olympiad Competition Results
Posted: May 17th, 2009, 12:44 pm
by fmtiger124
smartkid222 wrote:omg they are out of their minds, is it so hard to order the teams by rank instead of team number?

i know i hate that
Re: 2009 National Science Olympiad Competition Results
Posted: May 17th, 2009, 12:51 pm
by smartkid222
eak227 wrote:
Here are the list of winning and 4th place scores from the past 5 years:
2008: 216, 314
2007: 201, 287
2006: 172, 303
2005: 217, 367
2004: 263, 331
2003: 268, 291
The full results from past competitions
Re: 2009 National Science Olympiad Competition Results
Posted: May 17th, 2009, 1:05 pm
by dickyjones
HUGE congrats to Bloomington South for getting 14th after finding out about getting to go only 3 weeks before!
And that 10/11 tie has to be brutal.
Re: 2009 National Science Olympiad Competition Results
Posted: May 17th, 2009, 1:07 pm
by Dark Sabre
fmtiger124 wrote:smartkid222 wrote:omg they are out of their minds, is it so hard to order the teams by rank instead of team number?

i know i hate that
Makes it a lot easier to enter the results into the prediction contest...see, it is all about me

Re: 2009 National Science Olympiad Competition Results
Posted: May 17th, 2009, 1:49 pm
by gh
Dark Sabre wrote:fmtiger124 wrote:smartkid222 wrote:omg they are out of their minds, is it so hard to order the teams by rank instead of team number? :evil: :evil:
i know i hate that
Makes it a lot easier to enter the results into the prediction contest...see, it is all about me ;)
See, if they cared about you (us?), they would have just posted the Excel sheet instead of the PDFs. :P