Helicopters C

Bluejet1179
Member
Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 3:56 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Helicopters C

Post by Bluejet1179 »

_deltaV wrote:Just to give some perspective, teams were breaking 2:30 at Cornell. At MIT, one team in the time block before me broke something like 2:30 and another team seemed really excited about that. My time of :58 didn't break the top 30 and 1:17 from our B team didn't break the top 20. I think at Nationals this year we're going to see at least one or two teams breaking 3:45. IMHO, at this point 2:00 is the minimum time needed to stay competitive when teams are breaking 2:30 this early in the season
Did you have logs at MIT? I competed at MIT and got 8th with a time of 1:05 and completed logs. Is there really a 20 place gap for 7 seconds?
User avatar
Bazinga+
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 383
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 7:10 am
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Helicopters C

Post by Bazinga+ »

Bluejet1179 wrote:
_deltaV wrote:Just to give some perspective, teams were breaking 2:30 at Cornell. At MIT, one team in the time block before me broke something like 2:30 and another team seemed really excited about that. My time of :58 didn't break the top 30 and 1:17 from our B team didn't break the top 20. I think at Nationals this year we're going to see at least one or two teams breaking 3:45. IMHO, at this point 2:00 is the minimum time needed to stay competitive when teams are breaking 2:30 this early in the season
Did you have logs at MIT? I competed at MIT and got 8th with a time of 1:05 and completed logs. Is there really a 20 place gap for 7 seconds?
Weird, we got 9th with around 1:35 with logs no bonus.
Innovation =/= success
RJohnson
Member
Member
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 8:47 am
Division: C
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Helicopters C

Post by RJohnson »

Was at a competition this past weekend. First place was recorded as 230 seconds, second place as 142. Not sure if first was a mistake or an incredible flight. Don't know about bonus on either one.
P2P
Member
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2015 7:43 am
Division: C
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Helicopters C

Post by P2P »

Are you sure it's not 2:30?

3 minutes 50 seconds is a really long time...
dhdarren
Member
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2015 2:34 pm
Division: C
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Helicopters C

Post by dhdarren »

RJohnson wrote:Was at a competition this past weekend. First place was recorded as 230 seconds, second place as 142. Not sure if first was a mistake or an incredible flight. Don't know about bonus on either one.
Could I ask which competition this was? And I agree with P2P, 2:30 seems much more likely than 230 seconds.
2015:
R | S
Bridge: 1 | 8
AirTraj: 5 | 26
WS: 12 | 9
Scrambler: 6 | 17
DP: 7 | X

2016:
Bridge: 2 | 15
AirTraj: 2 | 6
WS: 3 | 11
DP: 4 | 15
GeoMap: 4 | 25

2017:
Heli: 1 | 1
Hover: 1 | 4
Towers: 2 | 15
DP: 1 | 6
Wind: 2 | 8
2018:
R | S
Heli:
Hover:
Towers:
DP:
Eco:
MV:[/b]
User avatar
daydreamer0023
Member
Member
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 5:44 pm
Division: Grad
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Helicopters C

Post by daydreamer0023 »

Bazinga+ wrote:
Bluejet1179 wrote:
_deltaV wrote:Just to give some perspective, teams were breaking 2:30 at Cornell. At MIT, one team in the time block before me broke something like 2:30 and another team seemed really excited about that. My time of :58 didn't break the top 30 and 1:17 from our B team didn't break the top 20. I think at Nationals this year we're going to see at least one or two teams breaking 3:45. IMHO, at this point 2:00 is the minimum time needed to stay competitive when teams are breaking 2:30 this early in the season
Did you have logs at MIT? I competed at MIT and got 8th with a time of 1:05 and completed logs. Is there really a 20 place gap for 7 seconds?
Weird, we got 9th with around 1:35 with logs no bonus.
What models were used by the winning teams at MIT and Cornell? Freedom Flight without modification? Modified FFM? Or the conventional X rotor design? Just curious.
"I am among those who think that science has great beauty. A scientist in his laboratory is not only a technician: he is also a child placed before natural phenomena which impress him like a fairy tale." - Marie Curie

Enloe '19 || UNC Chapel Hill '23

See resources I helped create here!
AznPr0d1gy
Member
Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 1:02 pm
Division: C
State: TX
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Helicopters C

Post by AznPr0d1gy »

If there is a time of 230, theres gotta be some dude breaking the bank to hire a team of engineers. And even then, I'm not sure they can achieve that due to limitations of the rubber itself.
BuildingFriend
Member
Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 9:24 pm
State: DC
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Helicopters C

Post by BuildingFriend »

Cornell isn't a good metric for winning times now- we achieved fourth place with a 4 am build session off a partial kit using wooden rotors. Most teams are using a modified FFM kit or traditional FFM kit. I believe 2:30 is a reasonable time- if anything some teams are shooting for 2:45 (after bonus calculation). However I think that is impossible and 2:30-2:35 will be a national winning/placing time. I only know of one team not using FFM kit and achieving sub 2 minute times.
Fermilicious
User avatar
Bazinga+
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 383
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 7:10 am
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Helicopters C

Post by Bazinga+ »

AznPr0d1gy wrote:If there is a time of 230, theres gotta be some dude breaking the bank to hire a team of engineers. And even then, I'm not sure they can achieve that due to limitations of the rubber itself.
I have achieved sub-2:30 times, and think we can still do better. I will try to post a video as soon as I get another chance to test on a high ceiling. I honestly think nationals times could surpass 3 minutes.
Innovation =/= success
AznPr0d1gy
Member
Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 1:02 pm
Division: C
State: TX
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Helicopters C

Post by AznPr0d1gy »

I was the one that won Berkeley with a 2 min 28s time. The ceiling was around 5 meters tall. I can definitely see myself breaking 3 minutes once I get things up and running.

Return to “Helicopters C”