Scioly.org

ScottMaurer19 wrote:

dmis wrote:

ScottMaurer19 wrote: How would one even break 1700.... (cries internally at the thought)

Keep in mind that the difference in target time makes it considerably easier to score over 1700 at nationals than it is at regionals.

Ohhhhh good point. You just lowered my stress levels significantly

Lol. I was wondering how anyone could possibly get those numbers but realized the issue when I did the calculations and found that negative dimensions would be required to get over 1700 at regionals.

dmis wrote:

ScottMaurer19 wrote:

dmis wrote:
Keep in mind that the difference in target time makes it considerably easier to score over 1700 at nationals than it is at regionals.

Ohhhhh good point. You just lowered my stress levels significantly

Lol. I was wondering how anyone could possibly get those numbers but realized the issue when I did the calculations and found that negative dimensions would be required to get over 1700 at regionals.

Yeah my calculations for a top-tier regional device that I would hypothetically want to have if I were competing ended up at 1450.

I overheard Troy A's size measurements while at impound at MIT. They were along the lines of 25*15*40cm (Troy went for a single wall in the middle design). That gives them about 100 size points, which will be very hard to beat.

TheSquaad wrote:I overheard Troy A's size measurements while at impound at MIT. They were along the lines of 25*15*40cm (Troy went for a single wall in the middle design). That gives them about 100 size points, which will be very hard to beat.

Dang their build is fairly high (40cm). I would expect smaller from them. Mine personally is 25 x 18 x 20

Kyanite wrote:

TheSquaad wrote:I overheard Troy A's size measurements while at impound at MIT. They were along the lines of 25*15*40cm (Troy went for a single wall in the middle design). That gives them about 100 size points, which will be very hard to beat.

Dang their build is fairly high (40cm). I would expect smaller from them. Mine personally is 25 x 18 x 20

But does it have all the transfers?

ScottMaurer19 wrote:

Kyanite wrote:

TheSquaad wrote:I overheard Troy A's size measurements while at impound at MIT. They were along the lines of 25*15*40cm (Troy went for a single wall in the middle design). That gives them about 100 size points, which will be very hard to beat.

Dang their build is fairly high (40cm). I would expect smaller from them. Mine personally is 25 x 18 x 20

But does it have all the transfers?

Not yet still gotta finish 2 transfers, which we have space for we just have to make sure nothing catches fire

Kyanite wrote:

ScottMaurer19 wrote:

Kyanite wrote:
Dang their build is fairly high (40cm). I would expect smaller from them. Mine personally is 25 x 18 x 20

But does it have all the transfers?

Not yet still gotta finish 2 transfers, which we have space for we just have to make sure nothing catches fire

Haha nice. Impressive dimensions

I think a score of around 1200 won CLC in Illinois yesterday.

ScottMaurer19 wrote:

Kyanite wrote:

ScottMaurer19 wrote: But does it have all the transfers?

Not yet still gotta finish 2 transfers, which we have space for we just have to make sure nothing catches fire

Haha nice. Impressive dimensions

That's crazy small.

Do people think size will be the differentiating factor between the top teams at Nationals?

Iwilsonp wrote:

ScottMaurer19 wrote:

Kyanite wrote:
Not yet still gotta finish 2 transfers, which we have space for we just have to make sure nothing catches fire

Haha nice. Impressive dimensions

That's crazy small.

Do people think size will be the differentiating factor between the top teams at Nationals?

I feel like both the chemical clock and the size will be the determining factor at nats.