Scioly.org

well i needed a quick clue and i meant to give you another hint but didnt get a chance
sorry but the kill stands

Assassinator wrote:well i needed a quick clue and i meant to give you another hint but didnt get a chance
sorry but the kill stands

Another? You never gave us one in the first place.
You just that there was another notable which john nash which we already knew there were multiple. and that we should think different which is no help at all because you don't even know how we were thinking in the first place.

i gave two hints
if you didnt understand them its not my fault

Even then, how the heck were we supposed to get physics out of Johnny Nash? I can see clearly = clairvoyance? I don't think so. As has been said, clairvoyance =/= physics. This barely points to forever, and there was no way we were going to get it. This sassy is NOT going to be popular.

is there a new clue?

i feel bad
i meant to steer you toward this solution more but focused to much effort on getting you to johnny nash
i will give littleboy an extra free accusation (if its wrong, it doesnt matter) to compensate

Assassinator wrote:Wie süß mein Sieg ist.
Ich habe nicht erwartet so eine einfache Oberst töten, was mehr mit einer solchen einfachen Hinweis.
Dennoch war foreverphysics Bunker links unbewacht. Sie hatte ihren Befestigungen an anderer Stelle platziert. Sie starrte in den Himmel, als die Bomben regneten.

Solution (Click to Show Hidden Text)

This was a reference to Johnny Nash. He is the only John Nash who didn't go by John. His most famous single was "I can see clearly now". Clear vision- clairvoyant-psychic-physics.

No, that is not a solution. Try again.

I think that we could have gotten from clairvoyant to foreverphysics. But one of many people to a song they wrote called I can see clearly now to clairvoyant is ridiculis.

Assassinator wrote:i feel bad
i meant to steer you toward this solution more but focused to much effort on getting you to johnny nash
i will give littleboy an extra free accusation (if its wrong, it doesnt matter) to compensate

sassy I have been thinking about this and I just can't seem to figure out how by giving out one free accusation compensates for losing forevers 3 and protection per clue on possibly the worst clue ever?

fine
you win
foreverphysics is back