We had 39 on the state test (described a few posts back), and 49 (i think) on the regionals test, which had H2O, HCl, NaOH, and CaCO4.robotman09 wrote:How many observations have people been getting?
Can't Judge a Powder B
- haven chuck
- Exalted Member

- Posts: 343
- Joined: April 28th, 2007, 2:35 pm
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
2010 Can't Judge a Powder- NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
2010 Science Crimebusters- 3rd in the NATION
2010 Science Crimebusters- 3rd in the NATION
- ichaelm
- Member

- Posts: 440
- Joined: October 23rd, 2008, 3:10 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
Thanks, haven chuck!!! Now I finally associate you with your username! XD
- 2win
- Member

- Posts: 553
- Joined: March 3rd, 2009, 6:07 pm
- Division: C
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
33 at state, and we were gonna write down about 10 more. xDrobotman09 wrote:How many observations have people been getting?
k-tx. retiring from scioly.
-
suppiechan369
- Member

- Posts: 2
- Joined: May 2nd, 2010, 10:59 pm
- Division: C
- State: WI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
i heard that the judges are really strict about the differences between "observations" and "inferences". so would it be ok to say that a powder conducts if it gives a reading on the multimeter? or is that an inference?
- haven chuck
- Exalted Member

- Posts: 343
- Joined: April 28th, 2007, 2:35 pm
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
Even if that would be an observation (depends on the judge), you would probably get only 3 or 4 points for the cooresponding answer you would write. Rather, you should write something like "When the conductivity tested is placed in a solution of the powder and [liquid], the light on the conductivity tester blinks very fast." That is for the most basic conuctivity tester, and will almost definitely be 5 points. For one that gives a reading, you could say "The solution of the powder and [liquid] registers a [#] for conductivity."
2010 Can't Judge a Powder- NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
2010 Science Crimebusters- 3rd in the NATION
2010 Science Crimebusters- 3rd in the NATION
- karatekid44
- Member

- Posts: 119
- Joined: February 10th, 2009, 5:16 pm
- Division: B
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
In the rules it states that you could have a device for holding toe powder, wouldn't a graduated cylinder be considered a device for holding the powder? I fought with the judge at states with this.
My Brother USCGA-2012
I'm On A Boat
The Bloodhound Gang
Don't put the stick there! Thats what she said!
Ah Science Olympiad give perfect opportunities for thats what she said jokes.
I'm On A Boat
The Bloodhound Gang
Don't put the stick there! Thats what she said!
Ah Science Olympiad give perfect opportunities for thats what she said jokes.
- haven chuck
- Exalted Member

- Posts: 343
- Joined: April 28th, 2007, 2:35 pm
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
The problem with a graduated cynlinder is that it measures volume, and then you could have more detailed observations than other teams. In the future, test tubes are probably much better and less controversial.
2010 Can't Judge a Powder- NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
2010 Science Crimebusters- 3rd in the NATION
2010 Science Crimebusters- 3rd in the NATION
-
sciolyandmathcounts
- Member

- Posts: 64
- Joined: March 11th, 2010, 2:13 pm
- Division: B
- State: IN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
I'm getting problems with density. I double check my observations but it always says the density is less than 1 yet it sinks in water...........help?????????
WWMS 2010-2011!
Events:
Microbe Mission
Shock Value
Experimental Design
???????????
Events:
Microbe Mission
Shock Value
Experimental Design
???????????
-
rocketman1555
- Staff Emeritus

- Posts: 577
- Joined: September 10th, 2006, 8:21 am
- Division: Grad
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Can't Judge a Powder B
If it sinks in water than the density is greater than one. You should be basing it off of what you observe, not what you calculate. Especially because it would be hard to get an accurate density unless you use a large amount of powder and have something in which you can easily measure a small displacement of the water level. However, you or your partner may be writing the observation down incorrectly.sciolyandmathcounts wrote:I'm getting problems with density. I double check my observations but it always says the density is less than 1 yet it sinks in water...........help?????????
I am a practitioner of the art of magic known as science.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
