Thermodynamics B/C Build

olhs4n6
Member
Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2019 7:50 pm
Division: C
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Thermodynamics B/C Build

Post by olhs4n6 »

I'm looking into 3D printing my box (we just attended Solon and saw some of the top teams used 3D printed boxes). I was wondering if anyone had any advice on how to go about it and/or any precautions. Last year I remember someone advised me to not use a 3D printer, but I was wondering why. Thanks in advance!
CaTaStRoPhY
Member
Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2018 8:10 am
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Thermodynamics B/C Build

Post by CaTaStRoPhY »

On Saturday during the regionals, the supervisors poured 71C hot water into a graduated cylinder before pouring it into our beaker. We didn't account for this at all when we did our trials. I was surprised that our prediction was still good. I expected the initial temperature to drop dramatically because of the heat lost to the graduated cylinder and then also the beaker.
User avatar
CPScienceDude
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 367
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 2:40 pm
Division: C
State: IN
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 143 times
Been thanked: 89 times

Re: Thermodynamics B/C Build

Post by CPScienceDude »

CaTaStRoPhY wrote:On Saturday during the regionals, the supervisors poured 71C hot water into a graduated cylinder before pouring it into our beaker. We didn't account for this at all when we did our trials. I was surprised that our prediction was still good. I expected the initial temperature to drop dramatically because of the heat lost to the graduated cylinder and then also the beaker.
That is strange. I’ve been basing my predictions off after the water is poured, though. Maybe the cylinder was warm? Idk.
Captain of CPSO

Assassinator 139 and 147
2022 events: Chem Lab, Ornithology, Gravity Vehicle, Remote Sensing, Trajectory , and Forensics

About Me!
Image
CaTaStRoPhY
Member
Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2018 8:10 am
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Thermodynamics B/C Build

Post by CaTaStRoPhY »

CPScienceDude wrote:
CaTaStRoPhY wrote:On Saturday during the regionals, the supervisors poured 71C hot water into a graduated cylinder before pouring it into our beaker. We didn't account for this at all when we did our trials. I was surprised that our prediction was still good. I expected the initial temperature to drop dramatically because of the heat lost to the graduated cylinder and then also the beaker.
That is strange. I’ve been basing my predictions off after the water is poured, though. Maybe the cylinder was warm? Idk.
Yeah, my first temperature measurement was two minutes after pouring the water. And my partner said the same about the cylinder being warm too. But it just bothers me.
2018 events: Ecology, Microbe Mission, Thermodynamics, Herpetology
2019 events: Thermodynamics, Mousetrap Vehicle, Sounds of Music
User avatar
TheChiScientist
Member
Member
Posts: 732
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2018 11:25 am
Division: Grad
State: IL
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 44 times

Re: Thermodynamics B/C Build

Post by TheChiScientist »

CaTaStRoPhY wrote:
CPScienceDude wrote:
CaTaStRoPhY wrote:On Saturday during the regionals, the supervisors poured 71C hot water into a graduated cylinder before pouring it into our beaker. We didn't account for this at all when we did our trials. I was surprised that our prediction was still good. I expected the initial temperature to drop dramatically because of the heat lost to the graduated cylinder and then also the beaker.
That is strange. I’ve been basing my predictions off after the water is poured, though. Maybe the cylinder was warm? Idk.
Yeah, my first temperature measurement was two minutes after pouring the water. And my partner said the same about the cylinder being warm too. But it just bothers me.
You people are forgetting a major aspect here. :P Note that any box built reasonably well built will reach thermal equilibrium. At this point temperature loss is nearly irrelevant as it's so low. I've encountered this multiple times but you must account for it as it will make your values higher.
A Science Olympian from 2015 - 2019 CLCSO Alumni
Medal Count:30
IL PPP/Mission Assistant State Supervisor.
CLC Div. B Tournament Director.
President of The Builder Cult.
"A true Science Olympian embraces a life without Science Olympiad by becoming a part of Science Olympiad itself"- Me
User avatar
CPScienceDude
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 367
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 2:40 pm
Division: C
State: IN
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 143 times
Been thanked: 89 times

Re: Thermodynamics B/C Build

Post by CPScienceDude »

