Gravity Vehicle C

User avatar
Frogger4907
Member
Member
Posts: 458
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:16 am
Division: Grad
State: KS
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: vehicle question

Post by Frogger4907 »

sonac36 wrote:I was wondering if a 2 wheeled vehicle would be permissible under the rules. I haven't built anything yet but I was considering something with 2 wheels.
I'm fairly sure it is permissible.
But how do you plan on having a 2 wheeled car that weights so much (or even if its really light) roll down a ramp without falling on it's side?
Ornithology State Champion
Gravity Vehicle State Champion
Thermodynamics State Champion
Remote Sensing State Champion
>20 Div C State Medals
Balsa Man
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1318
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:01 am
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by Balsa Man »

...or go (consistently) straight?
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
chalker7
Member
Member
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:31 pm
Division: Grad
State: HI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by chalker7 »

Balsa Man wrote:...or go (consistently) straight?
Very wide and flat wheels would keep the vehicle moving straight
National event supervisor - Wright Stuff, Helicopters
Hawaii State Director
User avatar
Frogger4907
Member
Member
Posts: 458
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:16 am
Division: Grad
State: KS
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by Frogger4907 »

chalker7 wrote:
Balsa Man wrote:...or go (consistently) straight?
Very wide and flat wheels would keep the vehicle moving straight
But with all the weight and motion they would have to be like really thick to stay balanced Edit: which would add a lot of friction with an axle.
Ornithology State Champion
Gravity Vehicle State Champion
Thermodynamics State Champion
Remote Sensing State Champion
>20 Div C State Medals
Balsa Man
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1318
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:01 am
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by Balsa Man »

Frogger4907 wrote:
chalker7 wrote:
Balsa Man wrote:...or go (consistently) straight?
Very wide and flat wheels would keep the vehicle moving straight
But with all the weight and motion they would have to be like really thick to stay balanced Edit: which would add a lot of friction with an axle.
Good bearings will minimize axle friction energy loss; wider wheels would mean more rolling friction enregy loss, though.
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
User avatar
bearasauras
Member
Member
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2003 8:33 pm
State: CA
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: vehicle question

Post by bearasauras »

sonac36 wrote:I was wondering if a 2 wheeled vehicle would be permissible under the rules. I haven't built anything yet but I was considering something with 2 wheels.
There's nothing that prevents you from using only 2 wheels, but remember that only the wheels of the vehicle and the ramp are allowed to contact the floor.

*Standard disclaimer about this is not an official clarification, etc. If you want 'official' statements on this issue please submit a question to the soinc.org clarifications page.
User avatar
Littleboy
Member
Member
Posts: 373
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:53 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by Littleboy »

He could be thinking along the lines of a segway
User avatar
bearasauras
Member
Member
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2003 8:33 pm
State: CA
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by bearasauras »

Right, I'm not saying it's impossible. I just wanted them to make sure their device will comply with all parts of the rules. I would be really impressed by a two wheel device that can balance well.
sonac36
Member
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 3:03 pm
Division: C
State: CT
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by sonac36 »

Hey guys. Thanks for all the quick responses! When I mentioned the 2 wheeled vehicle I thought of having some sort of frame with a wingnut braking system that would attach to the axles and hold some sort of weight on it. The reason for the 2 wheel idea was that I was thinking about ways to keep the center of gravity of the vehicle as high as possible. One thing in the rules that I am concerned about, however, is rule 3f: "The vehicle must have... a Measurement point on either side of the vehicle between the front and rear axles." Although the rules never say you have to have a front and rear axle specifically, it is implied that every vehicle will have a front and rear axle in 3f. Any ideas? Thanks again so much.
chalker
Member
Member
Posts: 2107
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:30 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by chalker »

sonac36 wrote:Hey guys. Thanks for all the quick responses! When I mentioned the 2 wheeled vehicle I thought of having some sort of frame with a wingnut braking system that would attach to the axles and hold some sort of weight on it. The reason for the 2 wheel idea was that I was thinking about ways to keep the center of gravity of the vehicle as high as possible. One thing in the rules that I am concerned about, however, is rule 3f: "The vehicle must have... a Measurement point on either side of the vehicle between the front and rear axles." Although the rules never say you have to have a front and rear axle specifically, it is implied that every vehicle will have a front and rear axle in 3f. Any ideas? Thanks again so much.

That's a really good observation. As usual, this isn't the place for official clarifications, but I think the wording does require 2 axles. Of course you could potentially make the device 2 wheeled like a bicycle (as opposed to a segway)

Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair

Return to “2012 Build Events”