Page 19 of 38

Re: Boomilever B/C

Posted: December 17th, 2018, 5:45 pm
by PM2017
As everyone seems to need to say in balsa building forums, please read through all the forum posts for this year's boomilever thread, and the previous two years for towers...

Re: Boomilever B/C

Posted: December 18th, 2018, 11:42 am
by Cow481
i tested my newest boomilever and it got 1720 :D ! it was 7.5 grams and held 12.9 kilograms. i feel nats will be at least 2200 to place in top 6

Re: Boomilever B/C

Posted: December 18th, 2018, 12:12 pm
by MadCow2357
Cow481 wrote:i tested my newest boomilever and it got 1720 :D ! it was 7.5 grams and held 12.9 kilograms. i feel nats will be at least 2200 to place in top 6
*I clap and hang my head in shame*

Re: Boomilever B/C

Posted: December 18th, 2018, 3:42 pm
by waffletree
Cow481 wrote:i tested my newest boomilever and it got 1720 :D ! it was 7.5 grams and held 12.9 kilograms. i feel nats will be at least 2200 to place in top 6
yayy good job!
EDIT: wait no not good job...we're competing against each other

Re: Boomilever B/C

Posted: December 18th, 2018, 4:17 pm
by klastyioer
waffletree wrote:
Cow481 wrote:i tested my newest boomilever and it got 1720 :D ! it was 7.5 grams and held 12.9 kilograms. i feel nats will be at least 2200 to place in top 6
yayy good job!
EDIT: wait no not good job...we're competing against each other
that moment when you realize your life sucks sometimes

Re: Boomilever B/C

Posted: December 18th, 2018, 5:51 pm
by MadCow2357
klastyioer wrote:
waffletree wrote:
Cow481 wrote:i tested my newest boomilever and it got 1720 :D ! it was 7.5 grams and held 12.9 kilograms. i feel nats will be at least 2200 to place in top 6
yayy good job!
EDIT: wait no not good job...we're competing against each other
that moment when you realize your life sucks sometimes
Facts lol.

Sorry this is spam...

Re: Boomilever B/C

Posted: December 19th, 2018, 5:40 am
by klastyioer
MadCow2357 wrote:
klastyioer wrote:
waffletree wrote: yayy good job!
EDIT: wait no not good job...we're competing against each other
that moment when you realize your life sucks sometimes
Facts lol.

Sorry this is spam...
i dont think so
but big facts lolll

Re: Boomilever B/C

Posted: December 19th, 2018, 6:06 am
by Carrot
How does one add vertical bracings that connect from the tension pieces to the compression if the tension piece is not parallel to the compression piece, as in the 2 tension pieces come together to one point?

Re: Boomilever B/C

Posted: December 19th, 2018, 7:08 am
by MadCow2357
Carrot wrote:How does one add vertical bracings that connect from the tension pieces to the compression if the tension piece is not parallel to the compression piece, as in the 2 tension pieces come together to one point?
Not entirely sure what you mean, but I'm assuming that you're talking about connecting the tension members to the compression if the tension members taper inward to the point? In this case, a normal connection wouldn't work, normal as in everything is perpendicular and generally in the same plane. Haven't tried this before, but you could try shaving off a length of corner on a main compression beam, and rotate the main tension members so you could make a secure connection. You would then be able to make a "normal connection", except that member would be slightly vertically tilted. Does that make sense?

Re: Boomilever B/C

Posted: December 19th, 2018, 7:26 am
by Carrot
MadCow2357 wrote:
Carrot wrote:How does one add vertical bracings that connect from the tension pieces to the compression if the tension piece is not parallel to the compression piece, as in the 2 tension pieces come together to one point?
Not entirely sure what you mean, but I'm assuming that you're talking about connecting the tension members to the compression if the tension members taper inward to the point? In this case, a normal connection wouldn't work, normal as in everything is perpendicular and generally in the same plane. Haven't tried this before, but you could try shaving off a length of corner on a main compression beam, and rotate the main tension members so you could make a secure connection. You would then be able to make a "normal connection", except that member would be slightly vertically tilted. Does that make sense?
I'm not sure if shaving off part of the compression beam would be the best. Do you think it would be possible for me to just use very thin bracings and just bend them to fit? This would probably not offer lots of compression strength in the vertical bracings though, but I mainly just need the them to hold the compression in place and hopefully not bend as much.