TheChiScientist wrote:
CaTaStRoPhY wrote:
CPScienceDude wrote: That is strange. I’ve been basing my predictions off after the water is poured, though. Maybe the cylinder was warm? Idk.
Yeah, my first temperature measurement was two minutes after pouring the water. And my partner said the same about the cylinder being warm too. But it just bothers me.
You people are forgetting a major aspect here. :P Note that any box built reasonably well built will reach thermal equilibrium. At this point temperature loss is nearly irrelevant as it's so low. I've encountered this multiple times but you must account for it as it will make your values higher.
Huh, my equation is never more than 1.5 degrees off
Captain of CPSO

Assassinator 139 and 147
2022 events: Chem Lab, Ornithology, Gravity Vehicle, Remote Sensing, Trajectory , and Forensics

About Me!
Image
CaTaStRoPhY
Member
Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2018 8:10 am
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Thermodynamics B/C Build

Post by CaTaStRoPhY »

TheChiScientist wrote:
CaTaStRoPhY wrote:
CPScienceDude wrote: That is strange. I’ve been basing my predictions off after the water is poured, though. Maybe the cylinder was warm? Idk.
Yeah, my first temperature measurement was two minutes after pouring the water. And my partner said the same about the cylinder being warm too. But it just bothers me.
You people are forgetting a major aspect here. :P Note that any box built reasonably well built will reach thermal equilibrium. At this point temperature loss is nearly irrelevant as it's so low. I've encountered this multiple times but you must account for it as it will make your values higher.

Ooooh okay. So no matter what, my equation should work, right? I mean transferring water from one container to another shouldn't matter right?
User avatar
TheChiScientist
Member
Member
Posts: 732
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2018 11:25 am
Division: Grad
State: IL
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 44 times

Re: Thermodynamics B/C Build

Post by TheChiScientist »

CaTaStRoPhY wrote:
TheChiScientist wrote:
CaTaStRoPhY wrote:
Yeah, my first temperature measurement was two minutes after pouring the water. And my partner said the same about the cylinder being warm too. But it just bothers me.
You people are forgetting a major aspect here. :P Note that any box built reasonably well built will reach thermal equilibrium. At this point temperature loss is nearly irrelevant as it's so low. I've encountered this multiple times but you must account for it as it will make your values higher.

Ooooh okay. So no matter what, my equation should work, right? I mean transferring water from one container to another shouldn't matter right?
Well to a degree. You have heat loss and then that heat loss increases to a point when water is transferred multiple times. So it can depend on the situation.
A Science Olympian from 2015 - 2019 CLCSO Alumni
Medal Count:30
IL PPP/Mission Assistant State Supervisor.
CLC Div. B Tournament Director.
President of The Builder Cult.
"A true Science Olympian embraces a life without Science Olympiad by becoming a part of Science Olympiad itself"- Me
User avatar
CookiePie1
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:05 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 121 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Re: Thermodynamics B/C Build

Post by CookiePie1 »

TheChiScientist wrote:
CaTaStRoPhY wrote:
TheChiScientist wrote: You people are forgetting a major aspect here. :P Note that any box built reasonably well built will reach thermal equilibrium. At this point temperature loss is nearly irrelevant as it's so low. I've encountered this multiple times but you must account for it as it will make your values higher.

Ooooh okay. So no matter what, my equation should work, right? I mean transferring water from one container to another shouldn't matter right?
Well to a degree. You have heat loss and then that heat loss increases to a point when water is transferred multiple times. So it can depend on the situation.
I still don't believe in equations and I say it's better to just go based on trials. It might work, but it probably won't...
South Brunswick High School Captain '22
2020 Events: Protein Modeling, Ping Pong Parachute, Wright Stuff, Sounds of Music
2021 Events: Protein Modeling, Sounds of Music, Ornithology
2022 Events: TBD

Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.
-Albert Einstein
User avatar
CPScienceDude
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 367
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 2:40 pm
Division: C
State: IN
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 143 times
Been thanked: 89 times

Re: Thermodynamics B/C Build

Post by CPScienceDude »

CookiePie1 wrote:
TheChiScientist wrote:
CaTaStRoPhY wrote:

Ooooh okay. So no matter what, my equation should work, right? I mean transferring water from one container to another shouldn't matter right?
Well to a degree. You have heat loss and then that heat loss increases to a point when water is transferred multiple times. So it can depend on the situation.
I still don't believe in equations and I say it's better to just go based on trials. It might work, but it probably won't...
Well my equation is based on the trials and has so far proved to be very reliable.
Captain of CPSO

Assassinator 139 and 147
2022 events: Chem Lab, Ornithology, Gravity Vehicle, Remote Sensing, Trajectory , and Forensics

About Me!
Image

Return to “Thermodynamics B/C”