I've been afraid of this happening with our fan. I don't think we have met a team that comes close to our current blade. However, on the low speed, our blade has a very low acceleration. It pays off when the blade gets up to speed, but it's possible that the fan won't be powerful enough to move the blade.Skink wrote:Riddle me this: a competitive team had a curious experience with this event recently. Their rotor caught no wind at our fan's low speed but recorded extremely high values (we're talking an order of magnitude higher mV than nearly everyone else) at our high speed. Clearly, their practice fan is more powerful than ours, but what I want to know is what the effectiveness of their design is, then. Is this something I want my teams to attempt to emulate? Anyway, if anyone was curious, they did not recover from losing so many points.
So here's my analysis. Our pitch is very low. If we raise the pitch, we can ensure that the blade will move on low speed. However, this will sacrifice our high top speed. I think this is the problem for the team you're speaking of. This blade can be very effective, but your decision will rely on your own philosophy of risk vs reward.
As for emulating the design, I recommend at least trying. Although, a design can only go so far. At the top level, success often comes from the intricate hidden choices made in the build. Anyone who's emulated a successful tower can attest to this.