Page 18 of 28
Re: Ecology B/C
Posted: February 25th, 2010, 2:06 pm
by Aeri21
courage7856 wrote:Aeri21 wrote:Any specifics on what should be put on the note sheet?
I have general information on both biomes, and ecological principles and diagrams. What else?
Be familiar with how to calculate exponential growth. Include some historical events. Know CFCs. I hadn't thought about them, but my last invite test had a ton. Know stuff like global warming/greenhouse effect.
Thank you!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a21d8/a21d8884cc70c555fb91ae7a3cb390eb0c3d639b" alt="Smile :)"
Re: Ecology B/C
Posted: February 28th, 2010, 1:18 pm
by overdramatic
We just had our regionals and the ecology test was weirrrd. Isn't the focus supposed to be placed on biomes in North America? There was far too much on it about the Savannah.
Re: Ecology B/C
Posted: February 28th, 2010, 4:48 pm
by courage7856
overdramatic wrote:We just had our regionals and the ecology test was weirrrd. Isn't the focus supposed to be placed on biomes in North America? There was far too much on it about the Savannah.
I've also seen a lot about the Savannah. The rules say that we will "answer questions involving content knowledge and process skills in the area of ecology and adaptations in featured North American biomes."
It sounds like North American can apply to the area of ecology and adaptations, or just the adaptations, in which Savannah questions are completely acceptable. I guess it's up to the test writer's interpretation of the rules. I'll go submit that as a question at soinc though.
Re: Ecology B/C
Posted: March 4th, 2010, 4:50 pm
by ecologyfan
How different are the tests for B and C?
Re: Ecology B/C
Posted: March 7th, 2010, 4:33 pm
by Chantofox
On my cheat sheet I have rainfall, adaptions of animals, and organisms from every biome, because it seems that the two biomes that are focused upon are just as relevant as the other biomes in the tests I have taken. Would formulas be necessary?
Re: Ecology B/C
Posted: March 10th, 2010, 4:57 pm
by anatomydude
the definition for carrying capacity is: "the maximum number number of a certain species that can be sustained in its environment by the available resources" right?
Re: Ecology B/C
Posted: March 10th, 2010, 6:12 pm
by courage7856
anatomydude wrote:the definition for carrying capacity is: "the maximum number number of a certain species that can be sustained in its environment by the available resources" right?
That's the definition I have on my flash cards, and similar, just more complex, than the one on the wiki. Just double check the fact you said number twice. Most definitions you will need are on the Wiki. It is definitely a complete list.
Re: Ecology B/C
Posted: March 11th, 2010, 6:13 pm
by yyy4401
What should be on the notes
animals, rainfall, plants and what
this would be very helpful
my first year
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58b45/58b457054192de1032d880d2595a10efcae23be4" alt="Neutral :|"
Re: Ecology B/C
Posted: March 15th, 2010, 9:25 pm
by SO4L
Has anyone used the Shannon index on a test before?
Re: Ecology B/C
Posted: March 16th, 2010, 5:28 pm
by Paradox21
SO4L wrote:Has anyone used the Shannon index on a test before?
Hmm, that is interesting. I have never seen that before and certainly never encountered it on a test. It seems similar to ecological entropy, which I have heard of (but never had on a test). It seems that the Shannon index was originally designed for communication entropy but can be effectively treated as a way to calculate species diversity (which is different from species richness). As it turns out, it is one of several diversity indices, all of which utilize sigma notation, and some even have integrals. Many event proctors might find these too advanced to include on a typical Ecology test. Despite that, it is still interesting stuff that is worth learning even if you likely won’t be tested on it.