Wind Power C

User avatar
ichaelm
Member
Member
Posts: 440
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 3:10 pm
Division: Grad
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Wind Power C

Post by ichaelm »

You're not in the International Space Station, are you? :shock:
User avatar
49ers
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 371
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:22 am
Division: Grad
State: PA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Wind Power C

Post by 49ers »

no im in Internal School suspension. ISS. you basically can't do anything.
East Stroudsburg South and J.T.L Cavs Alumnus
49ersfan
Metsfan
You are now free to lose the game.
ESU Warrior '21
Need a rugger? Look no further.
Disk is lif.
Physics; Earth and Space Science major; Math minor.
Get me out of this place *gestures wildly at USA*
User avatar
2win
Member
Member
Posts: 553
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:07 pm
Division: C
State: TX
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Wind Power C

Post by 2win »

49ers wrote:no im in Internal School suspension. ISS. you basically can't do anything.
all for having ur phone out in the AMC... harsh...
http://www.scioly.org/phpBB3/viewtopic. ... 3&start=15

scroll down, try that, but if it's still not loading.... >.<
basically, your blade assembly (on a cd) is connected to the generator and there is a parallel-ly connected resistor also. then the volmeter is connected at the end, and they measure how much electricity you've generated (at the low and high speed of the fan)
k-tx. retiring from scioly.
User avatar
kv1296
Member
Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:28 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Wind Power C

Post by kv1296 »

Alright so I just want to make sure we're getting our scoring right. Based on what I could understand, with a low power of .29 volts and a high of .39, our total raw score for part 1 would be 47.24 wouldn't it?
Science Olympiad is a secret government consipracy to make the nations youth actually like science.
User avatar
2win
Member
Member
Posts: 553
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:07 pm
Division: C
State: TX
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Wind Power C

Post by 2win »

kv1296 wrote:Alright so I just want to make sure we're getting our scoring right. Based on what I could understand, with a low power of .29 volts and a high of .39, our total raw score for part 1 would be 47.24 wouldn't it?
Power= (Mean Voltage or whichever speed)^2 / load resistance

Raw score for part 1 = Power for low speed + Power for high speed
k-tx. retiring from scioly.
User avatar
kv1296
Member
Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:28 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Wind Power C

Post by kv1296 »

OMG 2win, one of my friends moved from here to Texas and goes to your school, you probably don't know her though.
Science Olympiad is a secret government consipracy to make the nations youth actually like science.
User avatar
ichaelm
Member
Member
Posts: 440
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 3:10 pm
Division: Grad
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Wind Power C

Post by ichaelm »

kv1296 wrote:Alright so I just want to make sure we're getting our scoring right. Based on what I could understand, with a low power of .29 volts and a high of .39, our total raw score for part 1 would be 47.24 wouldn't it?
Your low and high powers are not measured in volts. They are in watts. If somehow you got volts then you did the calculation wrong. You're using a resistor right?
However, if you were actually talking about your low and high speed voltages, and you used a resistance of 5 ohms, then yes, that would be your raw score for part 1. In watts.
eeldj123
Member
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:34 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Wind Power C

Post by eeldj123 »

ichaelm wrote:
kv1296 wrote:Alright so I just want to make sure we're getting our scoring right. Based on what I could understand, with a low power of .29 volts and a high of .39, our total raw score for part 1 would be 47.24 wouldn't it?
Your low and high powers are not measured in volts. They are in watts. If somehow you got volts then you did the calculation wrong. You're using a resistor right?
However, if you were actually talking about your low and high speed voltages, and you used a resistance of 5 ohms, then yes, that would be your raw score for part 1. In watts.
Or maybe kv1296 is just reading straight off the voltmeter.
eeldj123
Member
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:34 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Wind Power C

Post by eeldj123 »

I apologize for the double post, but I wanted to clarify some more things for the turbine...

What does the 6 cm minimum mean? And is it okay if my blade looks like this?

|
|
|
O[4.0 cm distance between very front of the blades and back of the motor]
|
|
|

And the blades form a 21 cm diameter. The rules said something about how the blades can't extend more than 2 cm behind the mounting plane for a radial distance of 3 cm, which is somewhat worded in a confusing manner. So assuming my blades are as straight as a ruler, would it meet the 2cm/3cm rule? Since it seems that it is just there to make sure that the blade doesn't attack the mounting plane.
Flavorflav
Member
Member
Posts: 1388
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:06 am
Division: Grad
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Wind Power C

Post by Flavorflav »

eeldj123 wrote:I apologize for the double post, but I wanted to clarify some more things for the turbine...

What does the 6 cm minimum mean? And is it okay if my blade looks like this?

|
|
|
O[4.0 cm distance between very front of the blades and back of the motor]
|
|
|

And the blades form a 21 cm diameter. The rules said something about how the blades can't extend more than 2 cm behind the mounting plane for a radial distance of 3 cm, which is somewhat worded in a confusing manner. So assuming my blades are as straight as a ruler, would it meet the 2cm/3cm rule? Since it seems that it is just there to make sure that the blade doesn't attack the mounting plane.
To paraphrase:

1. Within 3 cm of the axis of rotation (i.e., the axle of the motor), you cannot go behind the CD at all;
2. Over 3 cm from the axis of rotation, you can go up to 2 cm behind the plane of the CD;
3. No part of the blade assembly can extend more than 14 cm from the axis of rotation.

That's it. The 4 cm distance you gave is not meaningful, since the rules don't care about the front of the propeller. If your blades are really as straight as a ruler, though, then the entire thing is in front of the plane of the CD and the only part of the rule that matters to you is the 14 cm maximum radius, which you seem to be within.

Return to “2011 Lab Events”