Scioly.org

duckiegirl2 wrote:Oh? And who's team might you be on?

im on my school's team. if u want to know more, u can take a guess. and thanks for the support robodude.

cypressfalls_Robert wrote:Cypressfalls hs -->1

I'm going to agree with you on that since LASA's not coming

robotman09 wrote:

srsvball95 wrote:Hutto predictions, anyone?

1.Beckendorff A
2.Beckendorff B
3.Kealing or Kelly Lane

Riverwood isnt going to be at Hutto so it will be hard for us to place

Well I'm actually not sure about that, Robotman. I don't know if we can do that again.... It would be nice, but I don't know.... I guess we'll just have to wait and see on Saturday. It's going to be interesting to see what Kelly Lane and Kealing bring this time although Kelly Lane is only bringing one team....

Juce7 wrote:

duckiegirl2 wrote:Oh? And who's team might you be on?

im on my school's team. if u want to know more, u can take a guess. and thanks for the support robodude.

Juce goes to my school

robodude wrote:WCJH ftw
Beckendorff A 2nd
Beckendorff B 3rd

The only thing standing between us(wcjh) and Nationals is Beckendorff, and this is the tournament where we show that we're a team they need to watch out for!

Nice confidence robodude. But I'm going to have to agree with srsvball when I say that Hutto is going to be a bit more challenging than Greenhill. We're really going to miss Riverwood there but at the same time our team can't wait to compete against Kelly Lane and Kealing again. Let's just wait and see......

duckiegirl2 wrote:Oh? And who's team might you be on?

woah, calm down... ur kind of ruining all of the fun girly...

1. Kealing
2. Beckendorff A
3. Kelly Lane
4. Beckendorff B

honestly, we are not prepared. (wcjh)

It is more difficult to make predictions without knowing who all will be there. But I don't see anyone beating Cyfalls, especially since Clements seems to bring their freshman team to invitationals instead of their final team. I don't really know who else will show up, but I'll go out on a limb and say:

1. Cyfalls
2. Cywoods
3. Kingwood

For B division, I'm going to say:
1. Beckendorff
2. Kelly Lane
3. Kealing

2win wrote:

duckiegirl2 wrote:Oh? And who's team might you be on?

woah, calm down... ur kind of ruining all of the fun girly...

1. Kealing
2. Beckendorff A
3. Kelly Lane
4. Beckendorff B

honestly, we are not prepared. (wcjh)

... Must you be so pestimistic, 2win?

Even if we don't get first, I'm sure we'll place. Remember that we got 4th at CyFalls, and we have gotten better since then.

Its a bumer that they're cutting out so many events... about half of them didn't get coaches, and no coaches means no event.

robodude wrote:

2win wrote:

duckiegirl2 wrote:Oh? And who's team might you be on?

woah, calm down... ur kind of ruining all of the fun girly...

1. Kealing
2. Beckendorff A
3. Kelly Lane
4. Beckendorff B

honestly, we are not prepared. (wcjh)

... Must you be so pestimistic, 2win?

Even if we don't get first, I'm sure we'll place. Remember that we got 4th at CyFalls, and we have gotten better since then.

Its a bumer that they're cutting out so many events... about half of them didn't get coaches, and no coaches means no event.

Ja. And 2, you're the oe who's always saying we're going to lose, then you do. But speak for yourself. I got medals in all my events.

Juce7 wrote:Not to be mean or anything, but u have Kelly lane, kealing, and riverwood in the way.

Maybe we don't feel that they're a threat.

kay, fine. watch me not medal in my events. the rest of my team is doing real well. there, happy?

good luck to Hutto, Harmony, Kealing, Kelly Lane and Beckendorff.

I didn't say I wanted you to like get all depressed, I just don't want you to rag on your own team.

u dont think kealing, kelly lane, and riverwood are a threat? wow. their still awesome teams and u cant diregard them. u guys have done well in the past and are a pretty decent team, but no team in the state of texas is good enough to just disregard kelly lane and kealing and just walk in and hope to get first.