Can't Judge a Powder B

Locked
User avatar
haven chuck
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 343
Joined: April 28th, 2007, 2:35 pm
Division: C
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Can't Judge a Powder B

Post by haven chuck »

robotman09 wrote:How many observations have people been getting?
We had 39 on the state test (described a few posts back), and 49 (i think) on the regionals test, which had H2O, HCl, NaOH, and CaCO4.
2010 Can't Judge a Powder- NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
2010 Science Crimebusters- 3rd in the NATION
User avatar
ichaelm
Member
Member
Posts: 440
Joined: October 23rd, 2008, 3:10 pm
Division: Grad
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Can't Judge a Powder B

Post by ichaelm »

Thanks, haven chuck!!! Now I finally associate you with your username! XD
User avatar
2win
Member
Member
Posts: 553
Joined: March 3rd, 2009, 6:07 pm
Division: C
State: TX
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Can't Judge a Powder B

Post by 2win »

robotman09 wrote:How many observations have people been getting?
33 at state, and we were gonna write down about 10 more. xD
k-tx. retiring from scioly.
DanielleS
Member
Member
Posts: 31
Joined: February 21st, 2010, 11:27 am
Division: B
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Can't Judge a Powder B

Post by DanielleS »

Despite epic failing, we had about 35 observations down.
suppiechan369
Member
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: May 2nd, 2010, 10:59 pm
Division: C
State: WI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Can't Judge a Powder B

Post by suppiechan369 »

i heard that the judges are really strict about the differences between "observations" and "inferences". so would it be ok to say that a powder conducts if it gives a reading on the multimeter? or is that an inference?
User avatar
haven chuck
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 343
Joined: April 28th, 2007, 2:35 pm
Division: C
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Can't Judge a Powder B

Post by haven chuck »

Even if that would be an observation (depends on the judge), you would probably get only 3 or 4 points for the cooresponding answer you would write. Rather, you should write something like "When the conductivity tested is placed in a solution of the powder and [liquid], the light on the conductivity tester blinks very fast." That is for the most basic conuctivity tester, and will almost definitely be 5 points. For one that gives a reading, you could say "The solution of the powder and [liquid] registers a [#] for conductivity."
2010 Can't Judge a Powder- NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
2010 Science Crimebusters- 3rd in the NATION
User avatar
karatekid44
Member
Member
Posts: 119
Joined: February 10th, 2009, 5:16 pm
Division: B
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Can't Judge a Powder B

Post by karatekid44 »

In the rules it states that you could have a device for holding toe powder, wouldn't a graduated cylinder be considered a device for holding the powder? I fought with the judge at states with this.
My Brother USCGA-2012
I'm On A Boat
The Bloodhound Gang
Don't put the stick there! Thats what she said!
Ah Science Olympiad give perfect opportunities for thats what she said jokes.
User avatar
haven chuck
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 343
Joined: April 28th, 2007, 2:35 pm
Division: C
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Can't Judge a Powder B

Post by haven chuck »

The problem with a graduated cynlinder is that it measures volume, and then you could have more detailed observations than other teams. In the future, test tubes are probably much better and less controversial.
2010 Can't Judge a Powder- NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
2010 Science Crimebusters- 3rd in the NATION
sciolyandmathcounts
Member
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: March 11th, 2010, 2:13 pm
Division: B
State: IN
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Can't Judge a Powder B

Post by sciolyandmathcounts »

I'm getting problems with density. I double check my observations but it always says the density is less than 1 yet it sinks in water...........help?????????
WWMS 2010-2011!
Events:
Microbe Mission
Shock Value
Experimental Design
???????????
rocketman1555
Staff Emeritus
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 577
Joined: September 10th, 2006, 8:21 am
Division: Grad
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Can't Judge a Powder B

Post by rocketman1555 »

sciolyandmathcounts wrote:I'm getting problems with density. I double check my observations but it always says the density is less than 1 yet it sinks in water...........help?????????
If it sinks in water than the density is greater than one. You should be basing it off of what you observe, not what you calculate. Especially because it would be hard to get an accurate density unless you use a large amount of powder and have something in which you can easily measure a small displacement of the water level. However, you or your partner may be writing the observation down incorrectly.
I am a practitioner of the art of magic known as science.
Locked

Return to “2010 Lab Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests