Scioly.org

schist99centz wrote:

I'm assuming raw scores for builds will not be released?

If you are referring to C states, the top 6 robot scores are posted on the Robot Arm forums and I also know the top 2 tower scores

MattH2018 wrote:

schist99centz wrote:

I'm assuming raw scores for builds will not be released?

If you are referring to C states, the top 6 robot scores are posted on the Robot Arm forums and I also know the top 2 tower scores

Towers 3rd was 1750.

Bazinga+ wrote:

MattH2018 wrote:

schist99centz wrote:

I'm assuming raw scores for builds will not be released?

If you are referring to C states, the top 6 robot scores are posted on the Robot Arm forums and I also know the top 2 tower scores

Towers 3rd was 1750.

And top 2 were 2959 and 2550

Any predictions on trials next year? (topic or specific event)

Dear Bay Academy School,

I deeply apologize for my actions.  I understand the impact it has caused. I never stopped to think how my words would be so hurtful. I should not have written such an untrue statement. In person I would never had done such a thing. But when behind screens, it was so easy for me to not stop and think, thinking of nothing but "anonymity." I've learned a difficult lesson the hard way. Please take this apology from one that never aimed to demoralize anyone. I wish the best of luck to your teams and hope that your members will accept this sincere apology. 

Sincerely,

BT

GneissGuy17 wrote:Congrats to FM and Columbia! Wow, HHHE didn't perform as well as I had expected. But props to Spack for getting 5th. How'd that happen? Great job to everyone though.

I can say that HHHE had a bad year, our kids just didn't work as hard as they should have. I think they got a bit cocky after a 2nd place finish at regionals (though the gap between us and Ward Melville was substantial) and they felt like they could do everything last minute. We also only had 2 seniors on the team, which hurt. The other coaches and I have already been talking about what we can do for next year to improve organization and get people coming to meetings more. Attendance was a big issue, and even when people did come to meetings, they weren't very productive. We had a great group of kids but the effort just wasn't there. Hopefully next year we come back in full force.

Congratulations to FM and Columbia for a fantastic showing, and props to WM for 3rd!

MattH2018 wrote:

Bazinga+ wrote: Towers 3rd was 1750.

And top 2 were 2959 and 2550

I believe that there was only one negative score for EV and I had a score of around 5 for my EV and placed 4th so i guess that puts the rest of the scores into perspective

colaboy82 wrote:

MattH2018 wrote:

Bazinga+ wrote: Towers 3rd was 1750.

And top 2 were 2959 and 2550

I believe that there was only one negative score for EV and I had a score of around 5 for my EV and placed 4th so i guess that puts the rest of the scores into perspective

Seriously? Only one negative score? I expected many more considering that we were able to get double digit negative scores rather consistently.

Bazinga+ wrote:

colaboy82 wrote:

MattH2018 wrote: And top 2 were 2959 and 2550

I believe that there was only one negative score for EV and I had a score of around 5 for my EV and placed 4th so i guess that puts the rest of the scores into perspective

Seriously? Only one negative score? I expected many more considering that we were able to get double digit negative scores rather consistently.

Yeah, it shocked me too when I heard because I was able to get negative scores pretty consistently also. Maybe the competition nerves got to everyone ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. I am pretty sure there was only one negative score but I would not be surprised if I am wrong because that would also mean second and third place had to be from 0 - 4 points and that seems like a very small variation.

colaboy82 wrote:

Bazinga+ wrote:

colaboy82 wrote:
I believe that there was only one negative score for EV and I had a score of around 5 for my EV and placed 4th so i guess that puts the rest of the scores into perspective

Seriously? Only one negative score? I expected many more considering that we were able to get double digit negative scores rather consistently.

Yeah, it shocked me too when I heard because I was able to get negative scores pretty consistently also. Maybe the competition nerves got to everyone ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. I am pretty sure there was only one negative score but I would not be surprised if I am wrong because that would also mean second and third place had to be from 0 - 4 points and that seems like a very small variation.

Iirc 3rd was around 1