Scioly.org

doctor wrote:in hte test i did tey had alot on it
and the koppen classification
argh i hate that so much to learn on that

What kind of questions were they?

pjgscioisamazing wrote:

doctor wrote:in hte test i did tey had alot on it
and the koppen classification
argh i hate that so much to learn on that

What kind of questions were they?

Do you mean they had a lot of questions on the koppen climate classification or on weather vs. climate, or both??

pjgscioisamazing wrote:

SSANationalTeam1 wrote:Elevation -for each 1000 foot rise there is a 4 degree F. drop in temperature

What would taht be in degrees Celsius?

that would be 2.22

chill wrote:

pjgscioisamazing wrote:

doctor wrote:in hte test i did tey had alot on it
and the koppen classification
argh i hate that so much to learn on that

What kind of questions were they?

Do you mean they had a lot of questions on the koppen climate classification or on weather vs. climate, or both??

neither
I went to like 4 tests that had neither on it

chill wrote:

pjgscioisamazing wrote:

doctor wrote:in hte test i did tey had alot on it
and the koppen classification
argh i hate that so much to learn on that

What kind of questions were they?

Do you mean they had a lot of questions on the koppen climate classification or on weather vs. climate, or both??

On the test I took for SE Pa, they had a fairly large section for weather vs. climate. I think they had a small section on the KCC.

so basically you mean it just depends on the competition your going to if they have KCC or weather vs. climate or both.
Thanks anyway

most state test depend on the professor writing it and what they like so be prepared for anything in th rules

I would think that there would be more about Koppen, because that is a major area in climate, than weather vs. climate, which is just a small one. It seems to me that tests either have a lot of Koppen or barely any, if at all.

my guess would be that there would be a little of everything on it
but not much
I wouldn't put that much on it

I think it ALL depends on the writer of the event. I think a good event would include all the stuff in the rules, not ask random facts, and ask for more interpretation of general ideas in the rules, and interpretations of diagrams, graphs, images ,etc.