2011 Events.

For anything Science Olympiad-related that might not fall under a specific event or competition.
cypressfalls Robert
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 499
Joined: January 6th, 2009, 7:54 pm
Division: Grad
State: TX
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: 2011 Events.

Post by cypressfalls Robert »

andrewwski wrote:Multiple rings would be nice, but may not be feasible. Current rules (at least in NY) require each bot to have three selectable channels. If you get multiple rings with multiple bots using the same frequency, that's trouble.
has something like that ever happened at nationals or something
User avatar
Jocool
Member
Member
Posts: 269
Joined: December 23rd, 2008, 8:17 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: 2011 Events.

Post by Jocool »

Its only been a trial
Go to Jocool's Userpage for my results.

Halo Series Fan
Male.
Assassinator #22.
C.P. Weber Scioly Team Rule #42: BLAME TEAM 3
User avatar
packer-backer91
Member
Member
Posts: 199
Joined: December 20th, 2007, 6:51 pm
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: 2011 Events.

Post by packer-backer91 »

I made some plans for a tower but realized that I had know idea of what would be a good score for Towers [I know what is good in boom/bridges but the only national score sheet I found at my score had weird scores on them winning score was in 9000’s I knew that year must have had different score system], my guess is anything over 2000 is great [seen some booms/bridges that place high at Nat’s with that score] is my assumption correct? Also anyone think they will switch to beam building next year to replace the bridge?
Image
Favorite Events: Experimental Design, Scrambler, Mousetrap Vehicle
Thanks Science Olympiad for the 6 Great Years!
Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened. ― Dr. Seuss
User avatar
eta150
Member
Member
Posts: 269
Joined: March 11th, 2009, 3:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: 2011 Events.

Post by eta150 »

Actually, towers have the potential to have much higher efficiency than bridges, the current event.
#ACESWILD
User avatar
smartkid222
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 774
Joined: June 22nd, 2008, 8:12 am
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: 2011 Events.

Post by smartkid222 »

packer-backer91 wrote:I made some plans for a tower but realized that I had know idea of what would be a good score for Towers [I know what is good in boom/bridges but the only national score sheet I found at my score had weird scores on them winning score was in 9000’s I knew that year must have had different score system], my guess is anything over 2000 is great [seen some booms/bridges that place high at Nat’s with that score] is my assumption correct? Also anyone think they will switch to beam building next year to replace the bridge?
It depends on the dimentions. On the easy 2007 rules the NY#1 was over 3500, which is absolutly crazy; 2000 would be considered an excellent score (top 5 at states i guess) . On the harder 2008 rules, the NY #1 was about 2500 and anything over 1500 would be considered an excellent score (top 5 at states).
Image 2008 NY BLG Champ
2010 NY Helicopter Champ
User avatar
Jocool
Member
Member
Posts: 269
Joined: December 23rd, 2008, 8:17 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: 2011 Events.

Post by Jocool »

does anyone no wat trials r goona become national events? cuz the supervisor for car of tomorrow at states said that they are voting on it to be a national event next year. any other ones?
Go to Jocool's Userpage for my results.

Halo Series Fan
Male.
Assassinator #22.
C.P. Weber Scioly Team Rule #42: BLAME TEAM 3
new horizon
Member
Member
Posts: 175
Joined: March 7th, 2010, 6:46 am
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: 2011 Events.

Post by new horizon »

interesting. Is car of tomorrow a strictly B event? Do you think they will make an exception to C? because that sounds super awesome/cool. maglev car? woah.
User avatar
Jocool
Member
Member
Posts: 269
Joined: December 23rd, 2008, 8:17 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: 2011 Events.

Post by Jocool »

it is b. unfortunately, don't think it will become a c.
Go to Jocool's Userpage for my results.

Halo Series Fan
Male.
Assassinator #22.
C.P. Weber Scioly Team Rule #42: BLAME TEAM 3
new horizon
Member
Member
Posts: 175
Joined: March 7th, 2010, 6:46 am
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: 2011 Events.

Post by new horizon »

aw..... that would've been awesome. xD

oh well, at least C div has some really cool events. :D
wlsguy
Member
Member
Posts: 366
Joined: March 23rd, 2009, 9:08 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: 2011 Events.

Post by wlsguy »

With respect to Car of Tomorrow, Sumobots, and other new tech events.

One of the considerations is always the amount of money required to get the supplies so the school can compete. While I'm sure that many schools build their Sumobots from scratch (at minimal cost) others do not have the experience and end up with a kit. The kits can get expensive. Car of Tomorrow is the same, buying a maglev track so you can practice.

I'm hoping that the Natl people continue to pay careful attention to the cost of the "new" events so they keep SO within reach of the schools that may be financially burdened.

Other than that, I'm more of a traditionalist when it comes to event styles. I would rather see the build events be task based and not head to head (sorry Sumobots). I would be more interested in seeing a robot ramble style event that uses a remote camera for guidance (similar to the Mars Rovers or the military drone aircraft). Allow everyone except the participants to se their robot operate and make the teams run their robots via closed circut TV (or webcam, TV behind a screen, etc)

just my thoughts....
Post Reply

Return to “General Competition”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest